Manufacturing Solutions Center Is Helping Start-Ups Find Footing, Soar

The center’s Incubator Program is seeking entrepreneurs looking to realize their dreams.

TW Special Report

Tucked in the foothills of North Carolina across from the railroad tracks in the quaint Catawba County town of Conover with a population of just 8,421, the Manufacturing Solutions Center (MSC) is something of a hidden gem.

But several entrepreneurs with big dreams and little idea how to start a business were lucky enough to find this resource facility — and success has followed. For some entrepreneurs, growth has been exponential. And all of these industrialists credit the MSC for enabling them to find solid footing and not only survive, but thrive.

Nufabrx, InnovaKnits, Yu Apparel Corp. and Evolved by Nature — are four companies that currently are part of the MSC’s Incubator Program. More than a decade old, the program allows new companies to set up pilot manufacturing facilities in the center to make product onsite as well as gives them access to the MSC’s equipment, resources and services.
As the launching pad for these businesses, the MSC, part of Catawba Valley Community College (CVCC), brings its mission — to help U.S. manufacturers increase sales, improve quality and improve efficiency to create or retain jobs —to life. All in America.

Operating inside the MSC, these featured incubator companies all expanded to a point that the facility has been bursting at the seams in recent years. But fortunately for the center and its tenants, a new 75,000-square-foot facility was recently constructed adjacent to the current space. The Manufacturing Solutions Center II (MSC II) is a joint partnership between the City of Conover, the Manufacturing Solutions Center, Catawba Valley Community College and private investment firm Whiskbroom.

The newly inaugurated building was made possible by $9 million in federal COVID-19 funding appropriated by the state as part of the PPE Initiative, which allowed the MSC to purchase hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of equipment that can be used to test personal protective equipment as well as numerous other products.

The new Manufacturing Solutions Center II brings 75,000-square-feet of space to the center’s entrepreneurial Incubator Program.

Incubator Program Supports Start-Ups

Since 1990, the MSC has offered innumerable services to manufacturing clients, so initiating an incubator program was a logical next step, according to Tony Whitener, Special Projects director at the center. Testing, prototyping, product development, engineering, training, marketing, production sourcing, and cut and sew are just a few of the services offered.

“If you’re in manufacturing, it’s not just the equipment you have to have to make your product,” Whitener said. “It’s all the support items such as air compressors, boilers, steam tables, washers, dryers, dye equipment and printers. And then other things we take for granted like meeting spaces, breakrooms and a receptionist. All of that is overhead for companies, so working in this space greatly reduces capital expenses. Plus, we have testing, product development and engineering services available. Within this ecosystem, just think how valuable that is for as startup to have these services in-house.”

Each of the incubators also operates in the textile and apparel space, to varying degrees, which allows them to collaborate on specific issues and needs, as well as provide each other counsel, advice and referrals.

Representatives of the four incubator companies all credit much of their success to the MSC. The benefits of locating inside the center have brought cost-effective resources and solutions that could not have been possible as standalone entities, they report.

Nufabrx founder Jordan Schindler and Brad Seese, vice president of manufacturing and process innovation, with some of Nufabrx’s products.

Nufabrx

While in college in Seattle, Jordan Schindler suffered from bad skin, and he learned from his dermatologist that pillowcases are one of the leading causes of acne. That led him to explore the possibility of creating a product to address the issue. After developing a prototype pillowcase embedded with lavender, he solicited the help of MIT scientists, gathered a few angel investors and spent seven years developing proprietary technology to embed active ingredients into yarn itself to make medicinal application easier and more efficient.

After launching the company in 2011, he needed a place to produce in the United States at scale and one of his investors recommended the MSC. So, he flew cross country to meet now-retired MSC Director Dan St. Louis and Whitener, and, “Within 10 minutes of meeting with these guys, I knew that this was the place that we had to be,” Schindler said. “It’s the only facility of its kind in the country that’s designed to promote and grow the domestic textile industry. So we moved the business here.”

With very little knowledge of textiles, he quickly learned that the center is a hub of expertise in the discipline, and Catawba County is situated in the heart of the U.S. textile industry.

“Textiles is way more complex than many people think, so having these resources all under roof was going to be incredibly valuable in the success of our business,” Schindler said. “I learned that textiles is a ‘who do you know’ type of industry, and people won’t just pick up the phone if they don’t know you. But when someone from the MSC makes an introduction, the people who you need to reach respond right away. It really is this network of interconnectivity, which is so important for next generation of innovation.”

And “innovation” is the lifeblood of a company such as Nufabrx, he added. Creating a new category it calls “HealthWear™,” the company’s first commercial products available in market were capsaicin-infused sleeves designed to deliver pain relief directly to areas of the body. During COVID-19, the company developed antimicrobial, shea-butter infused face masks that were such a hit that the Federal Government sent three Black-hawk helicopters to Schindler’s facility to pick up 250,000 masks. The company also has launched maternity garments infused with shea butter and shapewear that will combat certain cellulite conditions, while continuing to test many other products.

“We sit at the intersection of pharmaceuticals and drug delivery and textiles and apparel,” Schindler said. “So, you think about lots of apparel companies looking for points of differentiation, and they would love to sell in a pharmacy, right? Or vice versa, where a pharmaceutical company would love to sell in sports and apparel. And there is a billion-dollar marketplace where Nufabrx technology sits at the intersection of both of those things.”

One of the biggest challenges in modern medicine is patient compliance, he noted. “Consumers don’t often remember to take pills or creams as directed, but fortunately we all get dressed every single morning and clothing contacts our skin all day every day,” he said. “So, this is the perfect platform for simplifying health and wellness outcomes.”
When Schindler moved to Conover, he employed only a scientist and a couple of contractors, so he was wearing a number of hats. But with the MSC’s resources at the ready, Nufabrx was able to speed up development tenfold, he recalled.

“There are so many things for a start-up to focus on to get a company off the ground, and the more things that you can remove from that equation, the better off the company’s chances of success are,” Schindler noted. “A company does not need to be worried about paying the electricity bill or water or how they’re going to get a compressed air line. The MSC has done an incredible job of taking all those things off the table. There are all these things in this environment that allows companies to focus on their core innovations of bringing a product to market, which is hard enough without having to worry about all these ancillary things. And so being in that environment allows us to focus on creativity and innovation.”

He added: “The ability to do R&D on one side of the building, walk it down a hallway, get it tested for stretch, abrasion, or moisture wicking, for example, then walk it down another hallway and do microscopy analysis and antimicrobial testing is incredible. There are all these things under one roof that you can’t find anywhere else. We would’ve had to send out these products for testing and wait a couple weeks for them to come back versus literally a 24-hour response time, which has enabled us to bring products to market so much faster.”

Another advantage of being housed at the MSC is its textile and apparel training sessions, added Brad Seese, vice president of manufacturing and process innovation, Nufabrx.
“Our marketing folks and account managers are able to take classes here to learn about knit construction and different types of machines and processes,” Seese said. “That way, they can understand the technology and terminology, denier and filament count and the different types of synthetics.”

Today, Nufabrx products are avail-able at several major retailers such as Walmart and Target and pharmacy chains such as CVS and Walgreens. Walmart added Nufabrx products to its shelves in March 2020 at the start of the pandemic, and along with its move into personal protective equipment (PPE), that precipitated the need to quickly expand.
Nufabrx opened an Innovation Center inside the facility of its manufacturing partner, Bossong Hosiery in Asheboro, N.C., and grew its employee base from a handful to now nearly 45. Its space has grown from about 2,800 square feet to about 20,000 square feet at MSC II.

Last year, Nufabrx ranked number 8 on the Deloitte Technology Fast 500™, a ranking of the 500 fastest-growing technology, media, telecommunications, life sciences, fintech and energy tech companies in North America.

“Being located here is one of the main reasons that our company has been successful,” Schindler said. “It’s because of this ecosystem that still exists here in North Carolina. It’s the reason we were able to make facemasks so quickly and bring that product to market. It’s the reason we’re able to scale. While a lot of other companies are worried about supply chain issues, we’re not sitting at a port waiting on a product to arrive. We’re able to drive down the road, get all of our raw materials, and then bring it to market. Having a domestic supply chain is the right thing to do for the country, and also the right thing to do for our business in terms of our ability to and execute and grow.”

InnovaKnits Managing Partners Jason Wilkins (left) and Neil Tagner

InnovaKnits

After earning undergraduate and graduate degrees in business at Florida State, Jason Wilkins accidentally backed into the textile and apparel industry. But as co-owner of InnovaKnits, one of the first companies to join MSC’s Incubator Program in 2015, he’s all in these days.

He and his business partner Neil Tagner have built a successful, state-of-the-art textile manufacturing company specializing in flat knit consulting/development and domestic production of flat knit textiles, all produced at the MSC.

Wilkins and Tagner found their way from St. Petersburg, Fla., to Conover after having worked together at a medical device manufacturer that produced lower limb prostheses requiring a skin-friendly fabric liner. And that was the extent of their work with textiles. With the desire to vertically integrate and control the various characteristics of fabric, the company brought fabric production in house. Needing expertise, Wilkins hired Tagner, who had spent his career in textile mills, as a textile consultant. As the company expanded into ancillary apparel products, it invested in more than 30 flatbed or circular knitting machines, and Tagner was hired full time.

After having basically built a textile production mill inside an injection molding company, Wilkins and Tagner began to wonder: Could they strike out on their own and replicate that success as a knitting company?

Having already spent time at the MSC taking Hosiery 101 and 102 classes, the center already was on their radar. So, the pair reached out to Whitener and St. Louis with “tons of questions,” Wilkins said. Armed with the proper intel and ambition, and with the MSC beginning to get its incubator program off the ground, they decided to pull up stakes and head to North Carolina.

As flatbed knitting “experts” by this point, they began to look across all product categories and customers to understand the market and how their fabric formation discipline could meet those needs, Wilkins said. Looking at the entire picture, they ended up as a custom contract manufacturer.

“Niche contract manufacturing is really where we are,” Wilkins said. “We are flatbed centric. We’re very well versed in a particular machine type and a particular technology, and we are focused on products that can be, should be and need to be made with that technology.”
With two machines to start, they began to do a lot of design and development work, working with the MSC testing labs to conceive specialty products for a handful of customers. As business grew, they added two more knitting machines, then another, and slowly grew to 20 STOLL by KARL MAYER machines, 10 employees and many more customers today, Wilkins said.

InnovaKnits’ markets include performance athletic shoe uppers and compression dance socks/braces; medical items including prosthetic socks, shrinkers and masks; automotive interior fabric; aerospace fabrics; and apparel scarves.

Among the many benefits of being located at the MSC is the many visitors who tour the facility and see InnovaKnits’ machines in action, which has led to many conversations and some business, Wilkins said. Major brands and retailers have stopped by to ask questions and have come away impressed with its setup inside the center, he added. “There’s definitely a business legitimization component to this,” he said. “We have access to shared resources that we could not afford when we first started,” Wilkins said. “Things like a boiler, plumbing and forklift. And then not to mention the assistance we get from the MSC personnel, who are experts and who know a lot of people in the industry. Plus, having a test lab onsite is a big deal for us and for a lot of our customers. There is a tremendous cost savings because of those shared resources.”

Moving into the MSC II building has provided InnovaKnits with about four times the space it previously had, allowing it to add about 25 percent more machines, hire operators and expand production, he pointed out.

“It’s a no-brainer to be located at the MSC because there is no other entity like this in the country that has these resources, is connected to the industry and has your best interests in mind,” Wilkins said. “There are hundreds of years of experience in this facility. Having this ecosystem here, in a place where people have a vested interest in your success, is much better than operating a block away and having little resources and nobody to support you.”

Yu Apparel’s Tammy Bowman and Mark Bess, director of manufacturing

Yu Apparel Corp.

For years, Dr. Chao Yu, a vascular surgeon and phlebologist in Edmon-ton, Alberta, bought compression socks in big volumes from Asian producers. But he wasn’t always pleased with the quality, or the “one-size-fits-all” aspects of bulk ordering. He realized there was a growing need for high-quality, true graduated compression apparel at an affordable price. He and his wife Tanya discovered the MSC and visited Conover to learn more about compression socks through hosiery courses taking place at the center. Through conversations with MSC leaders, Dr. Yu decided to have the center run samples before moving forward with the desire to start his own sock production company as an incubator at the MSC.

Knowing an expert would be needed to manage the operation, Whitener reached out to hosiery veteran Mark Bess about the potential of joining the startup. After weeks of conversations with the Dr. Yu, Bess came aboard, part time at first, in 2016 to get the business off the ground, starting with just one knitting machine.

Once launched, the company started reaching out to other vascular practices about their compression sock needs and learned that about half of the doctors would like their own private label in these products, Bess recalled. That led to the servicing of a market with huge potential.

After receiving samples, those doctors were pleased with the quality of the product, the fact that it is made in the USA with U.S.-produced yarns and that minimum orders were low, according to Bess. So, Yu Apparel began to develop brands for some of these new clients, or worked directly with others’ patients to deliver compression socks that met their needs.

“They want the product to be right and they want quick delivery,” Bess said. “They love our products, which we stand behind 100 percent. And we can do custom orders as needed and expedite it for one-day or two-day turnarounds.”

Early on, the company created its own medical-grade brand, Yu Compression Wear, and later expanded its customer base to include airline personnel, medical personnel, education professionals and others. It also has expanded into other areas of socks.

“We have a company in Florida that does high-end dress socks, and we keep two machines running for them year-round,” Bess said. “They tried sourcing from Asia, but they said that was a nightmare. Now, they want only made-in-America products, and they love our quality and our turnaround.”

During the pandemic, Yu Apparel transitioned some of its production into face masks for medical personnel as well as the general public while also continuing to make socks. All told, the company produced about 20,000 masks that were sent all around the United States and Canada.

Launching the company and finding success would have been difficult if not virtually impossible without joining MSC’s Incubator Program, Bess noted. “We could not have gotten off the ground without the MSC,” he said. “First of all, we didn’t know what machine would be right for us, so they secured a loaner machine for us to test. And we didn’t know what kind of finishing we would need, or what kind of boarding equipment, or where we could do testing. And that’s where the MSC helped us. We didn’t have to spend a lot of money until we knew exactly what we needed.”

Collaboration among the incubators is not only encouraged, but practiced, Bess added.
“All of the companies here get along well and work well together,” he said. “We help each other. If one of us runs out of yarn and they can’t get it quickly, another one will loan them yarn, for example. The goal for each of us is to succeed and make product in America.”
Since moving into the MSC II, Yu Apparel has expanded from three Lonati knitting machines to 25 and is hiring more operators, which will greatly enhance its ability to grow.

Josh Davis (left), associate lab manager, and Enrico Mortarino, vice president, Textile Innovation, Evolved by Nature.

Evolved By Nature

Drs. Gregory Altman and Rebecca “Beck” Lacourture — Ph.D.s in biotechnology engineering and biomedical engineering, respectively — have been partners in silk chemistry since their days as students. And when Beck was diagnosed with ovarian cancer in her 20s, the duo realized reinventing silk in liquid form could replace harmful ingredients in skincare products and create a platform for entirely unique and biocompatible benefits across nearly any industry.

They launched a startup company producing orthopedic products with silk proteins, which became a success venture that was eventually sold to a large company. Enrico Mortarino, a textile specialist, had joined that company in 2003 and would join Evolved by Nature™ (formerly Silk Inc.) after its founding in Boston, Mass., in 2013.

Mortarino, who had done some testing at the MSC when he was with a previous company, informed Alt-man and Lacourture about the center and soon, the cofounders would open the company’s innovation cen-ter in the incubator at the MSC. Mortarino would lead the venture as vice president of Textile Innovation.

Evolved by Nature, which produces sustainable alternatives to the petrochemical coatings used by the leather and textile industries, also operates a full-scale, state-of-the-art manufacturing facility in Med-ford, Mass. The company has created a proprietary technology platform of Activated Silk™ molecules from natural silk protein, which will move global markets away from dependence on synthetics and fossil fuel derivatives and expand the boundaries of regenerative medicine. Evolved by Nature’s biodegradable, high-performance finishes have been adopted by fashion brands including Anya Hind-march, nylon mills including Alpine Creations and Apex Holdings, and leather tanneries including Richard Hoffmans GmbH & Co. KG, Cyclica S.r.l. and Curtidos Bengala.

“The issue with a synthesized fiber is no one has really ever figured out how to make the self-assembly part happen,” said Chris Valencius, the company’s senior vice president, Strategic and Translational Marketing, explaining the technology. “And silk fiber is a miraculous material that has been developed and perfected by nature over millions of years. So instead of having one gigantic reactor, we look at silkworms as our reactor. Every silkworm has a little reactor in it already. And it uses sun-light and mulberry leaves as the inputs. And the little gland in there is our little reactor, and it that produces all these silk peptides.”

He added: “It’s already a very sustainable process that works incredibly well. We don’t have to replicate it. We just have to figure out a way to actually unlock the things inside the silk protein. That’s really what Greg and Beck are focused on. There is a whole universe of molecules within silk protein. You can go in and grab a couple, and that becomes the base of your textile finishing chemical.”

Utilizing 100-percent biobased products that are biodegradable and offering an alternative to petrochemicals offers a tremendously sustain-able, safer solution, Valencius added. “Chemicals are the great invisible problem,” he said. “If you don’t solve the toxin and chemical problem, you’re not going to be able to achieve or advance sustainability or achieve circularity. As regulations tighten up in the textile and apparel industry, having an inordinate amount of problematic chemistry is going to become a real knot to untangle for the entire supply chain.”

Last year, the company closed $120 million in Series C financing, which will ramp up production volumes to 900 metric tons of Activated Silk per year.

As part of the MSC ecosystem, Evolved By Nature’s innovation arm is reaping the benefits of shared space and resources, Mortarino said. “For instance, we share costs for utilities, which offers a tremendous savings,” he said. “And we have access to a wet lab and all of the equipment here at the center. For a startup, this is an incredibly sweet deal because it allows you to concentrate fully on your projects without having to worry about all of the other things that sometimes crush businesses.”

And utilizing those testing labs for a company performing research and development work is a giant plus, Mortarino added. “We are able to do testing on top of testing through the MSC’s resources, and we can troubleshoot much easier. These labs also can do third-part validation for brands that require that.”

Evolved by Nature’s three-employee Innovation Center expanded its space from 1,800 square feet to more than 11,000 square feet upon moving into the MSC II building, he said. “We’re planning to grow quite a bit as the center adds more processing and laboratory equipment.”


Editor’s Note: The MSC is seeking conversations with other entrepreneurs exploring launching a start-up. E-mail twhitener@manufacturingsolutions center.org and visit manufacturing solutionscenter.org to learn more.


March/April 2023

ITMA 2023 Exhibitor Preview: Knitting Machinery Innovator Pailung

TW Special Report

In June 2023, Pailung will exhibit AlterKnit at ITMA in Milan, alongside its portfolio of advanced, circular knitting machines, fabric technologies, and system innovations, including the MES and fabric defect detection systems.

AlterKnit™ Stretchable Patterned Fabrics: Versatile, Comfortable and Sustainable

Ideal for fashion and apparel, Pailung’s latest fabric technology, AlterKnit, enables textile designers and manufacturers to produce luxurious fabrics with intricate patterns, knitted into their structure, negating any need for post-production printing or dyeing.

AlterKnit is an upgraded version of inverse plating. It works by knitting alternate yarns into the fabric’s structure. The process is performed on circular knitting machines, whereby yarns of different color or composition can be knitted together within the same row.

The technology yields crisp patterns with sharp borders — a noticeable step up from standard inverse plating. Extremely versatile, it provides unlimited pattern possibilities for designers, capable of capturing gradient designs, argyle and denim patterns etc. It can capture the intricate details of a sports team emblem, for example, including text and logos. AlterKnit fabric is also reversible, producing two inverted versions of the same design (with up to four colors) on either side.

In terms of texture, the fabric has a smooth, even surface, making it comfortable to wear, as it fits snugly against the body. In single-knit, the technology produces lightweight fabric that feels like second skin, and is well-suited to sports apparel or athleisure applications. In double-knit, the fabric is sturdier, but it’s still 50-percent lighter than four-color jacquard, making it ideal for contact sports, such as basketball, football, hockey, soccer, and rugby.

When designing for adventure or endurance activities, different types of yarn can be combined to create functional fabrics with enhanced features, such as moisture-wicking, breathability, elasticity etc.

AlterKnit™ Reduces Water Pollution

Printing and dyeing may be the traditional methods for manufacturing patterned textiles, but consumers and governments are becoming increasingly concerned about the environmental impact of dyes, which can leak out of fabric, and printing adhesives that can disintegrate, polluting waterways. There’s growing demand for patterned textiles that both look and feel great, while championing sustainability.

Unlike traditional printing, the designs seen on AlterKnit fabrics are knitted into the fabric’s structure. This prevents the designs, along with any chemicals used during production, from rubbing off or leaking into the surrounding environment.

Through the selection of raw materials, AlterKnit can further prevent chemicals from leaking out. Some methods of manufacturing colorful, patterned fabric involve dyeing completed pieces, however, AlterKnit fabrics use yarn that’s dyed before the knitting process. This not only provides greater control over the color and pattern, but also allows the dye to penetrate deeper into the fibers. It increases color durability, as the dyes are less likely to fade away due to long-term use, or exposure to sunlight and chemicals — like those used in washing machines.

AlterKnit™ Reduces Textile Waste

Overall, the long-lasting nature of AlterKnit increases the lifespan of finished garments, preventing them from being quickly discarded, sent to a landfill or incinerated. Recycled or biodegradable yarns can also be utilized. This can, effectively, help to reduce textile waste and support a closed-loop fashion industry.

The AlterKnit process can also reduce waste during production. In certain techniques, like Intarsia, yarns of different colors are knitted together, causing strands of loose yarn to run along the back of the fabric. These are known as yarn floats. Other methods include splicing or cut-and-sew, which involves cutting pieces of fabric in different colors and stitching them together, creating scraps that would be hard to recycle or repurpose.

In the case of AlterKnit, and the inverse plating technique, both front and back of the fabric will display patterns that mirror each other, which means there are no yarn floats to trim away, resulting in less textile waste. Patterns and colors are directly knitted into the fabric structure, so there’s no need to splice together different colored fabrics. As a result, AlterKnit not only reduces waste, but also the time, energy, and labor associated with trimming yarn floats or cut-and-sew.

Posted: March 29, 2023

Source: Pailung Machinery Mill Co. Ltd.

Rethinking Performance

Textiles have come a long way from their early beginnings to playing a
large role in allowing man to walk on the moon and beyond. By necessity, textile performance also has evolved.
(photo: History in HD)

As time and technologies progress, the definition of a textile’s performance will also continue to evolve.

By Jim Kaufmann, Contributing Editor

In the grand scheme of things, it really wasn’t so long ago that the term “performance,” as specifically related to textiles, consisted of two rather basic questions — does it keep a wearer warm or cool depending on the time of year? And how long will it last until I need to replace it? Not long after, a notable refinement occurred, and the two original questions evolved into a new basic three: Does it work? — a combination of the original two questions; Can I get it?; and lest we forget the all-important question, How much does it cost?

Early beginnings (Photo: Trougnouf/Benoit Brummer)

Inevitably, it was decided that different colors were a good thing and making sure that colors could be produced in a repeatable manner was added to the growing list of performance attributes. As the textile industry continued to advance and became more technically adept using not only cotton and wool but also newly developed man-made fibers, technologies improved and new attributes added further definition to products. Fabric forming technologies became defined as the big three — weaving, knitting and nonwovens. Refinement of characteristics such as construction, pattern design, weight, tensile strength, elongation, and other properties became common place for manufacturers in order to better quantify products, while also helping to improve quality and consistency.

Fast forward again to when engineers realized that textiles could be used in areas other than clothing or linens. As a result, industrial textiles become more clearly defined, though still largely unrecognized to much of the general public. High-performance fibers — including Nomex®, Kevlar® and spandex, among other fibers —were developed, along with a variety of coatings and laminated options.Performance definitions expanded to include flame retardancy, air permeability and water permeability. Not to be outdone, the traditional textile industry became much better at creating or designing for seasons, climate characteristics and comfort levels. New methods of defining textiles using terms such as drapability, washability, colorfastness, and abrasion testing along proper documentation, specifications and certifications became commonplace.

In the present day, the word textile ostensibly continues to be associated with negative historical connotations. The nonwovens segment appears to have distanced itself from textiles altogether and increasingly textile is being supplanted by terms such as performance fabrics, engineered materials and fibrous composites —or it’s just not mentioned at all. The characterization of performance continues as the list of attributes expands becoming increasingly more comprehensive as does our collective knowledge of products and technologies across the board. Several recently coined terms or phrases including sustainability, product transparency, recycled content, circularity and social responsibility have now taken center stage in textiles and other related industries, which represent a whole host of new issues emanating from growing environmental, health and societal concerns.

Traditional Plus “New” Performance Criteria

Sustainability has become a rather complex concept as it relates to the textile industry, yet it is simply defined by the Oxford Dictionary as “the ability to be maintained at a certain rate or level.” However, according to the website youmatter.world in its “Sustainability — What Is It? Definition, Principles and Examples” article, in recent years: “because of the environmental and social problems societies around the world are facing, sustainability has been increasingly used in a specific way. Nowadays, sustainability is usually defined as the processes and actions through which humankind avoids the depletion of natural resources, in order to keep an ecological balance that doesn’t allow the quality of life in modern societies to decrease.”

Product transparency, as the term implies, denotes the open disclosure of detailed information specific to the content and origins of products and any inputs used to create them. The term is becoming more visible and prevalent in many market segments. Social responsibility represents the efforts made to educate and entice businesses, professionals and consumers in taking a more active stance towards ensuring that today’s products purchased, the places where people live and work, or activities we all pursue are not a detriment to our personal health and/or the environment we inhabit.

Collectively, these issues are quickly rising to the forefront of many different textile industry segments. As a result, there has been a complete rethink of how performance is defined because “We’ve now reached a stage where traditional product attributes no longer provide enough information to tell the whole story,” noted Joe Walkuski, president of Boseman, Mon.-based Texbase Inc., during a recent joint workshop presentation with Ben Galphin, founder of Outsider Innovation, Charlotte, N.C.

During their presentation, Galphin and Walkuski pieced together and defended their view of what performance attributes for many textile products either have already expanded to include or likely will expand to include. To the more common or traditional textile performance attributes, Walkuski and Galphin added three equally important new segments — traceability, utility, and the aforementioned sustainability.

Traceability highlights the growing and extended responsibilities being progressively demanded by consumers and increasingly legislated by governments of textile brands and their manufacturers to defend the authenticity of supply chains, the inputs used and resultant products produced. Traceability also encompasses an increased need for verification of environmental and social good. For example, is there verification that the products are being manufactured in a societally ethical and safe environment and the inputs used are validated to be what the specification says they are? Regulation of potentially harmful chemicals, reduction in counterfeiting and possible manufacturer liabilities are also considered within this segment. “We have seen an increase in testing requests from customers who want to verify and confirm that what they received is actually what they intended to purchase,” reports Katrina Penegar, testing lab manager for the Textile Technology Center at Gaston College, Belmont, N.C.

As technical knowledge and capabilities increase, the utility of everyday fabrics in virtually all market sectors are also increased, adding to a performance rethink. Growing technologies contributing to this rethink include antimicrobial and antiviral ingredients or finishes, active insect protection from tick and mosquito-borne dis-eases, drug- or vitamin-infused yarns and fabrics, effective thermoregulation from sun exposure, and protection from increasingly severe weather events, among other technologies. The advent of smart textiles is creating further utility in this realm as people become more accustomed to incorporating electronics in some form or another into their wearables or other more advanced technical applications. In addition to testing, validating and verifying the continued effectiveness of these and other technologies, consideration must also be given to ensuring that new testing methodologies or refinement of existing ones are following suit in order to accurately measure new aspects associated with performance.

Fundamentally, sustainability refers to doing more with less, but it has become an all-encompassing umbrella term that appears to have transcended products, markets and industries. From the textile perspective, Galphin and Walkuski effectively summarized sustainability as “carbon, fiber and social accounting.” Accounting in this instance is more about the details attributed to specific actions being taken. For example, what are we doing or what is still needed in order to reduce cabon footprints? How can we eliminate microfiber generation and fiber shedding as well as plastic waste globally? And of course, how do we become more socially aware of the impact of the actions we take or maybe do not take? Even increased consideration of the items we purchase and whether collectively our actions will lead towards a more sustainable environment should be taken into account.

Green Products

By all appearances, industries and individuals indeed are beginning to take action. “We’ve seen a big shift in interest towards making the world healthier,” Penegar said. “Everybody wants green products and natural fibers of all types are gaining in interest because consumers are realizing that they don’t want items that may end up in the ocean or a landfill, possibly for a few hundred years. But, unfortunately, not all green fabrics are actually green, so we test.”

Efforts are ongoing to reduce the use of potentially harmful chemicals in dyestuffs and other textile treatments. Several companies have recently announced that they either have, or will, eliminate the use of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances, commonly called PFAS or forever chemicals, from their products. The “reduce, reuse, recycle” movement continues to gain in popularity as does circularity, especially with younger generations as the environmental harm from waste streams is brought to light.

Impact Beyond Textiles

The initial focus of many of these efforts began with apparel, but similar efforts are being found in other industry segments as well. The commercial building industry, certainly in the United States and Europe, has noticeably increased its efforts, and possibly to a degree, confusion, stemming from the bevy of programs currently cited for many new commercial builds. These include, in no particular order, the Health Product Declaration Collaborative, the Living Future Institute, Cradle-to-Cradle, Clean Production Action, Business and Institutional Furniture Manufacturers Association, Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED), International Well Building Institute’s WELL, and the Living Building Challenge (LBC), among other programs and certifications.

The LEED program is probably most recognizable currently with architects, builders and building owners, many of whom are intent on making every effort necessary to be awarded a coveted LEED rating for their buildings. LEED ratings are based on a series of credits or points achieved specific to how that building addresses segments such as climate change, impact on human health and water resources, and how it contributes to supporting biodiversity, a green economy, community and natural resources. The effective use of textiles in building construction can in many cases improve a LEED rating.

In a similar vein, the LBC has upped the ante of LEED by taking a more “holistic approach to building that requires all project stakeholders to consider the real-life cycle impact of design, construction and operation.” From a textile perspective, product transparency is a requirement, but where LEED provides credits for the use of recycled content, LBC goes further requiring that qualified buildings not use any materials, chemicals or elements that are found on its Red List. The list comprises items “known to pose serious risks to living creatures and the greater ecosystem that are prevalent in the building products industry.” The Red List is updated annually and represents the “worst in class” substances. It contains chemical names, trade names and synonyms, as well as chemical abstract service numbers to properly identify the items in question.

Of course, these ongoing and ever evolving activities will continue to be ongoing and ever evolving. As a result, the need to rethink performance and the attributes that define performance in textiles will continue to evolve as well. This ever-changing landscape offers job security for those who deal with the subject on a daily basis. That said, there is one attribute that hasn’t been mentioned since the very beginning of this adventure and is likely to remain the most critical factor — cost.

Unfortunately, sustainable production and virtually all of the aforementioned performance properties do not come free and, in many cases, can be costly! Walkuski and Galphin summed up their presentation by offering: “Sustainability, however you wish to define it, has effectively become the new performance! There is a very real cost associated with sustainability, not only the raw materials and manufacturing costs, but also the costs associated with developing viable solutions. There remains the very real question of worth versus risk versus company initiatives versus customer acceptance and everyone’s continually changing perceptions.”

The old profound truth that “one thing leads to another” seems rather appropriate as the ongoing challenge that every company — whether it be manufacturer or supplier, marketing agency, engineering firm or consultancy — either is facing or will soon be facing are the ultimate questions; What level of risk are they willing to absorb? And how do we actually pay for these efforts? This question includes the necessary work being done to not only rethink performance, but also define and monitor it. Ultimately, the answers may come down to how far is the consumer, as well as the companies involved, willing to go in order to realize the costs and absorb them in some manner or form? Performance, regardless of how it is defined, certainly brings value to those who strive for and appreciate it, but in the grand scheme of business, societal norms, various increasing environmental concerns and consumer sentiment, are we willing to accept the risk or somehow collectively able to pay for it? One certainly hopes so!

March/April 2023

Carbon Fibers From Lignin

Water-spun lignin precursor fibers

DITF has developed an environmentally friendly and economical process for carbon fiber production using lignin as a precursor.

TW Special Report

Carbon fibers are typically produced on an industrial scale using polyacrylonitrile (PAN). The stabilization and carbonization of the fibers takes place with long dwell times in high-temperature furnaces. This production method requires lots of energy and results in expensive finished fiber. In addition, toxic by-products must be separated during manufacturing, which is a costly and energy-intensive procedure.

A novel process developed at Ger-many-based DITF Denkendorf (German Institutes of Textile and Fiber Research) enables large energy savings in all the processing steps. Lignin replaces PAN in the production of precursor fibers, which is converted into carbon fibers in a second process step. Lignin as a starting material for carbon fiber has so far received little attention in industrial production. It is an inexpensive raw material that is available in large quantities and is a waste product during paper production.

Stabilized carbon fiber

New Ways To Carbon Fiber

The new process for producing lignin fibers is based on an aqueous solution of lignin. For this purpose, wood is separated into its components — lignin and cellulose. A sulfite digestion process enables the production of lignosulfonate, which is dissolved in water. An aqueous solution of lignin is then the starting material for spinning the fibers using a dry spinning process.

During spinning, an extruder presses the spinning mass through a nozzle into a heated spinning shaft. The resulting continuous fibers dry quickly and uniformly in the spinning shaft. Lignin fibers spun from an aqueous solution is a completely new and environmentally friendly approach, which does not require the use of solvents or toxic additives.

The following steps for the production of carbon fibers — namely stabilization in hot air and subsequent carbonization in the high-temperature furnace — are similar to those of the usual process when PAN is used as the precursor fiber. However, lignin fibers also show their advantages here because they can be stabilized particularly quickly in the oven with hot air and only require relatively low temperatures for carbonization. The energy savings in these process steps compared with PAN are around 50 percent and represent a real competitive advantage.

Carbonized continuous filament carbon

Lignin Fibers Spun From Water Offer Technical Advantages

The dry spinning process allows high spinning speeds. As a result, much more material is produced in a shorter time than is possible with PAN fibers. This is another competitive advantage, which nevertheless does not allow any compromises to be made on the quality of the lignin precursor fibers — the fibers are in fact extremely homogeneous, have smooth surfaces and no adhesions. Such structural features facilitate further processing into carbon fibers and ultimately also into fiber composites.

In summary, the precursor lignin fibers obtained in the new spinning process show clear advantages over PAN in terms of cost efficiency and environmental compatibility. The mechanical properties of the carbon fibers produced from them, on the other hand, are almost comparable— they are just as strong, resistant and light as is known from commercially available products.

Carbon fibers made from water-spun lignin fibers are likely to be of particular interest for applications in the construction and automotive sectors, which benefit greatly from cost reductions in the production process.

March/April 2023

Researchers Separate Cotton From Polyester In Blended Fabric

NC State researchers investigate using a cocktail of enzymes to reduce textile waste.

By Laura Oleniacz

In a new study, Raleigh, N.C.-based NC State University researchers found they could separate blended cotton and polyester fabric using enzymes — nature’s tools for speeding chemical reactions. Ultimately, they hope their findings will lead to a more efficient way to recycle the fabric’s component materials, thereby reducing textile waste.

However, the researchers also found the process requires more steps if the blended fabric was dyed or treated with chemicals that increase wrinkle resistance.

“We can separate all of the cotton out of a cotton-polyester blend, meaning now we have clean polyester that can be recycled,” said the study’s corresponding author Sonja Salmon, associate professor of textile engineering, chemistry and science at NC State. “In a landfill, the polyester is not going to degrade, and the cotton might take several months or more to break down. Using our method, we can separate the cotton from polyester in less than 48 hours.”

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, consumers throw approximately 11 million tons of textile waste into U.S. landfills each year. Researchers wanted to develop a method of separating the cotton from the polyester so each component material could be recycled.

In the study, researchers used a cocktail of enzymes in a mildly acidic solution to chop up cellulose in cotton. Cellulose is the material that gives structure to plants’ cell walls. The idea is to chop up the cellulose so it will “fall out” out of the blended woven structure, leaving some tiny cotton fiber fragments remaining, along with glucose. Glucose is the biodegradable by-product of degraded cellulose. Then, their process involves washing away the glucose and filtering out the cotton fiber fragments, leaving clean polyester.
“This is a mild process — the treatment is slightly acidic, like using vinegar,” Salmon said. “We also ran it at 50 degrees Celsius, which is like the temperature of a hot washing machine.

“It’s quite promising that we can separate the polyester to a clean level,” Salmon added. “We still have some more work to do to characterize the polyester’s properties, but we think they will be very good because the conditions are so mild. We’re just adding enzymes that ignore the polyester.”

They compared degradation of 100-percent cotton fabric to degradation of cotton and polyester blends, and also tested fabric that was dyed with red and blue reactive dyes and treated with durable press chemicals. In order to break down the dyed materials, the researchers had to increase the amount of time and enzymes used. For fabrics treated with durable press chemicals, they had to use a chemical pre-treatment before adding the enzymes.

“The dye that you choose has a big impact on the potential degradation of the fabric,” said the study’s lead author Jeannie Egan, a graduate student at NC State. “Also, we found the biggest obstacle so far is the wrinkle-resistant finish. The chemistry behind that creates a significant block for the enzyme to access the cellulose. Without pre-treating it, we achieved less than 10 percent degradation, but after, with two enzyme doses, we were able to fully degrade it, which was a really exciting result.”

Researchers said the polyester could be recycled, while the slurry of cotton fragments could be valuable as an additive for paper or useful addition to composite materials. They’re also investigating whether the glucose could be used to make biofuels.

“The slurry is made of residual cotton fragments that resist a very powerful enzymatic degradation,” Salmon said. “It has potential value as a strengthening agent. For the glucose syrup, we’re collaborating on a project to see if we can feed it into an anaerobic digester to make biofuel. We’d be taking waste and turning it into bioenergy, which would be much better than throwing it into a landfill.”

The study, “Enzymatic textile fiber separation for sustainable waste processing,” was published in Resources, Environment and Sustainability. Co-authors included Siyan Wang, Jialong Shen, Oliver Baars and Geoffrey Moxley. Funding was provided by the Environmental Research and Education Foundation, Kaneka Corp. and the Depart-ment of Textile Engineering, Chemistry and Science at NC State.


Editor’s Note: Laura Oleniacz is Public Communications Specialist at NC State News Services.


March/April 2023

March/April 2023

High Point, N.C.-based Culp Inc. — along with its consolidated subsidiaries, CULP — has promoted Stephen Dudek to manager of Business Development for Culp Home Fashions (CHF), the company’s mattress fabrics division. He reports to Jeff Veach. Culp also recently hired Pat Rosser as the vice president of Global Operations for CHF. In addition, Culp has announced the retirement of CHF Senior Vice President of sales and marketing Mike Cottonaro, effective April 30, 2023. He will work closely with CHF division President Tommy Bruno and Veach to ensure a smooth transition.

Matt Dunbar

Matt Dunbar was named president of Minneapolis-based Cargill’s cotton business within its North American agricultural supply chain. He is responsible for driving Cargill’s end-to-end strategy in the cotton space.

Israel-based Delta Galil Industries Ltd. has appointed Mark Stocker president of the Delta Galil Branded Division. He reports to CEO Isaac Dabah.

Rand Ledbetter has announced he will retire after a 20-year career with Herculite Products Inc., Emigsville, Pa.

HanesBrands, Winston-Salem, N.C., named Lorenzo Moretti president of Champion Europe. The company also appointed Mark Irvin to its board of directors; and Bobby J. Griffin announced his retirement from the board when his current term expires at the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders.

Amezcua (left) with Hooimeijer

Karl Mayer North America —a subsidiary of the Germany-based Karl Mayer Group based in Greensboro, N.C. —has named Mariano Amezcua president. He replaces Tony Hooimeijer who recently retired after leading the division for almost 20 years.

Hudson, N.C.-based Sattler Outdura — a division of The Sattler Group, Austria — has named Chris Caldwell and Julie Talbert sales managers for Outdura. Both report to Sattler Outdura CEO Ulrich Tombuelt.

Lubbock, Texas-based cotton producer Shawn Holladay was elected chairman of the National Cotton Council (NCC), Memphis, Tenn., for 2023. Joe Nicosia, a cotton mer-chant in Cordova, Tenn., was elected vice chairman. In addition, Dr. Andrew Jordan was honored with the Harry S. Baker Distinguished Service Award; and the late Kenneth Hood was named the recipient of the Oscar Johnston Lifetime Achievement Award during NCC’s 2023 annual meeting.

Dr. Portia Yarborough has joined Cincinnati-based Michelman as chief  science and sustainability officer.

Memphis, Tenn.-based Cotton Council International (CCI) — the export promotion arm of the NCC — elected the following officers for 2023 at its recent annual meeting: Steve Dyer, president; Carlos C. Garcia, chairman; J. Lee Cromley, first vice president; Carlo Bocardo, second vice president; Gary Adams, secretary; Bruce Atherly, assistant secretary; and John C. King III, treasurer. The following people were newly elected as CCI directors: Aaron Pena; Gene Seale; Neeraj Rana; Nick Kastle; Wesley Rentz; and Matt Dunbar. The following people were re-elected as CCI directors for 2023: Pro-ducers — Philip F. Edwards III, Barry W. Evans, John F. Lindamood, Richard Gaona, Matthew R. Hyneman, Neal Isbell and Paul “Paco” Ollerton; Ginner— George G. LaCour Jr.; Merchant — Beau Stephenson; Cooperatives— Frederick Barrier, Donald A. Robinson and Kevin Brinkley; Warehouseman— Vance C. Shoaf; and Manufacturers — Robin Perkins and James Martin.

The Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry (INDA), Cary, N.C., has named Mark Snider chief market and industry analyst. In addition, the organization recently welcomed six new people to its board of directors: Ricardo Fasolo, managing vice president, Fitesa Inc.; Neil Johnson, president, AstenJohnson; Chris Roeder, director – Strategy, Marketing & Innovation, Global Cellulose Fibers, International Paper; Dr. Paul E. Rollin Jr., senior principal – Global Hygiene, ExxonMobil Product Solutions Co.; Jodi Russell, vice president R&D, Cleaning Innovation, Packaging & Sustainability, The Clorox Co.; and Julie Schertell, president and CEO, Mativ.

Spartanburg, S.C.-based Polartec®, a Milliken & Company brand, recently promoted Dr. Ramesh Kesh and Eric Yung. Dr. Kesh now oversees all Polartec business units as well as Government and Defense business units in addition to his role as senior vice president at Milliken & Company. Yung was named vice president of Milliken & Company and managing director of Polartec.

March/April 2023

Lofty Fleece Shedding Goals

Polartec® has engineered Shed Less technology to produce fleece fabrics that reduce home laundry fiber fragment shedding.

By Rachael S. Davis, Executive Editor

Think fleece, and Polartec® likely comes to mind. The words Polartec and fleece fabrics have become ubiquitous over the years. The company, today a Milliken & Company brand, introduced its original PolarFleece in 1981. But as fleece fabrics have been caught in the crosshairs of the microfiber pollution issue, Polartec sought to innovate and develop a new fleece fabric that would reduce home laundry fiber fragment shedding.

Its new process, Shed Less, comprises yarn, knitting, chemistry and manufacturing techniques to create a fabric that reduces home laundry fiber fragment shedding by an average of 85 percent compared to the baseline fabric, according to the company. The fabric was tested using the American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists’ (AATCC’s) TM212-2021 test method for fiber fragment release during home laundering.

Shed Less produces a lofted fiber —required to impart a soft hand to the fabric — that resists breaking and rubbing off during home laundering. All the other properties fleece is known for —such as warmth, light weight and breathability —also are maintained using the Shed Less manufacturing process.

“Polartec has a long tradition of Eco-Engineering its products to reduce their environmental footprint,” said Dr. Ramesh Kesh, senior vice president, Milliken & Company. “Shed Less is the latest progression of these efforts and the result of many years of research and development.

“While performance fabrics contribute a small percentage of the fiber fragments shed by the global textile industry, Polartec has been researching root causes and mitigation strategies for many years,” Dr. Kesh added. “Shed Less Fleece is a natural progression of this curiosity toward our goal of reducing fiber fragment shedding to near zero in all of our performance fabrics.”

“In 2016 we began looking into how we might test for fiber loss because there wasn’t a lot of research on the issue,” said Aimee LaValley, Polartec Textile Development, Dye and Chemistry manager. “This led to new products like Polartec Power Air™, new manufacturing processes, as well as our participation in the TextileMission workgroup to study the issue on an interdisciplinary basis.”

TextileMission, a three-year collaborative initiative of academia and industry to reduce the impact of textile microplastics, was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

The Association of the German Sporting Goods Industry, Hochschule Niederrhein— University of Applied Science; TU Dresden — Institute of Water Chemistry; Vaude Sport; WWF Germany; Adidas AG; Henkel AG; Miele & CIE; and Polartec LLC were some of the founding partners of this collaborative effort.

In addition to modifying its manufacturing techniques to produce Shed Less, Polartec has installed vacuum and filtering systems for surface finishing machinery to reduce the spread of fiber fragments. The company also upcycles all fabric waste to be used in other products.

Polartec 200 Series Fleece is the first fabric to benefit from this new manufacturing process. The Shed Less Fleece is currently available in the United States and the technology will be applied to other fabric platforms and worldwide manufacturing locations in the near future.


For more information about Polartec’s Shed less, please visit Polartec.com.


March/April 2023

U.S. Textiles: Leadership Development

By Jim Borneman, Editor In Chief

A common topic of conversation among U.S. textile executives is a shared concern about the development of future industry leaders. Often the question is focused on, “What can the industry do to attract bright young people of all stripes that will advance the industry into the future?”

This question affects existing companies but also the development of new companies chasing innovations and enhancing the definition of U.S. textiles.

This issue of Textile World features two articles that may help point to possible solutions.

One is the continuing developments at the Conover, N.C-based Manufacturing Solutions Center (MSC), part of Catawba Valley Community College. The MSC’s mission is captured in the article’s subhead: “The center’s Incubator Program is seeking entrepreneurs looking to realize their dreams.” The MSC assists new companies to manufacture product onsite with access to the MSC’s equipment, resources and services.

Companies including Nufabrx, InnovaKnits, Yu Apparel Corp. and Evolved by Nature, currently take advantage of the Incubator Program. Their stories are inspiring and illustrate how the MSC assists these start-ups in realizing their vision — offering pilot-scale manufacturing and providing necessary shared resources that would be out of reach for a typical start-up.

A new 75,000-square-foot facility was recently constructed adjacent to the current space —Manufacturing Solutions Center II — a partnership between the City of Conover, MSC, Catawba Valley Community College and private investment firm Whiskbroom. The additional space extends the opportunity to more entrepreneurs.

TW also spoke with Dr. Andre West, associate professor, and director of the Zeis Textiles Extension (ZTE) at Raleigh, N.C.-based NC State University’s Wilson College of Textiles, about the recently announced Flex Factory.

West explained that the Flex Factory is a two-phase project with phase one, “The Prototype Lab,” providing an environment for “students, researchers, start-ups and industry where ideation, innovation, collaboration with a focus on sustainable manufacturing can thrive.
“Phase II involves a complete space up fit and renovation to bridge our current Senior Design course space with the Flex Factory space and add additional features including a materials library and conference rooms.” Phase II is expected to be complete by the end of 2024.

The Flex Factory concept forges a strong link between textile students and the realities of industry and entrepreneurship.

West stated that there are fours things necessary for the Flex Factory’s success. First, assistance with acquiring the latest textile equipment – for the Flex Factory to be a “working showcase for cutting-edge equipment, especially equipment with a small footprint.”

Second, projects from industry are needed to challenge the students and faculty.

Third is funding to make Phase II happen at the university.

And lastly, industry engagement is encouraged because “ … seeing it first-hand with the machines running is the best way to understand the vision.”

MSC and the Flex Factory are both first-class examples of leadership development — honing new companies and students, soon to be the industry’s new blood, into catalysts of change enhancing the U.S. textile industry.

March/April 2023

Renewcell, Lyocell Fiber Producer CTA Green Fibre Sign Letter of Intent

STOCKHOLM/SHANGHAI — March28, 2023 — The Sweden-based textile-to-textile recycling company Renewcell has signed a Letter of Intent with China Textile Academy Green Fibre Co. Ltd., a China-based lyocell fiber producer, concerning a long-term commercial collaboration around man-made cellulosic fiber production. The agreement affirms the two companies’ intent to work together to supply lyocell textile fibers made using Circulose®, the 100-percent recycled textile pulp made by Renewcell, to global fashion brands in the coming years. The agreement has been facilitated by Ekman Group, Renewcell’s exclusive global trading partner.

Patrik Lundström, Renewcell’s CEO, commented: ”With this agreement, we take a new step in demonstrating the applicability of Circulose in commercial-scale production of lyocell fibers. Lyocell is a high quality, low-impact fiber using closed loop production process which is highly sought after among our fashion brand partners that will now soon be available incorporating Circulose recycled from textile waste. I am impressed by the innovative capacity and leadership of CTA Green Fibre and look forward to working together with them to make fashion circular together.”

Yu Hanjiang, Chairman of China Textile Academy Green Fiber Co., Ltd., commented: Renewcell is an outstanding innovative enterprise, and both parties are cooperating fully to promote Circulose®。 The commercial application of Circulose in the field of Lyocell will provide sustainable and innovative materials for the fashion industry, with broad prospects.”

The Letter of Intent signed between Renewcell and CTA Green Fibre provides the framework for an upcoming offtake agreement between the parties. The future legally binding offtake agreement will set out commercial terms for the delivery of 18,000 tonnes of Circulose® dissolving pulp to CTA Green Fibre over five years. CTA Green Fibre intends to use Circulose® as feedstock in the production of lyocell fibers to be supplied to textile manufacturers and fashion brands worldwide.

Posted March 28, 2023

Source: Renewcell

Better Cotton Hosts Multistakeholder Event In West Africa

ABIDJAN, Côte d’Ivoire — March 28, 2023 — Today, Better Cotton — the world’s largest cotton sustainability initiative — will host a multi-stakeholder event in Abidjan, Cote D’Ivoire to explore the potential for new programs and partnerships across West and Central Africa.

Taking place at the Pullman Hotel, Plateau, the event will enable key stakeholders across the region to share their experiences and perspectives on the future of sustainable cotton production on the continent amidst a rapidly changing climate. Delegates will also have the opportunity to learn more about Better Cotton Programs and the long-term ambitions that underpin its 2030 Strategy.

Representatives from leading cotton companies and organizations including Solidaridad, The Sustainable Trade Initiative [IDH], ECOM, OlamAgri, APROCOT-CI, amongst several others, will participate in discussions to explore opportunities and challenges regarding sustainability in the cotton sector as well as engaging with stakeholders from the cocoa sector for cross commodity learnings.

Better Cotton is committed to building upon its presence across Africa to enable smallholder farmers to mitigate climate change and adopt a continuous improvement approach to sustainable agricultural practice. With a membership spanning farm to retailer and brand level, Better Cotton is strategically positioned to meet supply with increasing demand. At the farm-level, programme partners provide training and resources to small holder farmers to enable social and environmental improvements that culminate in more climate-resilient operations which in turn assist the livelihoods of the farmers.

Better Cotton is proactively engaging with sector stakeholders across West and Central Africa, in countries such as Chad, Cote D’Ivoire, Burkina Faso, Benin, Togo and Cameroon,  to develop multistakeholder collaboration to start impactful Better Cotton programmes.

In November, several West African cotton producing countries, including Benin, Burkina Faso, Mali and Chad — often referred to as the Cotton-4 — called for supportto strengthen the resilience of their cotton industries at the World Trade Organisation’s Cotton Days event.

A report from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) at that time estimated that cotton production would increase in the four nations over the coming years, provided appropriate action is taken to promote sustainability standards, empower women and youth and reduce trade-distorting subsidies.

Damien Sanfilippo, senior director of Programmes, Better Cotton, said: “The event signifies an important opportunity for cotton stakeholders in Africa to engage with one another and explore partnerships needed to ensure market access and improved sustainability for cotton growers.”

Posted March 28, 2022

Source: Better Cotton

Sponsors