Fenner Dunlop Worldwide Orders SMIT Weaving Machines

Fenner Dunlop Worldwide, England, recently placed an order for 12 GS900 rapier weaving machines
from Italy-based SMIT Textile. With twelve facilities in eight countries, Fenner Dunlop
manufactures a range of conveyor belting for many different industries and applications from coal
mining and power plants to package handling and process automation. The company’s facilities in the
United States Georgia Duck Conveyor Belting, Scottdale, Ga.; and Scandura Conveyor Belting,
Charlotte already use 21 SMIT looms for their operations.

fennersmit

The new machines are destined for Georgia Duck Conveyor Belting’s facilities. Delivery has
commenced and will be completed by the end of November. The GS900 representing the evolution of
SMITs G6300 rapier weaving machine has gained wide acceptance and a strong foothold in the
technical fabrics market, according to SMIT. The machines mechatronic solutions offer enhanced
versatility and efficiency. The company reports it also offers excellent insertion rates, and its
compact construction gives it a sturdy frame that guarantees vibration-free running, even at high
speeds.

October 2005

Spotlight On Turkey


Hightex 2005 attracted visitors from Eastern Europe, the Middle and Near East, and North
Africa.



T
he

premiere edition of the Istanbul
International Technical Textiles and Nonwoven Trade Fair (Hightex 2005) recently was held at the
new Istanbul World Trade Center. Organized by Turkey-based Teknik Ltd., the show attracted 250
exhibitors — 130 of them from abroad — and almost 9,000 visitors from 50 countries — including
7,507 from Turkey and 1,413 from such regions as Eastern Europe, the Middle and Near East, and
North Africa, among others. The large number of Turkish visitors from 59 different cities was
evidence of the local demand for information about these growing sectors.

Many attendees said this event was the right place for people who are participating in the
conventional textiles sector but are seeking alternative ways to invest.


A Growing Sector

Nonwovens and technical textiles used
globally in diverse applications such as health care, construction, automotive, apparel,
agriculture and packaging — many of which have impressive growth rates — drew the interest of
visitors.

According to organizers, when increasing competition in the nonwovens and technical textiles
sectors is considered, the quality of exhibitors and visitors at Hightex clearly proved Turkey can
become an important producer and market for these sectors.

Regarded as an indication of movement in Turkey from traditional textiles towards technical
textiles — production in which high technology is utilized — the exhibition was perceived by both
exhibitors and visitors as a good opportunity to increase awareness of the nonwovens sector, share
information, improve trade in world nonwovens markets and increase profitability.


Advanced Technology

“There are entrepreneurs in Turkey
who participate in industry with this technology,” said Necip Güney, sales and marketing director,
Teknik Ltd. “They recycle the waste bottles and garment waste and, after processing, they provide
them to the textile and garment industry. We have gathered these native industrialists with the
leading foreign technology and industry giants in our exhibition.

“Our aim was to join the nonwoven and technical textiles sectors, which are developing
rapidly and becoming the focus of investment, with the technology developers in America, Europe and
other centers all over the world. We believe that new opportunities and new customers will emerge
in this, the world’s fastest-developing market,” Güney added.

Ümit Vural, director of operations, Teknik Ltd., said Teknik is very proud of organizing
Hightex 2005 following the International Textile Machinery Exhibition (ITM), held last year in
Istanbul, which he said is among the most important and largest international exhibitions in the
world. He added that having exhibitors at this global level makes Hightex even more essential.

 


Hightex Activities

The 2nd International Technical
Textiles Congress, held concurrently with Hightex with the cooperation of the Dokuz Eylül
University Textile Engineering Department, brought together foreign and local researchers and
companies working in the field.

The congress aimed to guide textile industrialists currently producing or planning to
produce in this field. “Smart” clothes; high-performance fibers; packaging, industrial, protective
and automotive textiles; as well as filtration, were discussed.

The Innovation Relay Center-Ege held a series of Cooperation and Technology Relay meetings
during the show in an effort to bring together machinery manufacturers, customers and partners in
the European Union.

The Hightex 2005 opening ceremony featured Turkish government officials and leading textile
representatives.


Future Events

Turkey is of growing interest as an
exhibition site, as it links Europe and Asia, providing access to strong markets in Turkey, Iran,
Syria and surrounding regions.

Hightex organizers continue to make a diligent effort to promote Istanbul as an attractive
location for textile exhibitions — one that offers good value to exhibitors and visitors alike and
an opportunity to participate in a growing market.

Hightex will be held every other year, with the next show scheduled for 2007. The next
edition of ITM will take place June 27 through July 2, 2006, at the CNR Expo Fair and Congress
Centre in Istanbul.



October 2005

Farm Trade Proposals Concern Cotton Growers

A pledge by US Trade Representative
Rob Portman to make “deep cuts” in US farm tariffs and other subsidies has the US cotton industry
on edge. At a recent meeting in Geneva with trade ministers from some of the world’s largest
countries, Portman promised major concessions in order to get the Doha Round of trade
liberalization talks back on track. While urging other developed countries to match the US
proposals, Portman said developing countries also must be prepared to offer concessions
commensurate with their ability to contribute to the cause of free trade

Woods Eastland, president of the National Cotton Council, said Portman’s proposals represent
a “very aggressive stance” and would require significant cuts in US farm programs if agreed to by
members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and Congress. Warning that there must be “
corresponding gains in market access,” Eastland said, “The troubling aspect for the US cotton
industry is that China – the world’s largest cotton market – continues to seek special treatment in
the WTO so it can avoid market access concessions.” In addition, he said, the US cotton industry
cannot allow countries with highly competitive agricultural products to avoid making concessions “
simply based on their self-declaration as a developing country.”

Regardless of what happens, he said, it is imperative Congress provides programs that result
in “an effective safety net” for US cotton producers.



October 2005


Chilewich Adds To Plynyl Line

Chilewich LLC, New York City, has
added 18-inch modular tile to its line of Plynyl woven vinyl floor coverings.

Plynyl Tiles feature the company’s Basketweave style woven vinyl fabric face, which has been
re-engineered to have sharp, clean tile edges; and a backing comprising a two-layered vinyl cushion
and an intermediary nonwoven stabilizing layer. Available in eight colorways, the tiles may be
installed in either a uniform or a random configuration. They have 20-percent recycled content and
are themselves recyclable as well.


tiles



Chilewich also now offers Solid Shag tufted vinyl floor covering in three colors — black,
gunmetal and lime — that may be used independently or in coordination with striped combinations in
the Plynyl Shag collection launched last year.

October 2005

Researchers Develop Anti-Counterfeiting Nanofiber

Researchers at North Carolina State University (NCSU), Raleigh, and the University of Puerto Rico,
Mayaguez, have created a nanoscale fiber that can be incorporated into a textile or a paper
document to verify its authenticity. The alien nanofiber could be used by branded textile
manufacturers to protect against piracy by unlicensed competitors. Using an electrospinning
process, Juan Hinestroza, Ph.D., assistant professor of textile engineering, chemistry and science,
NCSU; and Carlos Rinaldi, Ph.D., assistant professor of chemical engineering, University of Puerto
Rico, have developed the nanofiber, which has a diameter of approximately 150 nanometers. The fiber
contains smaller nanoparticles with a magnetic, electrical or optical signature that can be
identified by a scanning device.

“These fibers can be easily incorporated [using] existing textile manufacturing facilities,”
Hinestroza said. Hinestroza and Rinaldi have been assisted in their work by graduate student Carola
Barrera and high school student Aldo Briano. The research is supported by a National Science
Foundation Nanoscale Exploratory Research grant and by the NC State Nanotechnology Steering
Committee.

October 2005

US-Chinese Textile Negotiations Break Down

US and Chinese trade negotiations once again have failed to reach agreement on a comprehensive
textile trade agreement, and the two sides seem to be further apart than ever. An impasse has been
reached on the duration of any agreement, the rate of quota growth and the base that would be used
in determining quota growth. The United States is pressing for an agreement that would extend until
2008, when the authority to use a safeguard mechanism to impose quotas when there is market
disruption expires. The United States reportedly is willing to permit annual growth of 10 to 14
percent, while on the other hand, China wants an agreement modeled after one it reached earlier
this year with the European Union. That agreement runs only through 2007, and calls for quota
growth limits of 8 to 12 percent.

As the talks broke down, US Special Textile Negotiator David Spooner said, We have not come
to an agreement that meets the needs of our domestic manufacturers and retailers. He said the
overall goal of the United States is to reach a longer-term solution that will permit greater
stability in textile and apparel trade. He noted the US government has been using its rights under
China’s World Trade Organization accession agreement to invoke safeguards in cases of market
disruption or the threat of market disruption and we will continue to do so as appropriate.

A coalition of US textile and apparel manufacturers and labor, which has filed more than
two-dozen safeguard petitions, commended the US textile negotiators for their continuing efforts to
reach a fair agreement, while claiming that China’s continuing intransigence makes it increasingly
difficult to reach an agreement before the end of the year. Cass Johnson, president of the National
Council of Textile Organizations, said China has returned to a position of delay and no compromise
by insisting on terms of an agreement that were impossible for the US government to accept. Auggie
Tantillo, executive director of the American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition, charged that
China’s failure to negotiate reasonably ensures there will be an atmosphere of uncertainty for
anyone seeking to import textile goods into the United States.

Both textile manufacturers and importers have been hoping for an agreement that would reduce
that uncertainty, but at the moment that appears to be out of reach, and no date has been set to
resume negotiations.

October 2005

NEPOM Patrol Boats Use Dyneema® In Armor System

The Netherlands-based DSM Dyneema
will supply Dyneema® UD unidirectional cross-ply composite as part of the armoring solution for
patrol boats operated by the Sea Police National System (NEPOM) division of the Brazilian Federal
Police. Approximately 11 armored boats will be built to patrol the port of Rio de Janeiro, with the
first having been delivered earlier this year. Deliveries will continue through 2008.

Brazil-based AXIA Blindagens designed the armor system, which comprises Dyneema and a steel
plate. The system offers a lightweight solution that meets National Institute of Justice Level 3
criteria for protection from multi-hit impact.

“[T]he tough environment that these patrol boats will face brought us to select the best
material both from the ballistic viewpoint and the excellent resistance against salt water and
[ultraviolet] light,” said Franco Giaffone, president and senior partner, AXIA Blindagens.

October 2005

Chinese Imports Soared In First Half Of This Year


A
lthough textile and apparel imports from all sources in the first half of this year rose
by a relatively modest 10 percent over the comparable period of 2004, Chinese imports were up by 47
percent, including a 125-percent increase in apparel. China currently accounts for 29 percent of US
imports of textiles and apparel.

Some of the increase was at the expense of North American Free Trade Agreement partners
Mexico and Canada, with Mexico showing a decline of 4 percent and Canada a drop of 7 percent,
including 22 percent in apparel trade. China’s growth also appeared to be at the expense of Hong
Kong, Taiwan and South Korea — each of which showed declines in apparel exports in the range of 33
percent to 37 percent, and similar declines in textile exports.

The Caribbean Basin countries showed a modest 7-percent increase, mostly in apparel; textiles
were off by 8 percent. Other Central American countries included in the recently approved Dominican
Republic-Central American Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA) also showed a gain of 7 percent. Textile
trade officials expect a much larger increase once the free trade agreement has time to take
effect.


Europeans Have Problems Too

Although the European Union negotiated an agreement with China earlier this year placing quotas
with annual rates of growth ranging from 8 percent to 12.5 percent on 10 product categories through
2007, that agreement quickly ran into trouble. It seems China quickly overshipped many of the
products that were placed under quota.

Although EU Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson said he supports the original agreement, he is
seeking some way to permit some of the stranded products to gain entry. European textile
manufacturers that are represented by the Brussels-based European Apparel and Textile Organization
(EURATEX) are strongly opposed to any changes in the original agreement. EURATEX President Filiep
Libeert said, “No one should claim that they were unaware of the risks involved in placing orders
for huge quantities of Chinese goods for delivery in 2005,” although he said his organization would
support an effort to resolve the problem providing it is done “within the framework of the original
agreement.”

Under a special agreement, about half of the embargoed goods will be permitted to enter above
and beyond the quotas, and the remaining 50 percent will be charged against 2006 quotas.

filip

Filiep Libeert, president, European Apparel and Textile Organization


Solutions To China Trade Problems Sought

Just about everyone involved — textile manufacturers, importers, retailers and governments — is
continuing to probe ways to resolve problems with US/China textile trade, but there clearly are no
easy answers. Importers are unanimous in their desire to get the respective governments to take the
steps necessary to ensure order and predictability to US/China trade. As one importer put it, “If
we place an order, we would like to know it can be delivered.”

Importers, who heaved sighs of relief when import quotas were removed last January, are
bitterly disappointed that some of the quotas have been restored and more are likely to come. They
say trade should not be restrained when there is no solid proof imports are disrupting the US
market, and they particularly would like to see import quotas end once and for all by 2008.

Above and beyond the quota issue, the Washington-based National Council of Textile
Organizations (NCTO) has a wish list that it hopes would lead to more of a permanent solution to
problems with Chinese trade. Saying that quotas are at best a “temporary fix,” the NCTO is seeking
action from the US and Chinese governments to combat what textile manufacturers view as an array of
unfair trade practices. These include such things as currency manipulation, subsidization of
industries, the use of non-performing loans to fund textile expansion, tax holidays and subsidized
freight and energy costs.

The NCTO cites United Nations data that show China’s exports of apparel are 58 percent below
the average for the rest of the world. There is not much hope at this time the Chinese government
will take any meaningful actions to control its export trade. It apparently will act only when it
feels enough pressure from the US government, importers and textile manufacturers to bring about
orderly trade.

There is little hope China’s recent increase of its yuan against the dollar will have much of
an impact on what US manufacturers say is as much as a 40-percent subsidy for Chinese imports.
Legislation to impose a 27-percent tax on Chinese imports to help offset that subsidy is not likely
to be enacted. The best hope for US textile manufacturers lies in greater use of US antidumping and
countervailing duty laws that permit the US government to impose punitive tariffs on goods when it
can be shown they are being illegally dumped on the US market. At the present time, those duties
cannot be used against non-market economies, but there is legislation in Congress that would change
that.

While the antidumping and countervailing duty process is expensive and time-consuming, it has
been used with some success in the past with market economies.

The NCTO also reported it will seek relief through the World Trade Organization (WTO), which
has the power to address illegal subsidies and other unfair trade practices. That process also is
time-consuming and uncertain, but it has worked on occasion.

The NCTO also will ask the WTO to extend the right to use a safeguard mechanism to impose
quotas on Chinese imports beyond 2008, when that authority currently is due to expire.

With the US government continuing to pursue bilateral and regional free trade agreements, the
textile association warned it will oppose any agreement that permits non-participating countries to
benefit from the special treatment and greater access to the US market under the free trade
agreements.

The NCTO remains hopeful the recently negotiated DR-CAFTA will divert Chinese production to
this hemisphere, where it will be necessary to use some US-made textiles in order to qualify for
the duty-free benefits.


Federal Trade Commission Clarifies Thread Count Rule

In response to a recent request from the Boston-based National Textile Association (NTA), the
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has issued a statement clarifying the way it expects textile
manufacturers to measure thread count in their advertising and labels. The request was made because
NTA member companies felt some companies are providing thread counts that are misleading. The FTC
agreed, and in its opinion said some manufacturers have inflated their thread counts by counting
each individual ply. In its statement, the FTC said that could be deceptive and misleading to
consumers because many consumers associate a high thread count with high-quality products.

karl“Thread
count is the way many shoppers compare bedding products,” said Karl Spilhaus, president, NTA. “This
clarification by the FTC will help ensure consumers can shop with confidence when products are
labeled and marketed properly.”

The FTC said that if a manufacturer or retailer identifies a product manufactured with plied
yarns, the label and advertising should state, for example, “300 thread count made using two-ply
yarns.” To label a such a product as “600 thread count” would be deceptive.


October 2005

 

Temafa Joins Dilo Group

Germany-based Dilo System Group has
acquired a majority interest in Temafa Maschinenfabrik GmbH, also based in Germany. Temafa will
continue to operate as an independent company under the Dilo Group umbrella.

Dilo expects Temafa’s machinery program for natural fiber processing, including fiber
extraction plants, will allow it to take advantage of opportunities to offer complete lines for
natural fiber nonwovens, especially for the automotive sector. Dilo anticipates demand for such
products will grow as a result of rising oil prices and the increasing importance of ecological
considerations.

October 2005

The Roaring Twenties Recession Boom Depression

The Roaring Twenties:Recession, Boom, DepressionThe Twenties were years of boom and bust, of
revulsion at the thought of war, years of the Jazz Age, hip flasks, gang war, Al Capone, years of
millions of immigrants, and a postwar baby boom that would raise the population by 34.7%, to 123
million the 1930 census.The U. S. Senate rejected President Woodrow Wilson’s vision of a League of
Nations to keep the peace, and he passed ineffectively into history while a cigar-smoking,
womanizing small town publisher, Warren G. Harding, succeeded him, only to die of an embolism early
in his term and leave to Calvin Coolidge the heritage of scandals in the Justice, Navy, Interior
Departments, and the Veterans Bureau. Coolidge said little; the spotlight was on his Secretary of
Commerce, Herbert Hoover, the “Great Engineer” who had so efficiently managed civilian war relief
in Europe and was now the darling of business for his many helpful innovations. He would be elected
president in 1928.The post war boom of 1918-1920 was followed in 1921 by an 18-month recession
brought on by tight credit, a glutted market, heavy inventories and a sharp drop in export trade.
Pay cuts were general, business failures soared. For farmers, the recession would continue into the
Depression years of the Thirties. Cotton went from 16 cents a pound in 1920 to 9.5 cents in 1930.
Growth in such industries as coal, lumber and flour milling was flat.1920 Most Prosperous”What new
developments for the textile industry will the year 1920 bring forth” The Reporter asked in the
first issue of the new year. “As 1918 saw the end of the Great War, the year just completed will be
remembered as a period of readjustment, with business almost at an ebb from the signing of the
Armistice until March or April, and then gradually improving until, by the end of the year, the
textile mills were found to be enjoying a remarkable prosperity, even surpassing that noted during
the war1920 is likely to be one of the most prosperous years in the history of the textile
industry.”In Europe, the British were worried about the assurance of cotton supply for the
Lancashire mills. -Can the U.S. supply us” asked a columnist from Manchester, going on to promote
the growing of cotton within the Empire. His question was timely, for the Sea Island crop was down
from 125,000 bales to 7,000 bales due to a devastating hurricane and the boll weevil, threatening
the supply of fine fabrics for the tailors of Saville Row. The door was open for Egyptian
cotton.Trucks In The MillIn the U.S., the big boom was in the automotive industry, which moved to
first place in both value of product and value added by manufacture. Detroit and other auto centers
would turn out 2,798,737 passenger cars in 1929. By 1930, the census would show 4,135,000 autos,
900,000 trucks and 920,000 tractors on the road and in the field. The production of tires and inner
tubes doubled. Gasoline production quadrupled.A page one Reporter headline exhorted: “Let’s Go! To
The Show, We Mean!” The show was the 1920 automobile show in Boston, an event considered of vital
importance by The Reporter which discussed the merits of the trucks to be shown, and the savings
they offered the mills.Also much on the mind of The Reporter’s editors was the lift truck and its
potential for saving space, time, and manpower, especially in the warehouse.Highly desirable, said
The Reporter, was the one-ton truck with swivel lights, pneumatic tires (early trucks ran on solid
rubber tires) and “a thoroughly proven power tire pump” for use on flats.Lightfast Dyes Help
Industry ThriveThe chemical industry was on a steady growth pattern; domestic producers held onto
the dyestuff market. The American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists was organized in
1921 with 200 charter members. Because of their successful production of colors fast to light and
washing, the printing machine was making a comeback.In other textile laboratories, researchers
inspired by the success of “artificial silk” were working on other man-made fibers that would reach
market a decade later. Meanwhile, production of artificial silk, now called rayon, zoomed from
three million pounds in 1919, to 33 million in 1929.The ice-box, the wood-burning cook stove, the
hand-cranked Victrola for records were giving way to products of the new electrical firms. During
the decade, sales of major appliances rose from $109 million to $268 million; of small appliances,
from $71 million to $106 million; of radios, from $15 million to $338 million. Sales of industrial
electrical appliances went from $46 million to $976 million.Education was becoming more common.
Where there had been only 111,000 high school graduates in 1910, and 231,000 in 1920, by 1930,
there were 592,000.Doctors were becoming better trained, and “vitamin” was the health buzz word.
Medical researchers were inching toward the “miracle drugs” that would reach the public in the
Thirties. The iron lung, developed in 1928, meant life for hundreds of polio victims. By 1930, life
expectancy for men was up from 53 to 58 years, and for women, from 54 to 61 years. The ‘flickers”
were maturing. The Technicolor process was perfected with the in 1922, although it was rarely used
by movie producers because of expense. American Telephone and Telegraph Co. achieved television
transmission from New York to Washington in 1927 although commercial application was far away. In
October, 1927, the first full length sound movie, “The Jazz Singer” with Al Jolson, opened in New
York and ran nationwide in 1928. This ushered in a new era in entertainment, with its massive
influence on the fashions which move textiles out of the stores.Staple Apparel Gives Way To
FashionBefore the World War 1, 80% of mill production had been staples. As the Twenties moved on,
more and more farmers acquired automobiles for the Saturday trip to town and to the movies.
Imitation of the fashions shown on the silver screen was inevitable, and staples began to fade as
the auto/movie influence gained strength.Charles A. Lindbergh flew the Atlantic solo in 1927,
becoming a national hero. He went on to survey the transoceanic routes to be followed by Pan
American’s Clipper planes and later by the workhorse DC-3.Cotton Picker InventedFor the mills, the
most significant invention of the period, even if not recognized at the time, was the development
in 1927 by the Rust brothers of the mechanical cotton picker. Before long, the ginning labs of the
Agriculture Department would be dealing with problems of trash in machine-picked cotton, and card
room overseers would be swearing.The years just after the war were marked by considerable
apprehension over the spread of communism from Russia, which was pumping out propaganda calling for
world revolution. A bomb explosion in Wall Street, the roundup of some 2,700 suspected reds by
Attorney General Palmer’s forces and the absorption of the IWVV into the U.S. Communist party fed
the flames of suspicion.These concerns, plus fear of the immigrants landing at Ellis Island, proved
fertile ground for the mushroom growth of the Ku Klux Klan which claimed five million members in
the mid-Twenties, terrorized hundreds of small towns and exercised considerable political power in
Indiana, Oklahoma and Texas. Exposure of their acts of terror by national magazines and
prosecutions for beatings and burnings turned public opinion against the hooded mob so that by 1930
membership had dropped to 9,000. The textile industry could easily afford the loss of the sheet
sales.But, there were grounds for the fears that had lured many men into the Klan, particularly in
the North and Midwest. Communists had taken control of many locals of the ILGWU, the Furriers,
Amalgamated Clothing Workers, United Mine Workers and others, and struggles for control of the
unions continued into the Forties and Fifties.The conservative upcountry of South Carolina recalled
the times in 1914 when the IWW propagandist Joseph Ettor, who had led the strike in Lawrence,
Mass., came preaching the anarcho-syndicalist gospel in the mill villages. In his history ‘Mill and
Town in South Carolina 1880-1920″, Dr. David Carlton said:”The Wobblies moved into Greenville in
early 1914, and, by May, were claiming two thousand members. Although they figured in a minor
incident at one of the mills at the end of May, they attracted little attention until early July
when a wildcat strike at Lewis Parker’s Monaghan Mill escalated into a major confrontation. There
were rallies and parades, one of which featured the very novel sight of a red flag being carried
down Greenville’s Main Street the strike at Monaghan had been the result of an accumulation of
petty grievances and was rapidly defused by the willingness of Parker to consult with a workers’
committee.Carlton noted that the strike leaders generally showed far less knowledge of IWW
principles than did Parker himself, and that Parker had the bulk of the meeting’s proceedings
transcribed and published in the Greenville News of July 17, 1914.Labor Unrest In New EnglandIn
these present days of comparative labor peace, it is sometimes difficult to imagine the problems of
production faced by New England superintendents in the restless days of the Twenties, especially in
plants where immigrant workers had little or no command of English and scant understanding of
instructions. This difficulty of communication was a major factor in the move of some mills to the
South, according to a member of a prominent Fall River family who supervised the transfer of one
such mill to Tennessee.The 48-hour single shift was common in the New England mills while the
non-union South was moving to multiple shifts to keep the machinery operating.After a seven-month
strike in Lawrence, Pacific Mills commissioned Lockwood Greene to find a Southern site for a
finishing plant. The result: the huge plant at Lyman, S. C. built in 1923, now operated by M.
Lowenstein (Springs Industries} which acquired Lyman and Pacific’s mills in Columbia, S. C. in 1955
from Burlington which had bought control of Pacific Mills the year before.The Southern TrekOthers
joining Pacific in the Southern trek were American Thread Company to Dalton, Ga.; Stark Mills to
Hogansville, Ga.; Cascade Mills to Mooresville, N. C.; Worth Mills to Fort Worth, Tex.; and
Southern Worsted Company to Greenville.Those moves were typical. Between 1922 and 1932, 73 mills in
Fall River, Mass., were liquidated, 75% of the city’s textile industry. New Bedford lost 21,000
textile jobs in the same period. The Reporter followed the mills South, T opening a branch office
at 229 East Stone Ave. in Greenville in the mid-Twenties. The publication, now being run by E.
Howard Bennett, son of the founder, Frank P. Bennett, Jr., and C. Randolph Bennett, was enjoying a
more open format, progressing from the grey columns of type of the early days to wide use of photos
and sketches, to wider columns and larger type. The pages were filled with news and ads of
machinery improvements and new accessories.Editorials reflected a scorn for those content with the
old: “The Mule Spinners Union in Fall River voted to strike because of the 10% reduction in wages.
Mule spinners are an anachronism. They are about as important in Fail River as a coachman in a
garage.”Throughout New England, wages were being cut 10%. The mills were running slack, only two or
three days a week. Owners contended they could pay more if workers would be more productive, but
they were up against the traditional union attitude of stretching the work to make the job last
longer.Said the Reporter in 1925: “The interest of New England manufacturers in Southern locations,
and the investigation of the claims of advantages in Southern manufacturing conditions as to wages,
hours of operation, taxes, etc., increases rather than otherwise. Since the first of the 1925 year,
there have been more New England manufacturers scouting through the South than there were during
the whole 12 months of 1924. “The operatives in New England cotton mills themselves seem to be the
only persons who can put a stop to this transferring of machinery from the East to the South. IF
they will, of their own volition, double up the machinery tended per operative, the whole situation
will be reversed and no one in the country can beat the New England mills and operatives on such a
basis.” Driving ForcesAnother great concern for all types of mills was the control of costs. “The
industry needs more roughneck treasurers,” said the Reporter in commenting on the poor
profitability of a group of mills.The drive for mill efficiency brought men with stop watches and
clip boards to tile intense indignation of many Southern workers who felt robbed of respect and
dignity. In March and April of 1929, the indignation resulted in unorganized, spontaneous walkouts
in Greenville, Elizabethton, Tenn., Marion, N. C. and Gastonia, N. C. Once their anger was vented
and their complaints heard, most of the strikers stayed out only a short duration, except at
Gastonia, where the National Textile Workers Union led by Communists Fred Beal and George Pershing
took over the movement. Tempers rose. Nearly all of the townpeople and most workers knew little of
the union moven1ent and mentally linked it with an alien threat to society. The cliche equation of
the times was: labor unions plus strikes equal Communists plus atheism plus social equality with
the Negro. The Gastonia strikers had no community support. While trying to break up a strikers’
meeting. the Gastonia police chief was fatally shot. In another incident, a woman striker was
killed. Beal and other defendants were convicted of conspiracy to murder the police chief and
sentenced to 5 to 20 years. A legacy of bitterness was left to boil over in the 1934 textile
general strike, of which more later.The Twenties saw the end of the reign of one of the industrys
most notable personalities. William M. Wood of American Woolen Co.. and the start in business of
two others, J. Spencer Love, founder of the world’s largest textile concern Burlington Industries,
and Royal Little, whose Textron flashed like a giant comet across textile skies before Little moved
on to other ventures.William Madison Wood (1858-1926), grandson of an immigrant from the Azores who
had anglicized his name started at the bottom as a mill operative and rose through the ranks to the
heights. He was assistant manager of Washington Mills at Lawrence. Mass., owned by Frederick Ayer
of Boston, when he married Ayer’s daughter.In the 48-month depression of 1893-97, he persuaded his
father-in-law to buy bankrupt mills and consolidate them into the American Woolen Co.. a
conglomerate that became official in IS99. Wood served as treasurer until President Ayer died, but
he was the big shot; full page ads in The Reporter carried the name William M. Wood, Treasurer. in
large type under the company logo. When President Ayer and other officers were named, they were
listed in small type in the body of the ad. Egotist though he was, Wood was a full-blown trash
mover. In 1905, he built Wood Mill, 30 acres under one roof, employing nearly 10,000 workers.
Between them, the Washington and Wood mills alone added 16,000 jobs to the Lawrence economy in 10
years. But, Wood was notorious in New England as an exploiter of labor, which made him an unwitting
accomplice of the IWW in the 1912 strike described earlier.The January 8, 1925 issue of The
Reporter carried the bold headline: “President Wood Has Resigned.” There was no doubt in the
textile world who was meant. The Reporter commented that Wood had carried the whole load of the 60
mills of American Woolen on his shoulders, and that although a highly competent administrator would
succeed him, there was no comparable giant in sight.The article on the resignation passed on a bit
of financial gossip: “The late A. D. Juilliard was largely identified with American Woolen Co., and
he had become a great factor in the financial affairs of New York City. He undoubtedly helped Mr.
Wood a great deal. It will be remembered that 10 or 12 years ago, the American Woolen Company had
about $20 million of common stock outstanding, and that suddenly about $10 million of it was
redeemed and paid off. We have never known it to be fact, but we have always believed that this $10
million represented A. D. Juilliard’s cashing his ticket in the American Woolen Company. “The Royal
Little SagaThe fortunes of American Woolen and Royal Little’s Textron would mingle nearly 20 years
later. Little, a relative of that Arthur O. Little of research fame who did fabricate a silk purse
from a sow’s ear, was only 27 when, with $10,000, a partner and three employees, Launched Special
Yarns in 1923 in Providence, R. 1., working with the relatively new ”artificial silk” which took
the name “rayon” in 1924, following the idea of Kenneth Lord of Burlington Industries that the
luster of the fiber suggested the rays of the sun. Little formed Franklin Rayon, later Atlantic
Rayon, producing ladies undergarments of rayon.World War 11 brought him opportunities he quickly
seized. While busy with war contracts, he found time to buy old mill buildings in both North and
South and to install modern machinery to meet a demand that seemed insatiable.Little changed his
company’s name to Textron in 1944, and by 1952, had 15 mills, mostly in the South. In that year, he
worked out a merger with American Woolen, which had lost the git-up-and-go of William Wood’s day
and, although still New England’s largest textile firm, was down to 27 mills (12 of them not
operating) and was losing $1 million a month because’ said Fortune Magazine, the company was “a
major producer of staples in an age of style.” Two years later, in 1955, Little had created Textron
Amerotron through a merger of Textron, American Woolen and Robbins Mills, with a subsidiary,
Amerotron, operating the textile mills of his budding conglomerate. Within two years, Amerotron had
liquidated the New England mills, had consolidated the best of the machinery into the Southern
plants, and had built an up-to-date woolen mill at Barnwell, S. C.Not long afterward, Little began
acquiring non-textile businesses and, in 1963, sold seven textile mills to Deering, Milliken whose
president, Roger Milliken, knew that style, not staple, was the best seller and who was staging the
Milliken Breakfast Show for buyers at New York market time. Royal Little moved on as master of
conglomerates and as author of How To Lose $100,000,000 and Other Valuable Information’.Enter
Burlington’s LoveJ. Spencer Love started his textile career in modest fashion but built bigger and
better than others. In 1923, with the help of local businessmen, he formed Burlington Mills in
Burlington, N. C.. a small cotton mill employing 200 with himself as plant manager. He experimented
with rayon, first as a decorative yarn, then as dress goods, later as drapery and upholstery
fabric, then rayon crepes, taffetas and sheers.Burlington expanded steadily, even in the Depression
years, and achieved $1 billion in sales in 1962, the year of his death, the first textile firm to
do so. He and his associates recognized in the twenties the possibilities of the first synthetics.
More of Burlington as our textile story continues.Signs of big trouble ahead had been mounting
since the mid-Twenties. Overseas. Benito Mussolini’s Black Shirts seized power in Italy and Il Duce
became the symbolic dictator, pounding his chest and talking conquest. In Russia, Stalin maneuvered
his way to total political control and began the terror that would eliminate millions. In Germany,
a wartime corporal Adolph Hitler, was harassing the weak leaders of the Weimar Republic.In the
United States, markets for many industries had been turning slack for several years, and the
textile mills were flirting with recession while millions speculated in stocks about which they
knew little, speculation whose volume mounted steadily until 1929 when the market crashed on
October 24, and again on October 29.The Great Depression had begun.Burlington IndustriesJ. Spencer
Love was 22 in 1919, a Harvard graduate just back from World War I service, looking fruitlessly for
a job in the Boston area, when he decided to head for Gastonia, N. C. where his uncle ran Gastonia
Cotton Manufacturing Co., founded by his grandfather in 1870. He got a job as assistant to the mill
manager. Within seven months, he purchased controlling interest for $250,000, using $3,000 in
personal savings, the rest in notes and loans co-signed by his father, a professor of mathematics
at Harvard.The mill was in trouble in the post-war depression, but Love coped by selling the real
estate, storing the machinery and looking for a new location. He found it in Burlington, N. C.
where the Chamber of Commerce helped sell stock to build a new plant.Burlington Mills, which was to
grow into the nation’s largest textile firm, was chartered November 6, 1923.Production in the new
plant started before the building was completed: half the weave room floor was mostly dirt. First
products turned out by the 200 employees were flag cloth, bunting, cotton scrims, curtain and dress
fabrics and diaper cloth. Many of these products were out of style within a year, and new products
were tried, but not successfully.Love decided to try rayon, then in its experimental stage. He
began making rayon bedspreads which sold well. The firm was soon a national leader in weaving
rayon. A second plant was built in 1926, and the firm opened its New York sales office in
1929.Expansion continued in the Depression years of the Thirties as Burlington took over closed
mills. By the end of 1936, Burlington had 22 plants in nine communities and had moved headquarters
to Greensboro, N. C. In 1937, the company was reorganized to consolidate its various associated
companies and its stock was listed on the New York Stock Exchange.The war years brought
concentration on military production, including development of parachute cloth made with the new
nylon fiber. In 1944, Burlington opened its first overseas plant.After the war, the company renewed
its diversification efforts and its construction of new plants, easy to spot because they were
built with one wall of wood which could be torn out on short order to allow expansion. The firm was
diversifying into new product areas, a move reflected by the name change to Burlington
Industries.Love died in 1962, the year Burlington became the first textile firm to pass the $1
billion mark in sales. Charles F. Myers, Jr. and Henry Rauch assumed the leadership, the first in a
line of distinguished executies succeeding the founder.Burlington has responded swiftly and
positively to the changes resulting from the volatility of the textile markets in recent years. The
Domestics division was sold to J. P. Stevens and Co., Inc., and Burlington bought C. H.
MaslandandSons, a major supplier of molded floor carpets, truck liners and interior trim parts for
automobile and truck manufacturers. The company created a specialized military fabrics organization
and is developing new proprietary products for protective clothing and equipment. It is a leading
producer of glass, rayon, aramid, and carbon fabrics for composites materials in which fabrics are
treated with resins and other substances to obtain high strength-to-weight ratios, used especially
by the aerospace industry.Today, Burlington operates 83 plants world-wide71 in 10 states, 12 in
four other countries. Its 43,000 employees turn out this range of products:

  • for apparel markets: yarn, greige fabrics; knitted fabrics of polyester and polyester blends;
    woven fabrics of worsted, worsted blends, cotton, cotton blends, nylon, polyester, polyester
    blends; denim, corduroy; printed fabrics; fabrics for home sewing.
  • for residential and commercial furnishings markets: carpets; rugs; draperies and shades;
    bedspread ensembles; mattress ticking, upholstery; restaurant table cloths and napkins.
  • for industrial markets: woven and non-woven fabrics and carpeting for the automotive,
    electronics, communications, construction, utilities, aerospace, defense and other industries.

Annual sales in 1986 were $2.8 billion, with net earnings of $56.5 million.

Sponsors