Bonar And Natpet Select NSC Nonwoven Equipment

Bonar Technical Fabrics NV— a Belgium-based producer of woven and nonwoven fabrics for geotextile
and agrotextile applications, and a part of United Kingdom-based performance materials manufacturer
Low & Bonar Plc — and National Petrochemical Industrial Co. (Natpet) — a producer of
polypropylene (PP) resin, and a subsidiary of Saudi Arabia-based investment company Alujain Corp. —
have purchased a nonwoven production line from France-based NSC nonwoven for their joint venture
(JV) company in Saudi Arabia. The state-of-the-art line has a 6-meter working width and includes
the Asselin-Thibeau IsoProDyn® control system and the A.C.S. system for high-speed crosslapping,
among other carding and needling equipment. NSC nonwoven reports the line is the fourth Bonar has
purchased that is equipped with the Asselin-Thibeau ProDyn® system.

Bonar and Natpet’s JV will produce geotextile products for the fast-growing civil engineering
markets in the Middle East and the Indian subcontinent. The companies have built a new
manufacturing plant at a site located near Natpet’s PP production facility in western Saudi Arabia.
The NSC nonwoven line will be installed at the plant in early 2012 and production is expected to
commence in mid-2012.

June 21, 2011

FDA Publishes Draft Nanotechnology Guidelines, Invites Feedback

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has published “Draft Guidance for Industry, Considering
Whether an FDA-Regulated Product Involves the Application of Nanotechnology,” and is asking for
feedback from the industrial and public sectors. The draft guidelines present a list of criteria —
including the size and properties of nanomaterials used — to help determine whether nanotechnology
is used in a FDA-regulated product.

The draft guidance is an outgrowth of recommendations made in 2007 by the FDA’s
Nanotechnology Task Force, formed in 2006 to identify potential effects of nanomaterials used in
FDA-regulated products and look into ways to evaluate those effects. The National Nanotechnology
Initiative — a federal research and development program that coordinates the nanotechnology-related
activities of a number of federal agencies — defines nanotechnology as “the understanding and
control of matter at dimensions of roughly 1 to 100 nanometers, where unique phenomena enable novel
applications.” 

“Our goal is to regulate these products using the best possible science,” said FDA
Commissioner Dr. Margaret A. Hamburg. “Understanding nanotechnology remains a top priority within
the agency’s regulatory science initiative and, in doing so, we will be prepared to usher science,
public health, and FDA into a new, more innovative era.”

“Nanotechnology is an emerging technology that has the potential to be used in a broad array
of FDA-regulated medical products, foods, and cosmetics,” said Dr. Carlos Peña, FDA’s director of
emerging technology programs. “But because materials in the nanoscale dimension may have different
chemical, physical, or biological properties from their larger counterparts, FDA is monitoring the
technology to assure such use is beneficial.”

Although FDA has not yet identified particular safety issues related to nanotechnology
applications in FDA-regulated products, it is keeping watch because certain nanomaterials are of
potential concern.

FDA-regulated products that might involve the application of nanomaterials on or in textile
materials include tissue engineering scaffolds and certain other implantable medical devices, and
antimicrobial materials, among other products.

The draft guideance and other related resources are available at
www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/SpeciallTopics/Nanotechnology/ucm257926.htm.

June 21, 2011

Saint-Gobain Technical Fabrics Renamed Saint-Gobain ADFORS

Saint-Gobain Technial Fabrics — a manufacturer of industrial and construction reinforcement fabrics
using technologies including laid scrim, weaving, knitting, mat forming, lamination and coating;
and a division of the France-based Saint-Gobain Group — has renamed the company Saint-Gobain
ADFORS. The name is derived from two roots, with “ad” coming from the word “add”; and “fors”
derived from “force” or “reinforcement.”

“We look forward to building brand equity with the new name by offering best in class
service and excellent product innovation,” said Rudi Coetzee, general manager, Saint-Gobain ADFORS
America Inc., Grand Island, N.Y. “The new ADFORS name provides us the opportunity to really build a
strong brand backed by the globally recognized Saint-Gobain.”

June 21, 2011

June 2011

Marietta, Ga.-based
YKK Corp. of America‘s Board of Directors has elected the company’s President and
CEO
Alex Gregory to chairman of the Board.

AlexGregory

Gregory

The
American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists (AATCC), Research Triangle
Park, N.C., has presented the 2010 J. William Weaver Paper of the Year Award to
Dr. Rachel McQueen,
Dr. Monika Maria Keelan and
Swapna Kannayiram, University of Alberta, Canada, for their paper titled
“Determination of Antimicrobial Efficacy for Textile Products Against Odor-Causing Bacteria.” AATCC
also has given the Technical Committee on Research (TCR) Service Award to
Roland Connelly for his work on AATCC UV Calibration Program and Evaluation
Procedure 11; and
Norma Keyes in recognition of her work on the Liquid Moisture Management Test
Method and the Moisture Management Technical Supplement; and the AATCC Young Entrepreneur Award to
Bryan Swarn, co-founder of Phenetix Urban Athletic Wear Co.

London-based
WGSN has named
Catriona Macnab chief creative officer; and has promoted
Sandra Halliday to editor-in-chief; and
Maria Janssen to creative director, Denimhead.com.

San Francisco-based
Levi Strauss & Co. has named
Walker MacWilliam vice president of men’s design, Levi’s® brand.

The
Carpet America Recovery Effort (CARE), Dalton, Ga., has named
Thomas Holland, Texas Carpet Recycling and Corporate Floors, and
Sheri Gorman, RD Weiss Cos., to its Board of Directors, and has re-elected
Ron Greitzer, Los Angeles Fiber and Reliance Carpet Cushion, and
Sean Ragiel, CarpetCycle, to the Board. The organization also has named
Eric Nelson, Interface Americas, CARE Person of the Year.


Carmel, Ind.-based
Top Value Fabrics has named
Dave Sailer business development manager.

DaveSailer

Sailer

Chattanooga, Tenn.-based
Propex Operating Co. LLC‘s Board of Managers has named
Michael Gorey president and CEO.

New York City-based
Capital Business Credit LLC has appointed
Robert Grbic COO,
Michael Fortino CFO, and
Charles Sharf executive vice president and New York factoring portfolio manager.

Bunting Magnetics Co., Newton, Kan., has named
Matt Anderson manufacturing engineer and
Kenton Stumps design engineer for the Material Handling product line; and
Simon Ayling production manager and
Steve Lacy technical sales executive for Bunting’s European manufacturing and
sales operation.

The
International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC), Washington, has named
Dr. Sukumar Saha, U.S. Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service,
Genetics and Precision Agriculture Unit, Mississippi State University, the 2011 ICAC Cotton
Researcher of the Year.

The
National Textile Association, Washington, has awarded the Bronze Student’s Medal
to
John P. Lord, University of Massachusetts – Dartmouth.

Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), Arlington, Va., has elected
Stuart A. Webster vice president, training and education.

Lubbock, Texas-based
Textile Exchange has named
LaRhea Pepper global managing director.

Midland, Mich.-based
Dow Corning Corp. has elected
Mike Conway,
Linda Kennan,
Joseph Rinaldi and
Doug Schoettinger corporate vice presidents.

Louise Tiler, Leeds College of Art, United Kingdom, has been awarded the Grand
Prize in the SURTEX 2011
designext student design competition.

Loves Park, Ill.-based
Zenith Cutter Co. has named
Steve Kao sales director.

Delano, Minn.-based
Easiway Systems Inc. has named
Kevin Lewis general manager.

KevinLewis

Lewis

Winston-Salem, N.C.-based
Hanesbrands Inc. has named
Dale W. Boyles interim CFO, effective June 30.

The Atlanta-based
Georgia Association of Manufacturers (GAM) and
Manufacturers Education Foundation (MEF) have elected
Rick Sargent, Peach State Labs, chairman;
Monte Galbraith, Denim North America, vice chairman; and
Miles Wright, Mannington Commercial, treasurer. GAM and MEF also have elected
Burl Finkelstein, Kason Industries Inc., to serve a one-year term on both Boards
of Directors.
Lee Bryan, TenCate Geosynthetics;
Tom Deems, New Riverside Ochre; and
Trey Hodges, Swift Spinning LLC, will serve two-year terms on both Boards of
Directors.
David Morgan, Shaw Industries Group Inc.;
Jim Jones, Dixie Industrial Finishing;
Mike Anderson, TenCate Protective Fabrics;
George Boyd Jr., Goldens’ Foundry & Machine Co.;
Mike Kiepura, RockTenn; and
Brian Johnstone, Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co., will serve three-year terms on
both Boards of Directors.

Aurora, Ill.-based
Aurora Specialty Textiles Group Inc. has named
Teresa Skinner marketing coordinator.

Clover, S.C.-based
Synthetic Yarn and Fiber Association (SYFA) has elected the following officers of
its 2011 Board of Directors:
Keith Adams, ITG/Burlington Worldwide, president;
Ernie Hundley, Nilit America Inc., first vice president; and
Mike Becker, Michael S. Becker Inc., second vice president. The association also
has elected the following directors:
Mac Beard, Strategic Textile Solutions;
Machell Apple, Valdese Weavers;
Roger Crossfield, Goulston Technologies Inc. (retired); and
Joel Cornelius, Unifi Inc. SYFA also has named
John Amirtharaj, Premiere Fibers, membership chairman;
Alasdair Carmichael, PCI Fibres, chairman of publicity; and
Jerry Eskew, Oerlikon Textile Parts, conference chairman.

Atlanta-based
InterfaceFLOR has named
Charley Knight vice president and
Brian Wilson director of design, Interface Hospitality.

Merrillville, Ind.-based
MonoSol LLC has named
Hanna Necel sales and technical support agent for Poland, Russia, Belarus, Latvia,
Lithuania, Estonia, Slovakia and Ukraine.

Spartanburg-based
Milliken & Company has named
Cresta Bledsoe global creative director, floor covering division.

CrestaBledsoe

Bledsoe

Cary, N.C.-based
Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry (INDA) has named
Philip Pitt marketing director.

Street, Md.-based
H.P White Laboratory Inc. has appointed
John Cronin manager, global business development.

Switzerland-based
bluesign technologies AG has named
Dr. Yi Heng Cheng,
Jill Dumain,
Dr. Boqiang Lin and
Dr. E.U. von Weizsäcker to its Advisory Board.

New Haven, Mo.-based
MarChem CFI Inc. has appointed
Cameron Weldon upper Midwest regional sales representative.

CameronWeldon

Weldon

Edinburg, Texas-based
FibeRio Technology Corp. has named
Dr. Ron Larson to its Technical Advisory Board.

Business Falls Off At End Of Second Quarter


A
s the first half of the year draws to a close, yarn spinners find themselves in the
recently uncommon position of facing uncertainties and asking questions about deteriorating
business conditions.

For the past 18 months, the industry has seen a steady stream of business, often operating
at full capacity — especially in ring-spun yarns — and with a healthy backlog of orders. Then,
beginning about eight weeks ago, some spinners noticed the beginnings of a slowdown. And within the
past four to six weeks, orders have been off substantially.

“Right now, I’m not really sure what’s going on,” said one Southeastern spinner. “Orders are
definitely off a bit. Certainly, I would not classify business as bad, but it is not as brisk as it
has been. We’ve been on a roll for a long time, and this is the first indication we have seen that
it might be coming to an end.”

Multiple spinners speculate that the recent slowdown might be attributable to several
factors. “We saw from recent reports that economic growth in the past month or so has slowed
somewhat,” said one spinner. “Because of manufacturing and business cycles, many of the
dramatically higher prices we’ve seen over the past six months only recently hit at retail. We’re
thinking that at least some of the recent slowdown is a result of consumer sticker shock.”

Said another spinner: “Right now, I would say that business is off for multiple reasons.
Price, I believe, is a factor, both for our customers and consumers at retail. But also, we believe
that the supply pipeline is currently full. During the economic crisis, many retailers let their
stocks dwindle to almost nothing. And when they did place orders to restock, they only bought just
enough to replace what they had sold. What’s happening now is that the pipeline is full and
retailers have sufficient inventory — or even excess inventory — and have slowed down their
buying.”

Even further, some spinners speculate that a period of panic buying has come to an end. “We
had a period there for awhile when capacity was so tight that many customers were afraid that if
they did not place orders, they would be unable to get a position with a yarn manufacturer. So, to
hedge against not having product, they placed orders for more than they needed. As capacity has
become more available, they have reverted back to their normal practice of only buying enough
product to fill their orders.”


Third Quarter Uncertain


With the recent decrease in the volume and frequency of orders, yarn spinners are uncertain
of what the last half of the year will bring. “Right now, it’s anybody’s guess,” said one spinner.
“Is what we’ve seen over the past few weeks just a glitch, or is it an indicator of what we will
see through the end of the year?”

Another spinner said, “We still remain cautiously optimistic that business will be steady,
if not spectacular, over the remaining portion of the year. Right now, we think that as inventories
at various points in the supply chain began to shrink once again, we will see more robust
conditions.”


Price Pressures Remain


Yarn spinners remain under increasing pressure to reduce prices, especially in light of the
recent and rapid drop in cotton prices. “Price is always an issue, and it has become increasingly
so in the past few weeks,” said one spinner. “Customers see that raw material prices are dropping
and want an immediate and corresponding drop in yarn prices. But it doesn’t work that way. Spinners
are still making yarn from cotton they bought when prices were much, much higher.”

If there is any good news coming out of recent developments, it is that many spinners now
have ample capacity to accept new orders and turn them around in a relatively timely manner. “A few
months ago, we were struggling to deliver product as quickly as we had been able to do so
previously,” said one spinner. “We are certainly in a position now to accept orders and turn them.”

June 21, 2011

Fair Trade USA And Textile Exchange Form Strategic Partnership

OAKLAND, Calif. and LUBBOCK, Texas — June, 13 2011 — Fair Trade USA, the leading third-party
certifier of Fair Trade products in the United States, and Textile Exchange, a leader in
facilitating the expansion of the global organic cotton and sustainable fiber supply chain, have
formed a strategic partnership to offer brands new opportunities in responsible sourcing and to
better support cotton farming communities around the world.  This new partnership will focus
on market-linkage, joint conferences and tradeshows, and educational materials development to
recognize Fair Trade as the gold standard for sustainability in the textile industry. It also
reflects the trend that more and more brands are opting to use dual certified — organic and Fair
Trade — cotton in their retail lines.

Innovative companies like prAna, Maggie’s Organics and Greenlight Apparel have found there
are ways to go above and beyond the commitment to organic cotton. With Fair Trade consumers can
rest assured that their garment was produced under both socially and environmentally sustainable
conditions. Leading organic cotton buyers are also evolving from traditional corporate social
responsibility efforts to supply chain transparency and integrated sustainability initiatives,
taking their responsibility commitments to a whole new level. The move to organics was a huge step
for many mainstream brands, but as consumers continue to demand more ethical sourcing practices,
companies are beginning to look for new, more transparent and verifiable ways to make a difference.
This partnership between Textile Exchange and Fair Trade USA offers brands a solution to this
challenge.

“More than half (62%) of all Fair Trade products are also certified organic,” said Heather
Franzese, Senior Manager, Fair Trade USA. “Cotton is no exception.  Increasing consumer demand
for sustainably produced clothing is truly driving this shift in industry values; people want to
know that their purchase was made at no cost to the environment or the people who worked hard to
produce it. This partnership helps make that a reality.”

Additionally, Fair Trade cotton sourcing offers brands access to long-term, sustainable
supply chains. Today cotton prices are at a 15-year high, leaving brands scrambling to secure
stable supply of their raw materials at reasonable prices. Fair Trade and organic are a vehicle for
companies to form direct, long-term relationships with suppliers and farmers, helping them to
secure supply at the right quality and price, and reducing risks associated with price volatility.

“The intention of sustainability has always been about evolving and doing better; taking the
principle of organic sourcing and including Fair Trade standards not only secures market access, it
also guarantees higher prices for farmers to invest back into product quality,” said Nicole
Bassett, prAna’s Director of Sustainability. “It is exciting to see this new partnership between
Textile Exchange and Fair Trade USA emerge as it leverages knowledge and best practices that will
undoubtedly create a ripple effect of responsible sourcing in the textile industry.”

“This partnership with Fair Trade USA brings together the respective strengths of both
organizations to help provide a framework to support long-term relationships and benefits for
farmers, brands and consumers,” said LaRhea Pepper, Managing Director of Textile Exchange. “It
truly is a win for all.”

Posted on June 21, 2011

Source: Fair Trade USA

Techtextil North America Symposium 2012 Call For Papers

ATLANTA — June 15, 2011 — The ninth edition of the highly acclaimed Techtextil North America
Symposium will be held April 24-26, 2012 at the Georgia World Congress Center in Atlanta, GA.

We are pleased to announce that in 2012, ATME-I (American Textile Machinery
Exhibition-International) will be incorporated into Techtextil North America.  Also in 2012,
Texprocess Americas (formerly SPESA Expo) will co-locate with Techtextil North America in adjacent
halls providing tremendous value for textile and sewn products industry professionals at all levels
of the textile and sewn products manufacturing and application supply chains. The co-location means
that attendees will be able to move freely between the individual shows and benefit from the
industry-leading educational and networking seminars and special events all in the same venue.

This co-location will offer speakers a potentially new audience and exposure to new
industries. As always, the timing of the 2012 edition will be such that participants will have
ample time to walk the exhibition floor. Multi-track sessions will feature technical and
application specific presentations relevant to the industry. Previous Techtextil North America
Symposiums have received high praise and acclaim proving once again that Techtextil North America
is THE “must attend”, most comprehensive event for the technical textile industry.

Papers are especially solicited in the following areas, with emphasis on work that will
impact the industry in the short term as well as in the future:

1) Extreme fibers, fabrics, materials and technology for special applications

2) Composites — involving high performance fibers/fabrics

3) New materials and new standards for safety and protection

4) Automotive, aerospace, transportation applications

5) Smart/intelligent coatings, nonwovens, and other materials

6) Technical nonwovens

7) Innovative materials — what, when, and how technical textiles will impact the industry

8) Medical — special applications

9) Green technology involving technical textiles

10) Packaging with technical textiles

Consideration will be given preference to those papers relating to:

1) New development and technology in all fiber/fabric forms

2) Innovations in materials, processes, or manufacturing techniques

3) Developing products and applications for technical textiles

4) Technical textiles research that may impact the industry

5) Markets (existing or emerging), industry issues (trade and others), trends, etc.

6) Relevance to practical applications and short to medium term adoption

Selection of the papers to be presented will be based on abstracts of 300-500 words. Authors
should emphasize new and significant findings/developments.

Abstracts must be received by August 5, 2011.

Though electronic submission (email) is preferred, the abstract may also be sent by fax or
mail.

Lorie Gross

Marketing Manager  

Techtextil North America        

1600 Parkwood Circle

Suite 615

Atlanta, Georgia 30339  

Phone:  
678-732-2433                                       
Fax:    
  770-984-8023                        
Email:    
lorie.gross@usa.messefrankfurt.com                                 
URL:     
www.techtextilNA.com

The abstract must include the name, company or other affiliation, telephone number, fax
number, e-mail address and mailing address of the speaker and/or the person to whom correspondence
about the abstract should be directed. Only one speaker per presentation will be allowed, though
co-authors may be listed. The speaker for the paper should be underlined and (the speaker only)
will receive a complimentary symposium registration. Authors will be notified of acceptance of
their abstracts by September 30, 2011.

Authors of accepted papers will be required to provide a full paper and/or presentation by
April 1, 2012. The papers/presentations will be published in the Conference Proceedings on a USB
Stick provided to all registrants. While full papers are preferred, extensive outlines and
PowerPoint presentations will be considered for inclusion on the USB Stick (in pdf only). Authors
are responsible for securing any necessary copyright or other clearance for all abstracts, papers
and other materials submitted.

All presentations should be planned to run approximately 20 minutes plus 10 minutes for
questions.

For questions, please contact Lorie Gross at 678-732-2433 or
lorie.gross@usa.messefrankfurt.com.

Posted on June 20, 2011

Source: Messe Frankfurt Inc.

Antimicrobial Claims: Mold And Mildew Prevention Subject To Pesticide Regulation


L
et’s say you have a great product that not only serves as a wonderful shower curtain, but
also is impregnated with a chemical ingredient that seems to eliminate mold and mildew on the
curtain … or you develop a sheet that can be placed in a package and will keep any of the items
in that package from getting mold and mildew. These are some pretty nifty products, so you begin
thinking of how best to market your goods so that you can make a fortune.

Before your first infomercial airs, you had better wait a minute! Your product may be
subject to federal environmental laws – and state laws – that regulate pesticide products. While
you may believe the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) does not apply to
your product, here are some examples that may change your mind. Last year, the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) settled with Crocs Inc., Niwot, Colo., for $230,000 in penalties and an
agreement that Crocs would remove certain claims from its website, advertising and packaging for
its popular Crocs™ clogs. The EPA asserted that Crocs violated FIFRA by making unsubstantiated
antimicrobial health claims that its products killed or controlled growth of bacteria. Also last
year, the parent company of San Leandro, Calif.-based The North Face®, along with three other
companies, paid more than $500,000 in penalties to the EPA for antimicrobial claims made in
violation of FIFRA. The public health claims involved products including shoes, headphones and
bathroom fixtures; and advertised that the products prevented the spread of bacteria, mold and
mildew. In The North Face matter, the company was fined in connection with its marketing on more
than 60 products for allegedly making claims that the products inhibited the growth of
disease-causing bacteria. Normally, people would not consider a rubber clog or headphones as a
pesticide product; however, the item may become subject to FIFRA regulation if the company makes
certain antimicrobial claims.


Pesticide Regulation


Under FIFRA’s broad scope, mold and mildew are considered pests and are regulated as
such.  The EPA’s definition of “pest” includes “any fungus, bacterium, virus, or other
microorganism, except for those on or in living man or other living animals and those on or in
processed food or processed animal feed, beverages, drugs.” A product that is meant to prevent,
destroy, repel or mitigate pests is considered a pesticide, and FIFRA makes it unlawful for any
person to distribute or sell any unregistered pesticide. Products that fall within FIFRA need to be
registered with the EPA and also must be registered in each state in which the product is
distributed. Since it is clear that unwanted mold and mildew fall within the meaning of “pest”
under FIFRA, what should you be aware of to avoid incurring penalties and a federal enforcement
action?

In most cases, a product would be regarded as a pesticide if it is intended to mitigate a
pest. A pesticide product is defined by the EPA as a pesticide in the particular form — including
composition, packaging and labeling — in which the pesticide is, or is intended to be, distributed
or sold. The term includes any physical apparatus used to deliver or apply the pesticide if
distributed or sold with the pesticide. Typically, substantial work is required to obtain a
registration for a pesticide product, including product chemistry, acute toxicity, and efficacy
data generation. If a company intends to advertise public health claims about the prevention of
disease-causing bacteria — such as “prevents bacterial and fungal growth” — the efficacy data must
also demonstrate a sufficient kill rate in order for the EPA to approve the claims. In fact, even
the labeling must be approved by the EPA. 


Treated Articles Exemption


Referring to the antimicrobial shower curtain earlier in this article, it would be difficult
to obtain a registration for such a shower curtain with public health claims, because of the
difficulty in proving efficacy. Therefore, most distributors of such products have taken the path
of marketing these products under the EPA’s treated articles exemption.  

The treated articles exemption is a creative method employed by the EPA to allow for the
distribution of products that may be useful, such as antimicrobial shower curtains, but also would
be hard to register because of the difficulty of demonstrating adequate efficacy. However, in order
to take advantage of the treated articles exemption, the antimicrobial product used within the
treated article must be registered for that use. By exempting these products, the agency has
allowed the use of minimal pesticide-related claims, such as “antimicrobial” and “kills
odor-causing bacteria,” on products that are not registered. Registration of pesticides for use in
treated articles is generally easier than registering new pesticidal products. 

If there are claims that the product has an antimicrobial effect that goes beyond the
exemption, then a full EPA registration as a pesticide is needed to comply with FIFRA. This
distinction means that so long as the antimicrobial claim is only about the product itself, the
treated articles exemption applies, as for the mold-resistant shower curtain. However, the
exemption would not apply and a full FIFRA registration would be needed if you wanted to claim that
the shower curtain prevented mold and mildew in the shower/tub area.


Claims, Labels And Language Choice


In an effort to assist the regulated community with compliance, the EPA has published a fact
sheet enumerating specific limitations applicable to the treated articles exemption. For example,
the fact sheet provides that claims for treated articles or substances are limited to the following
statement: “This product contains a preservative (for example, fungicide or insecticide) built-in
or applied as a coating only to protect the product.” An example of an acceptable label statement
would be:

  • Antimicrobial properties are built-in to inhibit the growth of bacteria that may affect this
    product. The antimicrobial properties do not protect users or others against bacteria, viruses,
    germs, or other disease organisms. Always clean and wash this product thoroughly before and after
    each use.

In addition, it should be noted that the treated articles exemption is available only for
the protection of the product and not for public health uses. The preservative claim and qualifying
statement on the product packaging must be given no greater prominence with regard to type, size or
color than other described product features.

The EPA’s description of what constitutes non-public health claims that may be acceptable
for treated articles is provided in the Pesticide Regulation Notice published by the EPA. Any of
the following must apply:

  1. A claim to inhibit the growth of mildew on the surface of a dried paint film or paint
    coating.
  2. A claim to inhibit microorganisms that may cause spoilage or fouling of the treated article or
    substance.
  3. A claim to inhibit offensive odors in the treated article or substance.
  4. EPA considers terms such as “antimicrobial,” “fungistatic,” “mildew-resistant,” and
    “preservative,” as being acceptable for exempted treated articles or substances provided that they
    are properly, and very clearly, qualified as to their intended non-public health use.

The EPA’s examples for acceptable mold- and mildew-resistant claims include, among others:

  • This article has been treated with a fungistatic agent to protect the product from fungal
    growth.
  • Mildew Resistant – Extends useful life of article by controlling deterioration caused by
    mildew.
  • Article treated to resist deterioration by mold fungus.
  • Article treated to resist deterioration from mildew.
  • The fungistatic agent in this article makes it especially useful for resisting deterioration
    caused by mildew.
  • Gives mildew-resistant coating.

The EPA’s examples for acceptable odor-resistant claims include:

  • This product contains an antimicrobial agent to control odors.
  • This product contains an antimicrobial agent to prevent microorganisms from degrading the
    product.
  • Resists Odors – This product has been treated to resist bacterial odors.
  • Inhibits the growth of bacterial odors.
  • Resists microbial odor development.
  • Retards the growth and action of bacterial odors.
  • Guards against the growth of odors from microbial causes.
  • Guards against degradation from microorganisms.
  • Reduces odors from microorganisms.
  • Odor-resistant.
  • Acts to mitigate the development of odors.

Notwithstanding that the EPA offers the above examples as acceptable, statements regarding
public health claims for specific products should be reviewed by legal counsel to ensure that they
comply with the EPA guidelines. Further, the EPA also indicates that any specific attempt to try to
imply more than these sorts of effects by putting additional claims in the name of the product or
increasing the size of the claims relevant to other product descriptions is unacceptable. 

Companies should be aware that FIFRA does not allow them to make public health pesticide
claims for any product unless the product falls within an exemption or has been registered by the
EPA. The EPA promises to continue to take action against companies that make certain antimicrobial
claims, as it did in the Crocs and The North Face enforcement matters. Therefore, manufacturing and
distributing companies should appreciate the marketing nuances relating to FIFRA compliance when
making antimicrobial claims involving mold and mildew. Costs to take steps to ensure compliance
with FIFRA pale in comparison to the costs of potential penalties and adverse business publicity
arising from EPA enforcement actions. 

The devil is in the details when it is comes to mold and mildew prevention claims in your
product marketing and labeling. Because FIFRA is a claims-based regulatory scheme, the way you
phrase your claims may ultimately determine your company’s compliance status with FIFRA.


Editor’s note: Tricia Foley is a partner at Day Pitney LLP in New York City. Her practice
involves the business and regulatory aspects of environmental law, and she is a frequent author and
speaker on environmental topics.

Cindy J. Karlson is counsel in Day Pitney’s Hartford, Conn., office. Her practice is in
environmental and land use law; and involves counseling clients on permitting, compliance,
enforcement and transactional matters.

Robert Brennis, a former product manager for antimicrobial products at the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, is owner of Brennis Consulting Services LLC in Alexandria,
Va.


June 21, 2011

Naturally Advanced Technologies, Ashland Announce CRAiLEX® Development

Vancouver, Canada-based Naturally Advanced Technologies Inc. (NAT) — a developer of biomass
resources from flax, hemp and other bast fibers — and Covington, Ky.-based Ashland Inc. — a
specialty chemicals manufacturer and solutions provider serving water treatment, paper products,
personal care and household, construction, architectural coatings, energy, pharmaceutical and other
markets — have entered into a two-year agreement to jointly develop CRAiLEX® high-grade dissolving
pulp for commercial applications.

NAT collaborated with Canada-based Alberta Innovates — Technologies Futures to develop an
environmentally friendly pulping process to make Crailex dissolving pulp from bast fibers cut to a
uniform 10-millimeter length. The patented process does not require the use of harsh chemicals or
costly equipment traditionally used to make kraft pulp. According to the company, Crailex exhibits
superior properties compared with traditional high-quality dissolving pulps, and can be extruded
into yarn for performance apparel or used as a base to make biodegradable plastics, and paper
towels and other consumer products. Ashland will use Crailex pulp derived from both flax and hemp
to develop a line of cellulosic products for a range of applications.

“This is the start of our Crailex technology roll out,” said NAT CEO Ken Barker. “In the same
manner and strategy we employed to bring our CRAiLAR® technology to commercialization, partnering
with an industry leader such as Ashland Inc. is a key milestone in the development of Crailex. We
are extremely proud of the opportunity and partnership potential in working with Ashland.”

NAT’s Crailar technology is used to process bast fiber as a staple fiber for textile and
apparel uses. The company is currently ramping up its cultivation and processing of fiber flax and
has partnered with a number of companies to develop various textile and apparel products and bring
them to market
(See ”
Quality
Fabric Of The Month: Flax Unshackled
,”
Textile World, May/June 2011).

June 14, 2011

The Rupp Report: Textiles For Humankind

It is no secret that many textile-producing companies, mainly in Western countries with higher
production and labor costs than in the developing countries, are trying to escape from the “Fashion
Trap,” as the Rupp Report likes to call it. It also is no secret that for at least the last two
decades, Asian countries, particularly China and other countries in the Pacific Rim, have overtaken
the Western Hemisphere to produce the major commodity portion of fabrics and apparel.

Industrial Fabrics

At an early stage, some Western companies started a new business sector: specialty textile
products — to put it bluntly — to “make some money again.” The key to this money making was and
still is industrial fabrics, also called technical textiles. Since then, many companies, including
the textile machinery manufacturers, have diversified their product portfolios and become an
important player in this promising market.

But, which is the way to go in this sector? First of all, it takes a lot of action to
establish a serious and profitable production line; and secondly, it also takes a lot of time to
build up a reputation and become an important source for industrial fabrics and products. And, of
top of that, there are endless possibilities, meaning sectors to enter: construction, civil
engineering, agrotextiles, geotextiles, and so on.

Humankind

As evidenced frequently in reports in

Textile World
and its sister magazines

Textiles Panamericanos
and

Textile World Asia
, the sectors of protective garments, including medical textiles, could be very promising
markets to ensure the future of experienced and specialized textile enterprises. One might even
call them “textiles for humankind.” The simple reason for this expression is the fact that there is
nothing more important in this world than each and every human being. And the global population is
still rising, mainly in the emerging countries. And all these people must be served and protected
from whatever problem there is for the human body, above and below the soil, with the right textile
product. The following estimate and projection about the world’s population now is becoming further
ammunition to support this observation:

Rising Population

In the recently published “2010 Revision of World Population Prospects,” the Population
Division of the United Nations (UN) Department of Economic and Social Affairs estimates that the
global population will reach 9.3 billion in 2050 and 10.1 billion in 2100. In a previous report
published in 2008, the UN estimated the global population would reach up to 9.15 billion people in
2050.

It is predicted that a substantial part of this increase will come from high-fertility
countries, 39 of which are in Africa, nine in Asia, six in Oceania and four in Latin America. Of
these countries, 15 — including Pakistan, Nigeria, the Philippines, Ethiopia, the Democratic
Republic of the Congo, the United Republic of Tanzania, Sudan, Kenya, Uganda, Iraq, Afghanistan,
Ghana, Yemen, Mozambique and Madagascar — represent 75 percent of the population.

Low-fertility countries include all but two countries in Europe, 19 Asian countries, 14
countries in the Americas and two in Africa, as well as Australia. Among these countries, nine —
including China, Brazil, the Russian Federation, Japan, Vietnam, Germany, Iran, Thailand and France
— represent 75 percent of the population.

Among intermediate-fertility countries, three-fourths of the population lives in India, the
United States, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Mexico and Egypt. Most of the population — and also textile —
growth in the future is likely to occur in high-fertility countries, which between 2011 and 2100
would see a more than threefold population increase, from 1.2 billion to 4.2 billion, according to
medium variant projections. By comparison, the population of the intermediate-fertility countries
would grow by 26 per cent, from 2.8 billion to 3.5 billion; and in the low-fertility countries,
there would be an approximate 20 percent drop in population, from 2.9 billion to 2.4 billion.

And Now?

These somewhat theoretical figures seem to point to big opportunities for new textile
business outside the fashion sector. However, as noted by investment banker Martin O. Hutchinson, a
contributing editor to the Money Map Report and Money Morning: “[T]his explosive population growth
figures to be a disaster from a global-resources standpoint – and for two very good reasons.

“First, if we want all 10.1 billion people [in 2100] to enjoy a standard of living that’s
essentially on par with us here in the West (meaning they all have automobiles, washing machines,
refrigerator/freezers, and all the rest of the latest electronic gadgets), the consumer demand will
put an impossible strain on global resources – and if the global-warming theory proves accurate,
will heat our planet up like a meatball in a wok.

“Second, the vast majority of these new people will be in very poor countries, many of which
are already stretched in terms of water, food and other resources.”

In this scenario, recycling becomes a simple matter of surviving; and recycled fiber material
is an excellent raw material for all kinds of industrial textiles products such as geotextiles and
many more.

Just Go For It

Here is the chance to do some real new business: All these countries, which are competitors
in the commodity businesses such as apparel, need new products, and mainly textiles for humankind.
Under the soil, they need geotextiles to prevent the land from being lost and specialty textiles to
keep the water where it’s needed. Above the soil, they need all kinds of housing, tents,
agrotextiles to protect food crops from too much heat, and more. And on top of that, all these
people will have a need for personal textile products such as protective garments for various
applications, hygiene and medical textiles, and so on.

Imagination

Just think about the soaring costs for raw materials and energy. On the other hand, prices
for commodity textiles are constantly shrinking. For a Western textile producer who reads these
figures, wherever he may be, there is only one way to get out of this vicious circle: stay away
from commodities, specialize. Imagination is one of the key words for future success in textiles.

If one thinks about the personal requirements of a human being in a developed society, there
are no bounds for imaginative new products, and the sky is the only limit.

June 14, 2011

Sponsors