TOKYO — May 22, 2012 — Kuraray Co., Ltd. (Kuraray) and MonoSol, LLC announced today that Kuraray
has agreed to acquire MonoSol, LLC (MonoSol), a market-leading manufacturer of water-soluble
polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) films. This acquisition by Kuraray supports its strategy to expand its
Vinyl Acetate Chemical Chain Business. Terms of the transaction were not disclosed.

Through this acquisition, Kuraray will expand its product offering of PVA films into a wider
range of industrial applications, thereby enhancing its competitiveness. Kuraray currently supplies
“POVAL” PVA film for optical-uses including a polarizing film, which is an essential component of
liquid crystal displays.

“This merger will allow MonoSol to continue to grow and service its customer base while
providing additional R&D resources – capitalizing on the expertise of both groups. Utilizing
the Kuraray Acetyl Products expertise will allow MonoSol to reach our product development goals
faster and more efficiently. We are very excited about this combination and look forward to our
future with Kuraray,” said P. Scott Bening, President and CEO of MonoSol, LLC.

The transaction is subject to approvals by the appropriate regulatory authorities. The
business will be operated as an independent company under Kuraray Holdings U.S.A., Inc. and all
employees will be transferred to the new company.

Source: MonoSol LLC

Polyamide High Performance Inc. (PHPI), Scottsboro, Ala. — the North American business unit of
high-tenacity polyamide and polyester yarns and polymers manufacturer PHP, Germany — has partnered
with Toyobo Co. Ltd., Japan — a manufacturer of fibers, fabrics, films, resins and other products —
to establish an airbag fabric weaving and finishing business in Scottsboro that will operate under
the name SafeTweave Inc.

Toyobo will provide the technology and equipment for SafeTweave’s plant, which will be
located adjacent to PHPI’s nylon spinning plant. PHPI’s plant will supply nylon 6,6 to SafeTweave,
which will sell its airbag fabrics to Toyobo Industrial Materials America Inc. for use in U.S.-made
Japanese cars. SafeTweave is expected to begin production in December 2012 and create 25 jobs.

PHPI Sales Director Manuel Guerra noted the endeavor is part of the company’s effort to bring
insourcing and manufacturing back to the United States. “We have had issues over the last few years
due to earthquakes, the tsunami in Japan and flooding in Thailand,” he said. “There’s a big push
from Japanese original equipment manufacturers to make sure they have localized supply.”

May/June 2012

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories Inc., Lansing, Mich., a developer of recombinant spider silk
technologies, has leased a new genetic engineering laboratory and is expanding its research and
development activities and production of its first product — Monster Silk, a hybrid silk produced
by transgenic silkworms.

“Up until now, all of our research has been conducted within university laboratories,” said
Kim K. Thompson, founder and CEO, Kraig Biocraft Laboratories. “We see the new laboratory as
providing the opportunity for a significant expansion of our capabilities.”

Thompson said the company has increased the caterpillar population for Monster Silk
production and ramped up production of transgenic silkworm eggs and fiber, and that the fiber being
produced now is stronger than the fiber originally documented in a peer-reviewed article published
earlier this year in “Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.” He also reported interest
from several large companies in Monster Silk’s potential for sportswear, fashion, defense and
military textile applications.

In addition, the company is ramping up development of its Generation II 100-percent
recombinant spider silk technology.

May/June 2012

Dell’Orco & Villani S.r.l., Italy — a maker of fiber blending equipment and machinery and
plants for recycling textile waste materials — now offers the Twin Carding Opener (TCO) fiber
carding and opening machine. The machine features two cylinders that work in tandem as well as a
number of peripheral working rollers; uses 20 percent of the power required for comparable
operations; offers high productivity; and has a low footprint.

The TCO comprises one section featuring two feed rollers with rigid wire clothing, a main
cylinder that can be clothed with rigid wire or supplied with lags and pins, and three working
rollers with rigid wire clothing; and a second featuring a main cylinder and five working rollers,
all with rigid wire clothing. The company reports the different combinations possible for wire
clothing choice, speed options and the distance setting between rollers and main cylinders enable
flexibility in the machine’s applications, allowing opening of a range of nonwovens production
waste. The TCO is available in a 1,500-millimeter (mm) or 1,000-mm working width, and can be fed
manually, or by a chute feed or regular hopper feeder.

May/June 2012

Editor’s note: Reprinted, with changes, from “Introduction To Nonwovens Technology,” by Subhash
K. Batra, Ph.D., and Behnam Pourdeyhimi, Ph.D., (Lancaster, Pa.: DEStech Publications Inc., 2012),
xvii-xxix, by permission of the authors and publisher.

With the exception of wool felts, fabric making has historically involved the conversion of
fibers into yarns and yarns into fabrics, primarily by weaving, knitting or lace making. The beauty
of these technologies lies in their ability to assemble thousands, indeed millions, of individual
fibers — themselves weak, difficult to handle and sometimes functionally useless — into integrated
products that are strong, foldable, absorbent, soft, and permeable. Most fascinating, the fabric is
often held together, in a highly ordered structural fashion, by frictional forces only. As such,
the woven, knit and lace fabrics on the one hand, and wool felts on the other, take the old dictum
“there is strength in numbers” a significant step further: “there is even more strength in ordered
numbers.”

Many of the physical/mechanical properties of woven, knit and lace fabrics are derived from
their unique hierarchy of structure: fiber, yarn (single or plied), and fabric. The history of the
fiber-based-product industry is replete with examples of proper selection of fibers, yarn structure
and fabric structure, followed by suitable after-treatments (dyeing, printing, finishing), leading
to unique combinations of characteristics such as strength, flexibility, draping, controlled
dimensional stability, and aesthetics in the final product.

A coated nonwoven substrate of fibrillated islands-in-the-sea fibers is the material used
in this full-sized tent for military operations.

During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries three economic necessities led to
the development of the precursors of various fabric making technologies that gained momentum during
the latter half of the twentieth century. The three necessities and the response to them may be
summarized as follows:

1. The need to reclaim acceptable quality fiber from clothing, scraps and other textiles,
   particularly those made from wool, and reuse it to make economically competitive clothing and other
   articles. This led to the development of fiber reprocessing machinery and a new industry dependent
   upon it.
2. The need to convert coarse hair not suitable for yarn making or felting, and coarse fibers of
   vegetable origin, into economically viable products. This led to the development of the needle loom
   to accomplish fiber entanglement by barbed needle punching (bonding).
3. The need to profitably utilize fiber waste, or fibers not suitable for yarn spinning, such as
   wood pulp, from the emerging manufactured- fibers industry. This led to the idea of converting
   fibers into fiberwebs, and then using adhesives or other means to give webs integrity to function
   as fabrics.
   ^1,2

In time, these three developments, in conjunction with many others, led to the revolutionary
idea that commercially acceptable, textile-like sheet structures could be made without first
converting fibers into yarns. That this could be done without weaving, knitting or lace making was
even more revolutionary.

Woodings
³ states “Heavyweight needlepunched ‘felts’ made from jute and sisal have been made
since the 1890s in both the UK and USA.” The earliest product using fiberwebs for commercial
purposes may well be the one embodied in a patent, USP 0,123,136, which was granted, in 1872, to
Milton D. Whipple, who stated:

What I claim, and desire to secure by Letters Patent, is –

1. The series of needles or pins, slightly roughened or barbed, set in a suitable frame or holder,
   and made to traverse back and forth through a bat or web of cotton or other fibrous substance, for
   the purpose of interlacing and condensing the fibers, substantially as herein described.
2. I also claim, as a new article of manufactre, a bat, web, or sheet made as hereinbefore
   described.

– Milton D. Whipple.

The seeds of the nonwovens industry may thus have been sown in the 1870s. The germination,
however, only began in earnest in the United States and in Europe during the 1920s,
⁴ 1930s,
⁵ and 1940s.
⁶ The industry finally became commercially viable in the United States and in Europe
during the 1970s, and a bit later in Japan and elsewhere. Since then the growth of the industry and
the versatility of its products has been revolutionary, even chaotic – albeit a healthy one,
manifest in the problem of defining the nature of the products
(See Chapter 1: Definitions).

The Winged Fiber™, measuring 15 by 10 microns in the illustration, top, is shown in a cross
section of a nonwoven fabric, bottom.

Nonwovens Forerunners


The concept of “nonwovens,” as fibers in a network or web form, is not new. But to trace the
origins of the concept poses a challenging problem.
⁷
First, there are the forerunners we find in nature: the nests of many birds, mammals, and
invertebrates; the spunbond-like cocoon produced by the silk worm; spider webs; the root structures
of trees, shrubs and grasses, which serve as natural erosion control akin to modern geotextiles;
the fibrous skeletal structure of bark and leaf components of shrubs and trees; the extremely fine,
spunbond-like fibrous structure of the every day egg-shell; the paper-like hornet nest.

Second, according to a reference in Wikipedia, the art of felt making from wool was
developed by the early Sumerians around the fourth millennium B.C., just as the ancient Egyptians
were devising fibrous network structures from papyrus.
⁸ Beaten bark-cloth made from the inner bark of trees of the mulberry family — paper
mulberry, bread fruit, wild fig — has been in use in Oceania, Africa, Southeast Asia, and the
Americas from prehistoric times. Several layers of this cloth can be bonded together by moisture
and beating, which presumably release the inner resins
⁹ that provide the binding material.

Third, according to Gordon: “There are several similar recurring legends about the discovery
of felt. In one, Noah attempted to make his ark more comfortable by padding the floor with sheep’s
wool. By the time the journey of forty days and nights had passed, the loose wool had turned to a
matted fabric (felt) by the pressure and moisture the animals had subjected it to.” The author
cites further examples: “Another legend placed the discovery in France in the Middle Ages. A monk
who lived in the city of Caen decided to make a pilgrimage to a distant shrine. He set out wearing
a pair of new sandals and his feet soon became sore and tired. To make them more comfortable, he
picked some wool from the backs of the sheep and put it in his sandals. When he arrived at his
destination after fifteen days of walking, he found a strong soft cloth had been created by the
constant moisture and pressure of his feet … An almost identical story takes place in the Middle
East, where a tired, foot-sore camel driver took some of the soft hair from his camels and put it
in his sandals. By the time the caravan reached its destination, he, too, had discovered felt …
it is generally believed that it was the nomadic people of Central Asia who first learned to make
it … The oldest pieces of fabric to have been found date from about 1500-1000 B.C. Felt caps as
old as 3,500 years have been found in Scandinavia, and several items from the later Bronze Age
(1400-1200 B.C.) have been found in tombs in northern Germany and Siberia.”

Fourth, Ruiji and Ke’an
¹⁰ speculate that the invention of paper, which is in some sense a nonwoven, “during the
early Western Han Dynasty (206 B.C.-8 A.D.) was most probably introduced from silk floss making. To
make the silk floss, the ‘waste’ cocoons were beaten on a bamboo screen in water. After thorough
beating, there was a layer of silk fiberweb left on the screen. This web-form material might have
been culled and used as paper …” They also suggest that, according to recent archaeological
evidence, paper made from hemp was introduced in China as early as the second century B.C. More
reliable records in Han Shu (The History of the Han Dynasty) state that Cai Lun made great
improvements in paper making in 105 A.D. Other sources assert that Ts’ai Lun first introduced
paper: it could be made from “bark, hemp, fish net and rags.”
¹¹ The art of Washi, paper making by hand, using hemp and fibers from mulberry or
certain deciduous trees, dates back to the sixth century A.D. in Japan.
¹²

Fifth, if a silk worm, ready to spin, drops to the floor, it will not stop spinning: the
result is a “flat cocoon,” or “cocoon paper,” akin to modern day spunbond web. The ancient Chinese
knew this. According to Ruiji and Ke’an, the earliest records of the technologic utilization of
this phenomenon date back to the Song Dynasty (960-1279 A.D.).

Sixth, the industrial process of papermaking was based on adaptation of a machine invented
by Nicholas-Louis Robert in 1798. “In 1801, Robert and his brother-in-law John Gamble patented the
machine in England. They divided the patent rights with their financial backers, Henry and Sealy
Fourdrinier.”
¹³ Similarly, as Gordon tells, the industrial process of wool-felt making was invented
by an American, named J. R. Williams, in 1820.

Seventh, Millman
¹⁴ suggests the invention of nonwovens can be traced to a British Letters Patent Number
114, granted in 1853 to Bellford, which detailed the use of carding machines, conveyor belting,
impregnating, mattresses, and cushions.

Eighth, Tyas
¹⁵ claims that the production of needle looms was established around 1870 by William
Bywater Ltd.; whereas Ward
¹⁶ asserts that “one of the first, if not the first, needle loom was built by …
Bywater … in 1878 and delivered to a Leeds woolen manufacturer, Hargreave & Mussey, for
making horse blankets.” Some put the date as early as 1860 and the location as both England and
Germany. It is interesting to note that an air-based entangling predecessor to the current
water-based entangling systems dates back to 1882.
¹⁷ Claim 2 of the patent states: “The herein-described method of making a fur bat in a
continuous flat sheet – that is to say, by depositing a layer of loose fur upon a traveling fabric
of substantially non-feltable fibrous material and attaching the fur to the fabric by means of an
air-current which passes through the fur and the fibrous material, substantially as set forth.”

Industry Development


Thus, while the antecedents of nonwovens technology and products can be traced to various
points in human history, most writers tend to place the beginning of the industry, as we know it
today, to the late 1920s or early 1930s. Nottebohm
¹⁸ cites a German patent, DRP Nr. 544324, dated August 26, 1928, which claimed the
production of a fleece in combination with a glued web to serve as a shoe reinforcing material:
KALFF Vliesstoffe GmbH is still in business today. Nottebohm also cites a Dutch Blaupotten Cate
process disclosure in 1930 for the manufacture of artificial leather backing from fiber fleece to
be glued with natural rubber. The earliest patent cited by Buresh
¹⁹ is dated March 12, 1929, or April 29, 1930, depending upon one’s interpretation of
their specific relevance to nonwovens technology.

According to Hays,
²⁰ laboratory and pilot scale production of non- wovens started in the 1930s. Shearer
²¹ and Millman put the industrial production of “bonded-fiber nonwoven fabrics” in
commercial quantities (a few thousand pounds) around 1942. George M. Schroder, at the University of
Chattanooga, created the first disposable diaper using nonwoven fabric in 1947.
²² In 1948, Freudenberg introduced dry-laid resin bonded fabric for interlining.

The latter part of the twentieth century spawned several commercially viable new
technologies to make fabrics that could compete with wovens, knits and lace. Most of these have
been grouped under the umbrella of nonwovens technology. Today the nonwoven roll goods and related
industries yield highly engineered products for such applications as filters, diaper and sanitary
napkin cover-stock, tear resistant envelopes, needled carpets, wipes, medical use, protective
clothing, interlining in apparel, agricultural use, insulators for space shuttle heat shield,
furniture components, high loft products, and on and on.

Traditionally, the nonwoven industry (10-100 m/min; $10-$100 MM) has been compared to
weaving (1-2 m/min; $10-100 MM), knitting (2-5 m/min; $1-50 MM) and paper industry (100-1000 m/min;
$50-100 MM) in terms of line speeds or typical plant costs. While line speed comparisons make
nonwovens look impressive, they are meaningless; for it is the unit cost of production of a
comparable product that makes the difference in its competitive edge in the market place. The plant
costs give some idea of the capital required – a possible barrier to entry – to get into the
business. But far more important is to assess the performance versus the cost needed to develop the
market and to distribute the product reliably.

The success and growth of the nonwovens industry is due, in large measure, to expanding
markets which encourage continued developments in process technologies, raw materials and final
product design to meet the existing as well as future challenges in product performance at an
acceptable cost. In other words, the raw materials available, the technologies available, and the
creative abilities of the product designers can optimize the performance specifications required in
the final product at an acceptable cost to the consumer. Table 1, which is by no means exhaustive,
lists typical properties identified by EDANA, some of which must be met by a successful product at
an optimal performance level and price.

Properties Of Nonwovens

The nonwovens industry in 2008 produced 5.78 million tonnes of roll goods worth US $21.2
billion (and a growth rate in excess of 8%), comprising 28.6% in Europe, 25% in North America,
19.7% PRC, 10% in other Asia Pacific regions. These roll goods were used in numerous applications
as illustrated by Tables 2 and 3. Table 2 presents the segmentation of end use markets classified
by EDANA, a trade organization in Europe, while Table 3 does the same for INDA, the nonwovens
industry trade organization in the United States. Neither is exhaustive, but they illustrate the
different ways end use markets can be classified based on the judgment of individuals or companies.

End Use Classification By EDANA (2004)

End Use Classification By INDA (2004)

The nonwovens industry is organized differently and separately from the textile industry.
While both, along with the paper industry, share some common heritage, the nonwoven industry during
its evolution has integrated high-speed, low-cost, innovative, value-adding processes to produce a
broad array of engineered fiber and polymer based products. In doing so, it has adapted
technologies from the pulp and paper industry, the fiber/polymer extrusion industry, and the
traditional textile industry. The traditional textile industry is intimately linked to the apparel
and home furnishing industries. The nonwovens industry is not.

Depending on the local/regional markets and their economic constraints, segments of the
nonwovens industry today include raw material suppliers, roll goods producers,
converters/fabricators of end use products, supportive machinery industry, and auxiliary material
suppliers.

Portfolio Of Technologies


Finally, a few words about the framework for our study of nonwovens technology and the
characteristics of the products made from them. “Nonwovens Technology” is in fact a portfolio of
technologies. The available fiber, or polymer raw materials to be processed, have critically
influenced the development of the technologies. At the same time, the technologies available to
process them have equally influenced the development of new fibers and polymer raw materials. The
rich portfolio of technologies under consideration offers numerous options for processing paths to
attain desired end-product characteristics. There is, thus, no unique systematic, linear way to
teach or learn the technology and its products. To that extent, this book departs from what has
become a traditional path. The paradigm used here might be likened to an impressionistic painting:
up close it consists of bold brush strokes or dabs of different colors, which may or may not be
very pleasing by themselves, nor represent any recognizable form; but, seen from a distance, the
mind of the observer integrates them into a pleasing or provocative picture.

This first volume of the book is divided into five parts. Part I deals with some useful
preliminaries, such as the issue of definitions of the structures of interest, the concept of
structure and its description in the case of two dimensional fiberwebs, the distinction between
technology as it refers to a sub-process, and
Technology as it refers to the whole raw-material-preparation-to-roll-good system.

Part II deals with the preparation and web formation steps for staple fiber-based
Technologies, including opening, blending, carding and airlay processes for both
conventional fibers as well as pulp-focused. This prepares the ground for discussion of the broad
spectrum of bonding processes in Part III. These include needle punching, hydroentanglement,
thermal bonding (inclusive of ultrasonic bonding) and resin bonding. To give some depth to thermal
bonding, some relevant concepts of heat and heat transfer are reviewed briefly in a stand-alone
chapter.

In Part IV we introduce the (historically) integrated
Technologies, such as wetlay, spunbond and meltblown; the latter two involve polymer melt
extrusion. To make the spunbond, meltblown processes more intelligible, a stand-alone chapter
reviews some relevant concepts of polymer physics. The latter also supports the subsequent
discussion on split-film nonwovens and nano or near-nano scale webs obtained via flash spinning,
electrospinning and those obtained via bicomponent fibers.

In Part V we discuss processes and the idea of integration to produce heterogeneous
fiberwebs (second order structures, composites) and hybrid (higher order) structures, which combine
more than one level of structure to yield structures with enhanced performance attributes. Some of
the processes are those introduced previously, while others such as stitchbonding, co-forming, and
NAPCO technology are introduced for the first time.

The book’s aim is to provide a structured path for teaching the subject matter to
undergraduate as well as graduate students. That requires the instructors to selectively define
suitable paths for the two levels.

The structure of the book is also designed to assist self-learning by industrial
practitioners at different levels of experience and preparation. We hope it will deepen their
appreciation of the diverse technologies available to them and stimulate the flow of their creative
juices to design and produce products that benefit humankind.

Finally, we end with an appeal to teachers, students and other readers to send us any
comments and suggestions that will improve our textbook and help make it a truly useful one. Please
make up your own problems and exercises and share them with us. For such contributions and others,
we thank you in advance.

In anticipation,

Subhash K. Batra

(subhash_batra@ncsu.edu)

Behnam Pourdeyhimi

(behnam_pourdeyhimi@ncsu.edu)

Subhash K. Batra, Ph.D., is Charles A. Cannon Professor, Emeritus; and Director Emeritus,
Nonwovens Cooperative Research Center, North Carolina State University (NCSU).

Behnam Pourdeyhimi, Ph.D., is William A. Klopman Distinguished Professor; and Director,
Nonwovens Institute, NCSU.

Footnotes (Endnotes in this case):

¹USP 2,825,389.

²Subsequently, the manufactured-fiber industry fueled the growth of the nonwoven roll
goods and related industries.

³Regenerated Cellulose Fibers, Edited by Calvin Woodings, CRC Press, 2000, Woodhead
Publishing, 2001.

⁴Joseph, Gatti, Wadding and bat; USP 1,695,805 (1928).

⁵N. H. Brewster, Sheet material and method of making the same , USP 1,978,620.

⁶Batra, S. K., S. P. Hersh, R. L. Barker, D. R. Buchanan, B. S. Gupta, T. W. George and
M. H. Mohamed, “Neither Woven Nor Knit: A New System for Classifying Textiles,” in
Principles of Nonwovens, INDA , Cary NC (1992).

⁷See the previous reference.

⁸http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/prehistory/egypt/dailylife/papyrus.html.

⁹Gordon, Beverly,
Feltmaking, Watson-Guptill Publications, New York (1980).

¹⁰Ruiji, Yang and Ke’an, Sheng, “The History and Prospect of Nonwovens in China,”
Journal of East China Institute of Textile Science and Technology, No. 1, 27-34 (1984).

¹¹Langer, William L.,
An Encyclopedia of World History, Houghton & Mifflin Co., Boston (1952).

¹²Koda, M., “Washi,” in
Tajyo, special edition, Shikosha Publishing Co., Japan (1982).

¹³http://historywired.si.edu/detail.cfm?ID=397.

¹⁴Millman, George E., “The Expanding Market for Nonwovens,”
American Dyestuff Reporter, 58/7, 32-39, April (1969).

¹⁵Tyas, T., “The Design of Needle Looms,” in
Needle-Felted Fabrics, ed. P. Lennox-Kerr, The Textile Trade Press, Manchester, UK.
(1972).

¹⁶Ward, D., “A Hundred Years of Needle Looms,” in
Nonwovens Yearbook, Nonwovens Report International (1979).

¹⁷US Patent 253,162 (1882).

¹⁸Nottebohm, C. L., “Vliesstoffe auf trockenem Weg,”
Chemiefasern 9, 667-676 (1968).

¹⁹Buresh, Francis M., Nonwoven Fabrics, Reinhold Publishing Corporation, New York
(1962).

²⁰Anonymous, “Nonwovens-Threat or Opportunity,”
American Dyestuff Reporter, 58/7, 40-41, April (1969).

²¹Shearer, Howard E., “Methods of Producing Bonded-Fiber Fabrics,”
American Dyestuff Reporter, 41, P874-P879, December 22 (1952).

²²http://www.disposablediaper.net/content.asp?2.

May/June 2012