Germany-based ICA Bremen is developing a full traceability system for cotton. The cotton testing laboratory reports it has made progress in accurately measuring the percentage of marked cotton — cotton that had an identifier added during the ginning stage — in final garments with a simple scanning step. ICA Bremen’s goal is to quantify results with a percentage, versus providing a yes or no answer. The technology is ready to undergo field trials after completing testing in the laboratory.
“Our traceability system will be a massive step forward for major brands, retailers and growers, replacing the current tagging system and cutting out the need for supply chain certification services,” said Kai Hughes, managing director, ICA Bremen.
Germany-based worsted yarn producer Südwolle Group has acquired Safil S.p.A., as well as an 80-percent share in Gruppo Tessile Industriale (GTI), both worsted yarn manufacturers based in Italy. Südwolle acquired Safil and 50 percent of the GTI shares from Italy-based Finsavio S.p.A. Cesare Savio and Alberto Savio, Finsavio owners and sons of Safil founder Fernando Savio, will continue as Safil’s CEO and CFO respectively.
The remaining 30 percent of GTI was acquired from Alberto Frignani, founder and CEO of GTI. Frignani retained the remaining 20 percent of GTI shares, and continues as CEO of the company.
No financial terms of the acquisition were disclosed.
The resulting enhanced yarn portfolio allows Südwolle to offer fashion, luxury and non-apparel customers a greater selection of products. The company also gains a strong foothold in the Italian yarn markets.
Cleveland-based polymer provider PolyOne Corp. has acquired Magenta Master Fibers, a developer of specialty solid color concentrates for the fiber industry, from BASF for $22 million. Magenta has operations in Milan, Italy, and Shanghai, and joins PolyOne’s Global Color, Additives and Inks segment. In 2016, PolyOne expects the acquisition to add $16 million to revenues and be accretive to earnings.
“By offering both liquid and solid masterbatch solutions, we better ensure that the chosen technology is the best one for each customer’s specific needs,” said John V. Van Hulle, president, Global Color, Additives and Inks, PolyOne. “With our acquisition of Magenta, we’re very pleased to be building this same, deep breadth of specialty solid and liquid colorant solutions for fiber applications.”
Germany-based Kelheim Fibres continues to advance the development of its infrared (IR)-reflecting fibers. The company has conducted spinning trials during which mineral-based IR-reflecting particles in different concentrations were permanently incorporated into a viscose fiber’s core. According to Kelheim, testing indicates the fibers can effectively reflect sunlight and provide a cooling benefit. At the same time, the fiber can reflect thermal radiation emitted by the body back to the body to provide a warming sensation.
“Comfortable feel-good clothes and functional special clothing are just two obvious applications for our new IR fiber,” said Dr. Daniela Bauer, research & development, Kelheim Fibres. “The level of loading can be adapted according to the requirements of the final product, which provides high versatility. As a next step, the fiber will be tested for its effectiveness in various end-applications in cooperation with our partners.”
Navigating the sustainability maturity path takes a company from reactive to proactive, and possibly to innovation.
By Shelly Martin
The term sustainability is so amorphous these days that companies often feel paralyzed with what actionable steps they can take to make their business and products more environmentally friendly. To further complicate the issue, there is a perception that the environment is a niche area of business operations. However, in reality all businesses must operate within the environment and its constraints.
Mega-trends like declining resources, radical transparency and increasing expectations can be thought of as analogous to other trends of the past like quality, lean manufacturing and e-commerce. These trends were nice-to-haves early on, however, they now drive business success and have become mandatory.
Value is created across stakeholders through sustainability, including product marketing via product differentiation and brand enhancement, research and development with innovation and design optimization, and finance and operations with identified areas for cost reduction. By collecting data for a life cycle assessment (LCA) study, a company learned that it was using both hot water and chlorine in a sanitizing step. Only one method is necessary to safely sanitize, and the LCA identified that costly redundancy. In addition, value can be created by identifying potential areas for risk and regulation.
Figure 1: The square and the circle. Source: Andrew Winston interpretation of Ray Anderson comments, The Big Pivot. 2014. pp. 87-88.
Sustainability Maturity Path
The sustainability maturity path typically starts with companies being reactive and trying to comply with regulation. This may lead to risk management, where a company may use sustainability assessment to manage and reduce reputational risk and prevent the public relation crises that can result from a lack of knowledge about environmental and social impacts of product and supply chains.
From there, companies may become more proactive, which may include starting to understand opportunities to increase operational efficiency to reduce costs and environmental impacts by minimizing water, energy and materials usage. That understanding may expand to the company’s supply chain, where it may start to evaluate and monitor its supply chain to reduce environmental impacts and drive social policies.
Next, companies may move into the innovation realm where they may start to build sustainable product portfolios, as well as integrate sustainability metrics in new product development. Now, sustainability is evaluated alongside cost and performance. The company also may start to innovate when it comes to its business model, which may drive market transformation.
There are many different methodologies and tools in the sustainable product development toolbox, including environmental risk assessment, where site-specific toxicity impacts are analyzed; carbon and water footprints, which assess just one impact category; health product declarations; biomimicry; and life cycle costing.
Design For Sustainability
In addition, there are the Design for Sustainability guidelines that acknowledge the environment must be a critical consideration along with the traditional metrics around economics and performance. These general and qualitative guidelines are meant to be followed during new product development, and are based on learnings from LCAs and other sustainability tools. The guidelines are constrained by product performance requirements and consumer needs. Globally recognized, this method is intended to help companies improve profit margins, product quality, market opportunities, environmental performance and social benefits. Companies can achieve this win-win situation for shareholders, consumers, and the public by improving efficiencies in the products and services it designs, produces and delivers. This is where sustainability becomes tangible.
Materials Selection, Reduction
Selecting low-impact materials and reducing the amount of materials used is an extremely effective way to reduce a product’s environmental impacts. Eliminate unnecessary parts and assemblies, and optimize a design to reduce material usage, which in turn, reduces transportation impacts. Also increase the amount of recycled materials used in the product, and utilize materials that can be readily recycled at end of life or product disposal. Avoid energy intensive materials, such as aluminum, for products with a short life span. Companies can also find alternatives to non-ferrous metals such as copper and nickel because of the harmful emissions generated during production, and eliminate toxic materials or additives. Material selection tools and preferred materials lists can be helpful when implementing this guideline.
Optimizing Production Techniques
There are many ways to optimize production techniques including incorporating the Design for Assembly principles to reduce production steps, optimizing the design to reduce the energy used during manufacturing, eliminating or reducing surface treatments such as powder coatings, and minimizing manufacturing waste and product scrap recycling.
In addition, organizations can motivate manufacturing partners and suppliers to increase energy efficiency. Some companies have competitions at their plants to see which shift can reduce the most energy after normalizing to production. Another option is to increase the use of renewable energy. The Alchemist, a small Vermont-based brewery, moved to solar power because it made good business sense. Yes, being environmentally conscious as well as a leader in its industry was important for The Alchemist, but ultimately that was not the sole reason the brewery decided to invest in renewable energy — it also made economic sense.
Distribution System Optimization
There is a clear hierarchy when it comes to the environmental impacts of different transportation modes. Transporting by container ship and train is environmentally preferable to truck, which is preferable to air freight. Other ways to optimize the distribution system include increasing the use of reusable bulk packaging such as pallets, minimizing volumes and weight of packaging, and ensuring that all packaging is critical to function. In addition, wherever possible, products can be shipped unassembled to reduce transportation volume.
In the 1950s and 60s, Inguar Kampad, a Sweden-based furniture retailer, realized that much of the cost of making furniture was tied to the assembly process — putting legs on tables, for example — and in shipping the products. Kampad changed his business model to sell unassembled furniture that shipped cheaply in flat boxes. He undersold his competitors, who were so furious they launched a boycott against his company and stopped filling his orders. Desperate, he looked south to Poland, which had plenty of wood and cheap labor. However, few companies were outsourcing at that time, especially to a communist country. Kampad did not let that stop him pursuing his business model though, and his company, IKEA, is still prosperous and thriving today.
Reducing Impact During Use
Ways to reduce impacts during use include reducing energy consumption, making the default state the most desirable from an environmental standpoint, making sure using the product does not result in hidden and harmful emissions and wastes, minimizing consumables needed, and reducing scrap generation.
Hypertherm — a Hanover, N.H.-based company that designs and manufactures advanced cutting systems — learned that the majority of the environmental impacts of its machines, from raw material extraction through disposal, came from scrap. This led Hypertherm to start working with its customers on nesting technology. In addition to nesting, it also is exploring methods to pair clients based on the size of sheets they need to reduce waste from scrap material using the idiom that “one man’s trash is another man’s treasure.”
Initial Lifetime Optimization
In an article titled “Repair is a Radical Act,” Rose Marcario, CEO, Ventura, Calif.-based Patagonia Inc., said: “We live in a culture when replacement is king … these conditions create a society of product-consumers, not owners. And there’s a difference. Owners are empowered to take responsibility for their purchases — from proper cleaning to repairing, reusing and sharing. Consumers take, make, dispose and repeat — a pattern that is driving us towards ecological bankruptcy. And as businesses, we have a responsibility to make higher quality products to help reclaim the act of ownership; make parts accessible and repair easy … . We need to enable our customers to become owners — and that will require a seismic shift in our approach. It’s a radical thought, but change can start with just a needle and thread.”
Optimizing the initial lifetime of products includes avoiding weak links that lead to a reduced lifespan and require maintenance; designing so that the product can be repaired and upgraded, as well as meet end-user needs for a long time; increasing the functionality of the product and designing the product’s appearance to increase aesthetic life.
Carpet tiles manufactured by LaGrange, Ga.-based Interface Inc. are a great example of an optimized product. The company’s traditional business model was to manufacture and distribute broadloom carpet through typical channels. This carpet lasted approximately 5 to 7 years, at which time worn out carpet was thrown out and disposed of in a landfill. Then, new broadloom carpet was manufactured and sold. Interface observed that 20 percent of the carpet gets 80 percent of the wear, and with no value at end of life, the carpet inevitably ends up in a landfill. So the company reinvented its business model and moved into the innovation realm of the Sustainability Maturity Path. Interface designed carpet tiles so only the worn out sections needed replacing. In addition, it started leasing the carpet tiles, which meant that Interface retained responsibility for the entire life cycle of the carpet tile. Interface also redesigned the carpet tile to allow for easy material separation and recycling at end of life, creating a much more sustainable carpet product.
Optimizing The End of Life System
Reduce. Reuse. Recycle. Optimizing the end of life system includes designing with recycling in mind — through material selection and designs that can be disassembled — as well as reuse of product and avoiding premature obsolescence. Other options to optimize the end of life include assessing the possibility of take-back programs and avoiding toxic elements to reduce air pollution when incinerated. Considering the Design for Disassembly principles can help ensure that a product system can be disassembled for a minimal cost and effort. These principles include making products simpler, components accessible, reducing the number of distant parts, using common parts for components like fasteners and zips, and using fewer different types of materials and adhesives. Often times these strategies also contribute to product serviceability.
The Herman Miller Mirra® Chair originally took two hours for someone to take it apart at its end of life. Two hours was too long, so Herman Miller redesigned the chair with Design for Disassembly in mind. The new design can be disassembled in 15 minutes and 96-percent of its parts now are recyclable.
Parting Thoughts
Sustainable product development is an evolving and iterative approach. It may start by brainstorming opportunities or evaluating ideas around which material is environmentally preferable, or by developing Design for Sustainability guidelines specific for your company or conducting life cycle assessments on key products. What is learned may then get integrated into product development, which may in turn lead to additional brainstorming opportunities.
Expanding viewpoints beyond a company’s four walls will open up the opportunities to reduce the environmental impacts of products. This may include considering what happens during product use and at the end of life. It’s important to strive to understand how products can be made more sustainable while increasing consumer value. It is possible for a company to move along the sustainability maturity path, from being reactive to proactive, and perhaps even venturing into the innovation realm.
Editor’s note: Shelly Martin is a project manager with EARTHSHIFT, a Huntington, Vt.-based Life Cycle Assessment software, training and consulting provider. The article is based on Martin’s presentation given at the 2015 Textile World Innovation Forum.
Advances in spinning technology centered on machine refinements and the use of data to analyze and communicate.
By Dr. William Oxenham
There was no doubt that ITMA 2015 was bigger and busier than previous ITMAs, and it also was clear that attendees were truly international. In the areas covering spinning technologies, the booths were well attended. There were no radically new developments in processing technologies, and this was a show about consolidation and refinement of ideas and technologies.
Progressive improvements in sensors, drives, computer speed and access to massive data storage including cloud-based systems along with software advances in big data analytics, have been adopted by many textile machinery makers. When these various technology improvements are coupled together they are used to provide manufacturers with new tools to ensure optimized yarn production. This not only relates to maintaining and improving yarn quality, but achieving this economically, using minimum energy and fiber. This concept was adopted by the biggest machinery manufacturers who packaged it into a thematic approach to marketing their products and services. Thus while the general goals are “to produce high quality yarns efficiently and economically, with the optimum use of resources including fibers” these ideals were promoted slightly differently by different companies at ITMA. For example, Switzerland-based Rieter used the groupings “Economy, Quality and Flexibility” in its promotional materials, whereas the Switzerland-based Saurer Group adopted E3 — Energy, Economics and Ergonomics.
While many of the ideas promoted may not seem totally new, the huge amount of data acquired coupled with advanced analysis methods, can be used not only to analyze the impact of many parameters on yarn quality and productivity, but also to afford remote process control, and furthermore provide guidelines for machine maintenance and communicate warnings of impending component failures.
Opening, Cleaning And Blending
The blowroom was probably one of the first to benefit from data utilization in the optimization of bale laydowns from fiber data. Blowroom improvements have focused around efficient opening, cleaning and blending of fibers, while minimizing unwanted fiber loss and fiber damage. The use of online data collection from various sensors enables the optimization of different components to achieve these goals, such as with Germany-based Trützschler GmbH & Co. KG’s WasteControl system.
Based on the number of manufacturers offering foreign fiber detectors and eliminators, it is clear that contaminants in the raw material are a major issue. While machines have been available for a number of years to tackle this problem, they tended to have limitations in the type of contaminant that could be detected and ejected. Advances in sensor and lighting technology, particularly LEDs, have broadened the range of contaminants that can be removed.
The Centra from Italy-based Loptex S.r.l. is an optosonar system that combines sonar technology — using piezo emitters/detectors — with a series of 24 color cameras. The sonar system detects white polypropylene (PP) and plastics with the same color as the cotton processed, as well as hidden contaminants such as various plastics of different transparencies and fluorescence. The optical system detects and eliminates contaminants including colored and colorless.
The Trützschler T-Scan TS-T5 has added a G sensor for shiny foreign parts detection to the exsiting F module, which detects colored dark fibers; P module for transparent foreign parts; and UV module for fluorescent foreign parts. Additionally, the system now uses 1,072 LED lights for improved illumination with lower energy usage.
Switzerland-based Uster Technologies AG reports the Uster Jossi Vision Shield 2 provides improved foreign fiber detection by utilizing an imaging spectroscope that operates across a much greater wavelength. This enables the detection of contamination even within the invisible range of infrared and ultraviolet (UV) light. This includes light pastel colors, and particles of similar size to a fiber. Additionally, the spectroscope differentiates cotton from plastics such as PP because cotton tufts exhibit a halo effect under lighting, while plastics do not.
All of the above systems also incorporate sophisticated imaging software and systems to measure the speed of the impurities so that they may be accurately ejected.
Carding
The debate initiated at ITMA 2011 over which carding manufacturer offers the largest carding area, seemed to linger on, but was now directed at claims over the highest production per floor area. Maximum carding production levels, reported by the some of the major machinery makers include the C701 from Italy-based Marzoli Machines Textile S.r.l. with a production rate of 250 kilograms per hour (kg/h); Rieter’s C70 with a rate of 280 kg/h; and Trützschler’s TC 15 at 260 kg/h. Each manufacturer offered options to improve quality and efficiency. Rieter promoted its Integrated Grinding System (IGS) to ensure permanently sharp clothing that not only maintains high-quality card webs, but also potentially extends the life of the card wire. Trützschler demonstrated the T-CON carding information system that interacts with several other components to ensure that optimum settings are utilized. Trützschler also displayed the can filling station
T-MOVE, which essentially means that the sliver feeder is moved from full to empty can rather than the full can being replaced with an empty can under the coiler. This was coupled with the concept of jumbo cans 1.2 meters in diameter by 1.5 meters high, which are claimed to offer 43-percent more sliver per can. Advantages of jumbo cans include moving fewer cans, which yields labor savings; and also fewer piecings in the sliver.
Trützschler also showed the latest version of its IDF 2 linked drawframe with drafts of up to 2.0 and output speeds of 700 meters per minute (m/min). The addition of an autoleveling system makes the system an attractive approach for rotor spinning directly from the card.
Trützschler’s IDF 2 linked drawframe
Drawing And Combing
The newer developments in combing were largely associated with increased productivity, improved quality and reduced cost through greater automation. Rieter’s E 36 OMEGAlap can achieve production of 600 kg/h, which is claimed to be 50-percent higher than competitors. The orientation of fibers is optimized for better combing performance, and the use of a uniform pressure distribution and constant winding speed combine to give outstanding lap formation. The Trützschler-Toyoda TSL lap former claims production levels of 520 kg/h at speeds of 180 m/min. Both lapformers can use manual or automatic transport systems to the combers.
The major development in combing is the use of automatic lap change and piecing. This was shown by Rieter in its E86 comber with ROBOlap, and by Trützschler-Toyoda in the TCO 12 comb, which was also equipped with an autoleveling system on the final drafting unit. India-based Lakshmi Machine Works Ltd. (LMW) exhibited the LK 69 combing machine, which like the other combers, was reported to be capable of 600 combing cycles per minute.
While there is significant automation in preparatory machinery, the sophistication of a modern yarn production entity becomes really apparent when viewing the roving and spinning frame. The sight of an automatic roving frame with autodoffer and package transportation to the ring frame, which in turn may be fitted with autodoffing and link winding, is a strong visual message that the industry is a high-tech enterprise that can compete with any industry in terms of how it utilizes advances in manufacturing technology.
The roving frame used to be regarded as a necessary evil that was somewhat a bottleneck in yarn manufacturing. Advances in automation have certainly improved this situation and different levels of automation were available from the machinery manufacturers. For example China-based Jingwei— China Texmatech Co. Ltd. (CTMTC) — or from auxiliary manufacturers such as Germany-based Sohler-Neuenhaser GmbH & Co. KG, Spain-based Electro-Jet S.A., and Italy-based Trascar S.p.A. — formerly known as U.T.I.T. — who offer customized doffing and package transport systems.
Marzoli showed its FT6 Roving frame with roving transfer and an integrated bobbin cleaner. This cleaned any remnants of roving from the packages that were returning from the ring frame as they were transferred back to the creel on the roving fame. The FT6 is offered with up to 224 positions and because of smaller headstock, the machine has a smaller footprint. An additional feature is that each position is equipped with a roving sensor, which stops the machine in the event of a breakage. It is claimed that the use of this device obviates the need for suction to remove drafted fibers in the event of an end break, which provides an energy saving of 4 kilowatt hours.
The Saurer Group showed the new ZinserSpeed 5A roving frame, which claims that optimum use of blowing and suction can result in 20-percent energy savings. This machine can be offered in a manual or automatic version because the roving bench moves out to facilitate the doffing cycle and the automatic version has a doffing time of less than 2 minutes. The system was linked via the RoWeLift transfer station to the roving bobbin transport system, which at the show linked to the ZinserImpact 72 ring frame.
Ring Spinning
As was the case at previous shows, the majority of ring frame manufacturers demonstrated various forms of compact spinning that offer distinct advantages in terms of yarn and fabric properties coupled with greater productivity. This technology does however require greater power for compaction during yarn manufacturing and also there are higher labor costs associated with the additional maintenance required on the compact system. The ZinserImpact 72, which uses a perforated top compacting apron, is claimed to be the world’s longest spinning frame with up to 2,016 positions. The advantage in utilizing the longer frame, from an example of 1,200 spindles, is 21-percent space savings and an 11-percent reduction in processing costs. Saurer reports this compact system’s use of twin fans not only maintains a more uniform suction but can save 50-percent in power costs. The compacting apron design also has been optimized so that the flexion and tension it experiences as it rotates render it self-cleaning.
Rieter showed its K 46 with its now familiar roller compacting system producing Com4® yarns in a machine with up to 1,824 spindles. This machine also incorporates a suction unit for each side of the machine. Additionally, Rieter claims its system only needs 25 percent of the compacting energy of other apron systems, and that the unit obviously does not need frequent apron replacement.
Marzoli showed the Mac3000 compact spinning system, with a perforated bottom roller that can be fitted to several Marzoli spinning machines or retrofitted to existing machines. LMW showed its new compact spinning system LRJ9, which has up to 1,824 spindles. This machine uses a newly developed compacting bottom apron system rather than the mechanical RoCoS type compacting unit that was exhibited at previous shows.
Marzoli’s Mac3000 compact spinning system
Almost all ring frames were available with automatic doffing and transport systems and most either use an in-house slubbing mechanism — such as Rieter’s Variospin for example — or systems such as those offered by Switzerland-based Amsler Tex AG or Italy-based Caipo Automazione Industriale. Additionally, there were several smaller companies showing attachments and modifications for fancy yarns, including Japan-based Toyota Industries Corp., that demonstrated the RX 300 compact spinning system with independent dual roving feed producing yarns with alternating colors along their length.
Rotor Spinning
The two market leaders, Rieter and Saurer Schlafhorst, showed the latest renditions of their technically advanced fully-automated spinning machines.
Schlafhorst’s Autocoro 9 featuring the Corobox SE 20 spinning units now is available with up to 720 positions per machine equipped with six doffing and cleaning robots. The machine is capable of commercial rotor speeds in the range of 160-180,000 revolutions per minute (rpm) and yarn production speeds of up to 300 m/min. Because the machine essentially consists of an assembly of individually driven spin boxes, there is the potential to spin up to five different lots at once and 24 spindles can piece at the same time, which has significant benefits for smaller lots. An added feature is the flexibility available in package build which ranges from packages that are 10-percent denser than typical packages, through to soft-wound dye-packages. Schlafhorst also showed the manual BD 6 which is based around Autocoro technology and is capable of speeds of up to 230 m/min.
Rieter’s R 66 rotor spinning machine is available with up to 700 positions, with the capability of spinning a different lot on each side of the machine. The new S 66 Spinbox contains several refinements aimed at improving process and product quality, which includes: easier navel change where the navel type is clearly visible; and the improved airflow system, originally developed by Suessen, which is used to optimize airflow around the rotor. The use of individual drives is a differentiating factor between the major machine makers, and Rieter contends that its system is more energy efficient with less power loss to heat.
Air-Jet/Vortex Spinning
Rieter’s J 26 automated air-jet spinning machine is available with up to 200 spin units and four robots. The machine is capable of processing different lots on each side and can run at speeds of up to 500 m/min. Rieter reports the double-sided configuration saves up to 60 percent in space and reduced mill operating costs. The P 26 polyester attachment, a water-based misting system that does not contain oil, ensures long production cycles when spinning 100-percent polyester. While this addition was designed the overcome issues associated with depositions created when running polyester, it also leads to beneficial increases in yarn strength while reducing yarn hairiness, according to the company. Rieter has also adapted their Q 10A clearer for the J 26 and this not only senses the usual defects, but can also monitor excess water and check the yarn for untwisted portions that may be present. While there is a fiber loss associated with this type of spinning system, Rieter has reduced this loss to 2-3 percent when processing cotton fiber.
Rieter’s J 26 automated air-jet spinning machine
Japan-based Murata Machinery Ltd. reports the Vortex III 870 offers improved yarn quality, ease of use and performance. The single-sided machine can have up to 96 spinning positions running at speeds of up to 500 m/min. According to Murata, use of the STS — Spinning Tension Stability — system, which utilizes a friction roller rather than nip rollers to withdraw the yarn, provides longer term spinning stability at higher speeds. The machine was demonstrated at ITMA running Ne 40 polyester and a Ne 10 polyester/rayon blend on alternate days. Similar to the Rieter system, there are presently issues running 100-percent polyester and Murata’s solution is to use the Polymaster system which feeds “oil” and compressed air to counteract the problems of high friction and dust deposits inside the yarn formation nozzle. A spokesman for Murata indicated that its present goal is to extend the range of yarn counts that can be viably spun on the system.
Winding
In recent years, the manufacturers of air-jet/vortex and rotor spinning machines have made significant improvements in the quality of the yarn packages that they can make, and have formats to cater for various downstream processing. However ring spinning is still the dominant spinning process, and while the use of link winding — coupling ring frame to winder — is commonplace, there is still a big market for stand alone winders.
The trends in other areas of spinning, with respect to features such as improved efficiency and energy savings, were clearly also adopted in winding. Big players in staple-yarn processing include Savio, Saurer/Schlafhorst and Murata. Saurer reports the brand new Autoconer 6 from Schlafhorst consumes up to 20-percent less energy, is 6-percent more productive, and offers improvements in tension control and waxing plus improved splicing. Murata exhibited the QPRO Plus bobbin-tray winder and FPRO Plus link coner with claimed higher productivity, quality and energy efficiency. Italy-based Savio Macchine Tessili S.p.A. showed its fifth-generation winding machine the Eco PulsarS, which offers energy savings of up to 30 percent coupled with up to 10 percent increase in productivity, according to the company. The machine also includes new features such as the Controlled Cut System, Yarn Tension Control, Waste Collection and Separation System, and upgraded splicing solutions. Savio also presented the Polar Multicone technology, which uses drumless, digital yarn-layering technology to provide greater flexibility in formatting packages for subsequent processing such as dyeing, warping, weft, double twisting and knitting. In addition, Savio showed the latest rendition of its Volufil system, which essentially incudes thermal treatment — relaxation and/or setting — as part of a winding process.
Savio’s Polar Multicone with drumless, digital yarn-layering technology
Data Systems
There were many data systems on display at ITMA, and while some were proprietary to the different machinery makers there also were several third parties offering retrofit systems and software. It was clear that the products shown at ITMA were much more sophisticated and capable systems that not only had the potential for more data inputs, but also were much more refined in what they did with the data and the communication with the user.
Uster exhibited the new USTER® Tester 6, which when simply viewed as a testing machine offers significant improvements over the previous versions, with the potential of performing certain tests at 800m/min. The base unit measures sliver, roving and yarn uniformity, plus registers atmospheric test conditions. Additional sensors are available to measure: overall hairiness; hairiness length distribution; yarn diameter, shape, density and variation; and yarn trash and dust. In addition, the use of the Knowledge Based System (KBS) enables the detection of periodicities and determines the source of these defects. It also is possible to analyze the various structural parameters associated with slub yarns. The Uster Tester 6, when linked to the Uster Quality Expert — which gathers online and offline data from the total manufacturing process — is able to display this information as dashboards and comparative reports. Additionally, the system — comprised of the Uster Tester 6, plus databanks and software — is capable of using the measured data and the huge data bank of Uster Statistics to predict features such weaving performance and fabric appearance. Indeed, when incorporating data on hairiness, the system also can make predictions about pilling characteristics. As with systems offered by other manufacturers, it is possible to remotely access the various reports from mobile devices, which is particularly useful when assessing the overall performance of various processes in the manufacturing line.
USTER® Tester 6
Rieter’s latest version of its SPIDERweb Mill Control System offers several improvements plus access is now possible with mobile device and appropriate app. The sensors necessary for this system can be incorporated into new machines or retrofitted to certain existing machines. The system gathers data from several different modules — machine performance, quality of product, power consumption, temperature and humidity for example — which it then collates and analyses. It also incorporates historical data and then creates various reports which can be displayed in the mill as wallboards — efficiency of production, for example — or generate holistic views of the mill or perform very specific analyzes of say one particular spinning frame. Additionally, the self-perpetuating database can be queried and analyzed to determine the impact of factors such as temperature and humidity changes on product quality, processing efficiency and energy consumption.
Trützschler demonstrated its T-Data system that gathers and analyzes data from blowroom through to finisher. This includes data gathered from components integrated into Trützschler machines including trash and neps in carding. The system produces reports and enables queries and visual displays of single or multiple machines including variations in shift data. As with other systems, energy monitoring is an integral part of the system. T-Data can be accessed via smartphone through downloadable apps.
Marzoli showed its YarNet mill management software, which features status displays for each machine including running and doffing, plus providing details of processing conditions and efficiencies. Details of drive components and motors are collected together with information on energy consumption. This data is used not only to assess the processing, but also can be used to quantify the effects of any changes in processing conditions on the final product quality. Additionally, by using virtual board wrapping it is possible to use the data to display the effect of possible changes in slub parameters of final fabric appearance. Marzoli utilizes the data in a further way through its Marzoli Remote Maintenance (MRM) system, which is a joint development with Microsoft. The use of cloud computing and analytics takes selected mill data and uses this to create an optimized maintenance schedule for the mill. By monitoring changes in machine efficiency, energy usage and motor temperatures, it is possible to predict impending problems and plan repairs, including gathering necessary components and required labor so that repairs can be carried out efficiently.
Saurer Schlafhorst’s Plant Control System gathers data online and prepares different level reports for the mill, groups of machines or individual machines and/or spinning positions. Saurer reports the system is useful for optimizing productivity and quality, as well as giving rapid alerts on off standard process/product. Saurer also announced its new Service Unlimited (SUN) program to ensure maximum efficiency during the whole product life cycle. This program is the agglomeration of various installation and aftercare functions such as consulting, installation, technology transfer, original parts, maintenance, and repairs and upgrades, to ensure continued optimum performance of Saurer products.
Editor’s Note: Dr. William “Bill” Oxenham is the Abel C. Lineberger Professor and Associate Dean of Academic Programs at Raleigh, N.C.-based North Carolina State University’s College of Textiles, Department of Textile Engineering, Chemistry and Science.
MILAN, Italy — February 2016 — Vietnam has by now become a major market for textile machinery manufacturers. Having emerged as an important manufacturing hub for the garments sector, thanks to low labour costs, the Country has now received a further boost for developing its textile industry, through the free trade agreements recently signed with the European Union and United States.
“In the face of these new scenarios,” explains Raffaella Carabelli, president of ACIMIT, the Association of Italian Textile Machinery Manufacturers, “we’re expecting over the medium term a strong boost in demand for textile machinery by Vietnamese textile manufacturers.”
Vietnam already ranks 8th among export markets for Italian textile machinery companies, with exports to Vietnam over the first nine months of 2015 reaching 31 million euros, a 53% increase compared to the same period for 2014. Among the products most in demand are finishing/ennobling and spinning machinery.
The true litmus test for the actual growth of the Vietnamese textile industry will be the upcoming Saigontex, to be held in Hochiminh City from 30 March to 2 April 2016. The common exhibition area organized by the Italian Trade Agency for the promotion abroad and internationalization of Italian businesses, and by ACIMIT, the Association of Italian Textile Machinery Manufacturers, will host the following 12 machinery manufacturers, all ACIMIT associated members: A. Piovan, Beta Machinery, Carù, Fadis, Ferraro, JK Group, Mei, Pozzi Leopoldo, Pugi Group, Ratti, Rollmac, Tonello.
GAZIANTEP, Turkey — February 15, 2016 —Mogul MOPET® TCS, a spunbond fabric made from mono-component trilobal filament, has proven itself flame resistant in accordance with BS5852-2 without fire retardant impregnation of the fabric.
The fabric was produced from a PET polymer chip containing a special fire retard component. The raw material additive enabled the resultant fabric to self extinguish a flame and also self extinguish any subsequent smouldering. The additive to the polymer chip does not contain any toxic fire retardants from the halogen group elements nor heavy metal flame retardant additives.
Home furnishings covered by a fire resistant fabric may allow for reduction in the overall amount of fire retardant materials injected into the furnishing’s padding and components since the fire source is generally external to the furnishing. The aim is to reduce cost and the toxic gas generation associated with fire retardants in the event of fire.
The successful accreditation is part of Mogul’s drive to produce better performing fabrics for specialized and differentiated end use.
Mogul Spokesperson, CEO Serkan Gogus stated “the successful testing of this flame resistant fabric is one of the many steps we are taking to better serve customer demand for upgraded and special purpose nonwoven rolled goods. The critical requirement to ensure our communities benefit from safer clothing, furniture, automotive parts and construction components makes this a very satisfying result.”
QUÉBEC, Canada — February 15, 2016 — Duvaltex Inc., a holding company specializing in textile innovation and development, announced today that the company has acquired True Textiles Inc. The acquisition includes all of the True Textiles business units — True, Guilford of Maine and Teknit. Duvaltex also currently owns Victor Textiles Inc., a North American textile manufacturer.
As a result of this acquisition, Duvaltex becomes the largest manufacturer of commercial or contract interior fabrics in the U.S. and Canada, serving the office furniture, institutional, healthcare and hospitality industries.
This acquisition will provide significant value to the customers of both Victor Textiles and True Textiles, which will continue to operate as independent business units. The companies will maintain the same commitment to quality, emphasis on unique products, and focus on customer service that have made them industry leaders. Duvaltex management expects the company as well as its customers to benefit from opportunities to create synergies and efficiencies across the organization. The company plans to improve each operation’s competitive positioning by leveraging the individual strengths of each business unit across the organization.
True Textiles is a leading textile mill providing high performance fabrics for applications such as panel, upholstery, acoustic and privacy curtains, to multiple market segments including corporate, healthcare, education, and hospitality. True Textiles is vertically integrated and has expertise in fabric design, yarn production, weaving, weft knitting, finishing and performance enhancements. The company offers an industry leading open line assortment through the Guilford of Maine collection, and unique weft knitted solutions through Teknit.
Victor Textiles is a leading North American-based textile company specializing in sustainable and innovative fabrics designed for the corporate, healthcare, apparel, and specialty markets. The company operates state-of-the-art mills in several Canadian locations, a design studio in New York City, and utilizes service-and-warehouse facilities in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Founded in 1947, family-owned Victor Textiles has a long history of servicing the North American textile and office furniture industries with environmentally responsible fabrics.
“This acquisition brings together two of the industry’s most established and successful companies, recognized for their dedication to innovative product design and commitment to sustainability,” stated Alain Duval, president of Duvaltex Inc. “The True Textiles brands are respected worldwide, and we are looking forward to continuing to maintain that reputation, while also exploring new opportunities for growth and diversification. We believe customers of all of the brands will see the benefits as we move forward to this exciting new chapter for both companies.”
CARY, N.C. — February 15, 2016 — Mark Watte, a Tulare, Calif.-based cotton producer, was elected chairman of Cotton Incorporated at the joint Cotton Board/Cotton Incorporated Board meeting in December, 2015. Watte, who succeeds outgoing chairman B.B. Griffin of North Carolina, has served as a director on the Cotton Incorporated Board of Directors for more than 20 years, and is active in many cotton organizations including the California Cotton Growers and Ginners Association.
“Mark’s experience as a cotton grower and as an officer in numerous cotton organizations gives him a keen understanding of the challenges and opportunities for cotton at this point in the industry’s history,” says J. Berrye Worsham, president and CEO of Cotton Incorporated.
Mark Watte is a partner in George Watte & Sons, a 3,000-acre mixed crop farm in Tulare, California. Since graduating from California Polytechnic State University San Luis Osispo with a degree in Agricultural Business in 1974, Watte has distinguished himself as a leader within the California agricultural community and the U.S. cotton industry.
Currently, Watte shares his knowledge and leadership through participation in local organizations, such as: the Consolidated Peoples Ditch Co; the Friant Water Authority; the Tulare Board of Public Utilities; and the Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District, on which he serves as Vice Chair.
Over the course of his career Watte has received numerous recognitions, including: 2000 Tulare Farmer of the Year (an award shared with his brother and business partner, Brian Watte); 2013 Tulare Man of the Year; Tulare County Agriculturist of the Year; and is a recipient of the 2015 High Cotton Award, presented by Delta Farm Press.
Mark Watte and his wife Joanne have been married for more than 42 years, have three daughters and ten grandchildren.
Watte will serve a two-year term as Cotton Incorporated Chairman.
