Democratic Leader Blasts Administration Policy

The chairman of the House Ways and
Means Committee’s Trade Subcommittee has sharply criticized the Bush administration’s trade
policies with China and says changes will have to take place.

At a Ways and Means Committee meeting August 2, Rep. Sander Levin, D-Mich., said the
administration has failed to deal with “China’s trade distorting policies that have led to a major
imbalance in trade.” He said that China, because of its size, human resources and its “major
combination of individual enterprise and government involvement in the economy,” has become a major
force in the global economy that has resulted in changes “more profound than we expected.”

Levin charged that the administration has failed effectively to use the special safeguard
mechanism Congress included in legislation granting permanent normal trade relations status to
China. He also said the administration has been unwilling to use the World Trade Organization’s
dispute resolution mechanism despite repeated requests from members of Congress that it do so.

He singled out the administration’s go-slow approach to resolving the Chinese currency
manipulation issue as a failure because Treasury department officials are relying on technicalities
to avoid branding China a currency manipulator. He concluded his statement by saying, “For years
there has been a hands off approach to trade policy while some of our trading partners have taken a
gloves off approach.”

Testifying at the same hearing, Auggie Tantillo, executive director of the American
Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition, said, “China’s predatory trade practices are crippling US
manufacturing, and hopefully this hearing is an indication that Congress intends to take prompt
action this fall against those policies.” He called for congressional enactment of legislation to
combat currency manipulation and a measure to offset what he said is a trade disadvantage to US
manufacturers and service providers caused by the imposition and rebating of foreign border
adjustment taxes, mostly in the form of value-added taxes.



August 7, 2007

Keeping An Eye On Demand


T
he volatility of the market of late has caused some yarn spinners to look at long-term
prospects with a somewhat jaundiced eye.

“I would love to be able to look down the road — six, 12, 18 months — and be able to plan
production,” said one noted Georgia specialty ring spinner. “But there are times these days when I
have problems seeing past next week. We started out the year with high expectations, based on the
way the market was running last year. But, so far, most of our expectations have failed to
materialize. Last year, everyone was fairly optimistic. Going into the first quarter of this year,
business was, maybe, okay. Now everybody, especially in the ring-spinning sector, is complaining
about business being soft. I don’t know much about open-end, I hear those guys are pretty busy —
but I don’t know how their volume of business relates to capacity. I just know that, for us, it’s
horrible right now.”

Said another Southeastern spinner: “I’ve been on the road for seven weeks of the past eight
visiting customers. And what I’ve found is that most big retailers expect their business to be down
substantially in the last quarter. And that, I believe, is the key. There is not enough demand on
the retail side for them to consider stocking up. If you look over the past year or so, we’ve been
used to retail growth from quarter to quarter in the high single digits to as high as 10 to 20
percent for some of them. If you look over the last two quarters, it has been very mixed. Minuses
have almost outpaced the pluses, and the pluses, with only a few exceptions, are in the lower
single digits to the mid-single digits. And that, of course, plays in the demand for our textile
products. It is the general uncertainty in economic growth that is now reflected in the order
situation. The stock market is jumping up and down like crazy. One day you’ve got housing numbers
that are bad and everybody kind of buries their heads in the sand. The more you are based on
commodity items, the worse it is. You just can’t compete here in commodity items anymore.”

The prospects of a slower fourth quarter are of less of a concern to some manufacturers than
the possibility of an extended decrease in demand. “I don’t know that I would say demand is
dropping,” said one North Carolina spinner. “But it seems obvious that the growth in demand is
slowing – and that may be a longer-term thing. If you look at the US economy from a historical
perspective, it seems we are near the end of a growth period and are not really certain about what
lies ahead. We are watching the market very closely right now to make sure we are managing our
inventory situation and keeping it in line with our expectations of demand over the next few
months.”

While there are no magic answers to generating business as demand slows, yarn spinners are
almost universally agreed that quick response and enhanced service provide the avenue to continued
growth. “You’ve got to be prepared to go the extra mile,” said an executive of a leading ring
spinner. “You have to provide turnaround times that others can’t or won’t. And you have to be
completely and totally focused on quality. Customers have more choices today about where and how
they buy products than ever before. And while price will always be the biggest driver for many
companies, response, quality and service come a close second. With the constantly changing demands
of the retailer, you can’t leave them hanging with product they can’t sell. Today, more than ever,
it’s about getting products on the shelf and off the shelf as quickly as possible and then doing
the same all over again with a new or differentiated product.”

The question is, should the US economy begin a downturn, is enhanced service and delivery
enough to offset what may become a tendency of retailers and second-tier customers to buy on price
alone?

“I don’t know the answer to that,” said one Georgia spinner. “But I just know that it had
better be, because that’s all we’ve got.”



August 7, 2007

Good News On Costs


C
ontinuing cost containment could well be behind much of the 2007-to-date tolerably good
mill performance. Indeed, with both industry fiber and labor outlays not that much different from
last year’s levels, domestic textile companies are managing to hold their own in today’s
competitive one-world marketplace. Look at fibers first: While there have been some cost advances
over the past year in a few man-mades — most notably polyester — most other man-mades have either
eased a bit or not moved at all.

Not surprisingly then, Uncle Sam’s official man-made producer price index remains pretty much
where it was last summer. Moreover, there is little to suggest any appreciable near-term upward
drift. That’s because of today’s huge man-made fiber capacity glut. Backing this up, the Fiber
Economics Bureau — citing the June 2007 issue of Fiber Organon — notes that the global utilization
rate for these fibers is now hovering at the extremely low 75-percent level.

And another 2.8-percent increase in production potential is anticipated by the end of next
year. Coming next to cotton: True, quotes here have moved higher over the past 12 months — with
some further inching ahead possible this summer, before the new crop is harvested. Nevertheless,
there is little statistical evidence to indicate any significant runup — even with this year’s
reduced US plantings. For one, US cotton stocks — both overall and expressed as a percentage of
usage — are expected to remain well above the levels of recent years through the 2007-08 marketing
year. Also reassuring, the International Cotton Advisory Council’s latest production forecast puts
global ouput in the new marketing year just getting underway at or even slightly above that of the
previous 12-month period.


No Labor Cost Pressure Either

Wages, the other mill cost, haven’t been causing any serious problems for US mills either.
This can best be appreciated by comparing the industry’s current hourly wages with those reported
12 months ago. In the case of basic mills, the pay increase over the past year has only been
something in the order of 3.5 percent. And the comparable wage boosts are even smaller when it
comes to more highly fabricated textile mill products like home furnishings and carpets. Moreover,
those numbers tend to exaggerate the industry’s costs because they are being offset by productivity
gains. Bottom line: Adjust for these efficiency gains, conservatively put at nearly 3 percent per
year, and you end up with basically flat unit labor costs — and that’s the true measure of mill
payroll pressures.




Aug07BFgraph


Overall Costs – Another Perspective

Further confirmation of the lack of any overall cost pressures comes from recent estimates of
combined material and labor cost totals — just released by economic consulting firm Global Insight.
Adjust these cost totals for the modest decline in domestic mill production activity that has
occurred over the 2006-07 period, and resulting material and labor cost outlays — now on a
unit-of-production basis — remain virtually unchanged from last year. And this encouraging trend is
likely to continue, with Global Insight analysts suggesting these costs on a unit basis might even
show a fractional decline in 2008.

In any event, this lack of any major mill cost pressure could be one reason why industry
earnings and margins — while by no means robust — still remain positive and, even more important,
pretty much unchanged from last year’s levels.


The Economy Should Help, Too

Meantime, continuing gross domestic product (GDP) gains could put a floor under apparel
demand and hence overall textile mill operations. To be sure, these GDP increases have slowed down
a bit, but they’ll still be fairly impressive, judging from a recent Wall Street Journal survey of
60 leading business economists. Their prediction: The economy should grow at an annualized rate of
2.6 percent in the July-December period — and at 2.9 percent in 2008. That’s not much lower than
the 3.3-percent rate recorded for all of last year. Combine these projected increases with
continuing advances in worker take-home pay, and it’s almost a sure bet consumer spending totals
will keep rising. More importantly, with auto sales likely to remain on the sluggish side, the new
projections would seem to assure still-strong consumer purchases of apparel and other software
items. Hence, our latest domestic apparel manufacturing estimate sees industry revenues rising to
nearly $38 billion this year — up more than 2 percent from 2006 levels.



August 7, 2007

Huntsman To Acquire DuPont™ Zonyl® Fluorochemical Product Line

The Switzerland-based Textile Effects business of Salt Lake City-based Huntsman Corp. has agreed to
acquire Wilmington, Del.-based DuPont’s global fluorochemical business — comprising its DuPont™
Zonyl® product line for nonwovens applications including automotive, construction, filtration and
medical applications; among others — for an undisclosed price. Zonyl products are used as
repellents for alcohol-, oil- and water-based fluids.

The agreement provides for a short transition period to ensure a smooth changeover, after
which DuPont will supply finished products and intermediates to Huntsman, which will handle all
future business-related activities but will not take over DuPont’s employees or manufacturing
assets. The two companies also agreed to jointly develop new products and technologies for the
nonwovens sector.

“We are delighted with this transaction, as we believe that DuPont’s technology and product
stewardship, with its focus on sustainability, will significantly enhance our product offering in
the technical textile market, which is strategically important for our Textile Effects business,”
said Paul Hulme, president of Huntsman’s Materials and Effects division.


House Approves Special Import Quotas And Payments For Cotton Textile Manufacturers

Farm legislation approved by the
House of Representatives on July 27 contains a provision designed to replace the cotton textile
competitiveness program outlawed in 2005 by the World Trade Organization (WTO) and also permits US
mills to import raw cotton under certain circumstances. The competitiveness program is designed to
assist US mills that are prohibited by law from importing more than roughly one day’s consumption
of raw cotton. As a result, the mills are at a competitive disadvantage when the price they pay for
domestic cotton exceeds the world price.

The legislation, which runs through July 31, 2013, extends a special import quota when the
price for US cotton in a four-week period exceeds the Far East price. It permits importation of one
week’s consumption above the mandatory quota level.

The new system of payments to mills when the domestic price is higher than the world price
provides payments of 4 cents per pound in cash or certificates, but it has a provision that the
funds must be used for “acquisition, construction, or expansion of land, plants, buildings,
equipment, facilities or machinery.” Industry officials believe this approach would not violate WTO
rules.

For further information, mill and merchants may contact Gary Adams, vice president of
economics and policy analysis, at the National Cotton Council (901) 274-9030.



July 31, 2007

Committee Approves Anti-Currency Manipulation Bill

The Senate Finance Committee, by a
vote of 20-1, has approved legislation designed to provide a counter-attack against those countries
that undervalue their currencies in order to gain an advantage in international trade. Acting
against currency manipulation has been high on the agenda of US textile manufacturers who contend
that China’s currency policies amount to as much as a 40-percent trade subsidy. While the bill does
not specifically mention China, that country clearly is the target, but the act could be applied to
other countries as well. Retailers and other importers of textiles and apparel are opposed to this
type of legislation, as are companies that want to do business with the Chinese.

The bill would target the Treasury Secretary to identify “fundamentally misaligned”
currencies and enter into negotiations with the offending countries. If that does not produce
acceptable results, the secretary would be required to take the issue to a World Trade Organization
dispute panel. The legislation also would permit the United States to levy anti-dumping penalties
on imports based on currency manipulation.

As the bill was reported out of committee, the Treasury Department issued a statement saying
it could not support the legislation and it believes that “direct, robust discussions with the
senior Chinese leaders, not legislation, is the best means of achieving progress.” The statement
further said: “Treasury recognizes that members of Congress wish to send a strong message through
this bill and others. Secretary Paulson will be delivering a strong message to President Hu and
others next week in China. It is vital to the health of the global economy, including the US
economy, that China reforms its currency and takes other steps to reduce imbalances.”

Enactment of the bill could be delayed by a jurisdictional dispute in the Senate. The Senate
Banking committee feels it has jurisdiction over the matter and has a bill of its own. The two
committees likely will eventually enter into negotiations that would result in a merger of the two
bills. The overwhelming vote in the Finance Committee is an indication of the strong sentiment to
do something about the currency issue, but it may not be all that easy. President George W. Bush is
strongly opposed to the legislation. His supporters in the Senate could block it with procedural
tactics, and it would require a two-thirds majority to pass it over their objections.



July 31, 2007

ATC Opens New Facility, Doubles Showroom Space

Duquesne, Pa.-based American Textile Co. (ATC) — a manufacturer of such bedding products as pillows
and pillow covers, and mattress pads and covers that offer a range of performance-based treatments
focusing on allergies, stain prevention and protection and waterproof protection — has opened a
55,000-square-foot manufacturing and shipping facility in Salt Lake City.

The company also will move to a new showroom in the home textile building on Fifth Avenue —
double the size of its current showroom — in New York City next month. ATC also recently doubled
the size of its bed pillow operation through the expansion of its Duquesne facility
(See “American Textile Celebrates Expansion,” www.
TextileWorld.com, Feb. 13, 2007)
.



July 31, 2007

Lectra Introduces Kaledo Software For Fashion Design

Paris-based Lectra has developed the Kaledo suite of software solutions targeted to fashion
designers. The new software — which includes Kaledo Collection, Kaledo Print, Kaledo Knit and
Kaledo Weave for designing prints, knits and yarn-dyed woven fabric collections, respectively.

The user-friendly textile software enables fashion designers to produce more designs and
authenticate collections faster by making all necessary data available throughout the design
process. Designs, along with combinations of styles, components and materials are saved
automatically; any subsequent changes to those characteristics are reflected throughout the
collection.

“In a competitive environment, our clients need to strengthen their brand image and increase
their ability to innovate,” said Daniel Harari, CEO, Lectra. “Thirty of our best engineers and
technicians and over 10 million euros have been devoted to developing the new Kaledo range over the
past six years. By making design easier and integrating it into the product life cycle very early
on, we allow our clients to take a great step forward in speeding up their collection development
and strengthening their competitiveness at the same time.”

Kaledo also enables datasharing in real time, enabling more efficient communication amongst
design teams and faster product development cycles, according to Lectra. The software also is
closely linked to Lectra Fashion PLM, allowing collection developers direct access to designers’
data.

“With Kaledo Collection, our teams can free themselves from repetitive, time-consuming tasks
to focus on designing,” said Philippe Cornillot, CEO of France-based PMC Lingerie — the first
company to use the new software in its design office. “Our company’s added value is design. We show
our clients our exclusive designs based on documents developed with Kaledo Collection, and
consequently, we can sell without having to make samples and take orders even before the products
are actually finalized.”



July 31, 2007

TrapTek Receives Patent For Fabric Technology

The US Patent and Trademark Office has issued Patent # 7,247,374 to Longmont, Colo.-based TrapTek
LLC for technology to keep particles active in fibers, films and coatings. The patent is the third
of several patents TrapTek and Dr. Gregory Haggquist, a company founder, have applied for in
connection with fabric technologies the company is developing using natural sources.

TrapTek is using the patented technology in its award-winning Cocona™ branded coatings,
fibers, yarns and fabrics. Cocona fibers are embedded with activated carbon particles derived from
recycled coconut shells to provide evaporative cooling as well as trap ultraviolet light and odors
in the particles’ pore structure. The technology encapsulates the activated carbon during fiber
extrusion to prevent the pores from being filled with polymer. A finishing process removes the
protective layer from the yarn and allows the particles to function as intended.

“This patent recognizes the innovations of Dr. Haggquist, an outstanding scientist who has
uniquely added active particles to increase the performance of fibers, fabrics and films,” said
Brad Poorman, president, TrapTek.

Licensees of Cocona products include more than 40 North American and European brands
including Champion, Cutter and Buck, Dockers, Eddie Bauer, Haggar, Marmot, Oakley and VauDe, among
others.



July 31, 2007

Joan Fabrics Completes Sale Of Assets

Tyngsboro, Mass.-based specialty textiles manufacturer Joan Fabrics Corp. has completed the sale of
company assets as part of the liquidation of its business under the guidance of New York City-based
Carl Marks Advisory Group LLC (CMAG). CMAG took over management of the company in March 2007 and
helped restore it to a state of operational health to enable it to be sold as viable operation.

The company has sold its Circa 1801/Doblin, Home Fabrics and Mastercraft Contract/Guild 360
product lines to Valdese, N.C.-based jacquard upholstery fabric manufacturer Valdese Weavers LLC.
Texel, Joan Fabrics’ Mexico-based operation, along with intellectual property related to the
Mastercraft residential business, have been sold to Joan Fabrics Chairman Elkin McCallum.
Boston-based Gordon Brothers Group LLC has acquired non-operating machinery and equipment, and Fred
Godley of North Carolina has acquired non-operating plants and warehouses in North Carolina. The
Mastercraft residential business was not sold, and its inventory has been sold off separately.

In the case of Circa 1801/Doblin, the deal includes all assets, including design and
manufacturing equipment. The Circa 1801 facility in Connelly Springs, N.C., will continue to house
that operation, and the established management team including John Lenox, Margaret Coffin and Bill
Garner will continue to lead the business. Valdese Weavers will support Circa 1801 with its own
vertical operations and financial resources. Parts of the Home Fabrics business, which was part of
Circa 1801, will be carried forward and merged with the Wesley Mancini by Valdese Weavers brand as
Home Fabrics by Wesley Mancini. Valdese will merge the Mastercraft Contract/Guild 360 business into
the Valdese Weavers Contract brand, with the existing management team led by Blake Millinor. The
manufacturing operation will be housed in the Valdese Weavers and Circa 1801 facilities.

“The swift reinvigoration and sale of Joan Fabrics’ assets was an immense accomplishment. We
are confident the transactions were well targeted and executed with the right buyers,” said Rick
Heller, partner, CMAG. “The US textile industry is experiencing exceptionally difficult times as a
result of much manufacturing moving offshore. To be able to sell Joan Fabrics’ assets in such a
short period of time is a real victory and very good for the company and its stakeholders.”



July 31, 2007

Sponsors