Clearbuilt And Beverly Announce Soft Launch Of Innovative MRP Software Solution For The Textile Industry

ATLANTA, GA — May 5, 2025 — Over the past five years, Clearbuilt, a web application developer for over 30 years, has worked with Beverly to develop a new Material Requirements Planning (MRP) Software, designed specifically for the textile manufacturing industry. Beverly is a 45-year-old American textile manufacturer that includes knitting, dyeing, finishing, cutting and sewing operations. The companies are proud to announce the soft launch of their software to the textile industry.

The software streamlines key processes in textile manufacturing, from production to inventory management to sales support.  Staying relevant in the textile industry requires flexibility and innovation.  The software was developed with this fact in mind.  It is supported by highly skilled U.S.-based engineers that are experienced with the challenges within the industry.

Neal Berry, Clearbuilt CEO

“We’re excited to offer this comprehensive MRP solution to textile manufacturers,” said Neal Berry, CEO at Clearbuilt. “Having collaborated closely with Beverly, we’ve built a software package that not only addresses day-to-day manufacturing needs but is also customizable to grow alongside the needs of businesses in this dynamic industry.”

Key Features of the MRP Software:

  • Real-time Inventory Management: Keep track of raw materials and finished goods for better decision-making.
  • Raw Material Management: Track waste, project material needs, and place timely supply orders.
  • Customizable Dashboards: Tailor reports and AI-driven insights to meet your business’s unique needs.
  • Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with existing systems and workflows for minimal disruption.
  • Comprehensive Support: Dedicated, U.S.-based engineering support with deep knowledge of textile manufacturing challenges.

Posted: May 3, 2025

Source: Clearbuilt

The LYCRA Company Names Melissa Riggs As Chief Marketing Officer

WILMINGTON, Del. — May 1, 2025 — The LYCRA Company, a global developer of sustainable and innovative fiber and technology solutions for the apparel and personal care industries, today announced that Melissa Riggs, director of marketing, North America, has been promoted to the role of chief marketing officer (CMO).

The LYCRA Company has promoted Melissa Riggs, director of marketing, North America, to the role of chief marketing officer.

Riggs brings more than two decades of brand-building experience in consumer packaged goods and the apparel and footwear industries to her new role, including experience with the GORE-TEX brand. Before joining The LYCRA Company in 2022, Riggs spent 11 years at Molson Coors Beverage Company, specializing in partnership marketing and distributor go-to-market planning.

“I am pleased to recognize exceptional talent from within our organization,” said Gary Smith, The LYCRA Company’s CEO. “Melissa’s promotion reflects the importance we place on building upon our company’s unique marketing capability and the value it brings to our customers.”

As CMO of The LYCRA Company, Riggs oversees the planning, development, and execution of brand and marketing initiatives supporting the company’s business objectives and growth strategies.

“I am honored and excited to lead The LYCRA Company’s marketing organization and work with the global leadership team to help the company achieve its goals,” said Riggs. “For the past three years, I’ve had the privilege of collaborating with an incredibly skilled team. Stepping into the CMO role, I look forward to unlocking new ways to invigorate our ingredient brands, elevate our partners, and make our impact felt throughout the value chain.”

Riggs has a master’s degree from Temple University in Philadelphia and a bachelor’s degree from the University of Rhode Island in Kingston. She is based out of The LYCRA Company’s headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, reporting directly to Smith.

Posted: May 2, 2025

Source: The LYCRA Company

Apparel Brand True Classic Secures Strategic Investment From 1686 Partners, Accelerating Global Expansion And Category Growth

LOS ANGELES — May 1, 2025 — True Classic, the apparel brand transforming everyday basics into better-fitting, better-feeling essentials, announced today a growth investment from 1686 Partners, the Luxembourg-based firm known for backing purpose-driven lifestyle brands. The investment marks the company’s first institutional funding round.

True Classic Pima Cotton Tee

This milestone positions True Classic to accelerate its evolution from a breakout menswear success into a global, omnichannel brand serving the entire family—expanding into new categories, markets, and retail experiences.

“This is more than a capital raise—it’s rocket fuel for our mission,” said Ben Yahalom, CEO of True Classic. “We started True Classic to solve a simple problem —better basics at a better price—but it’s grown into something much bigger. With 1686 Partners, we’re scaling with purpose and aiming to redefine how apparel brands connect with people around the world.”

Since launching in 2019, True Classic has served over 5 million customers across 190+ countries, becoming one of the fastest-growing apparel brands in the U.S. The brand’s rise has been fueled by a relentless focus on fit, value, and story, blending digital-first performance with community-driven storytelling. This year, True Classic will expand its product offering beyond menswear by launching women’s and kids’ products in H2—meeting the entire family where they live, work, and play. To date, True Classic has donated over $10 million to causes supporting veterans, homelessness, and underserved communities—underscoring its commitment to impact beyond the bottom line.

Beyond capital, 1686 Partners brings a hands-on partnership model and deep operational expertise across supply chain, logistics, and omnichannel retail—key pillars to support True Classic’s continued growth and international expansion.

This investment underscores True Classic’s commitment to meeting customers wherever they are—online, in-store, and globally—while continuing to elevate the standard for modern wardrobe staples.

Moelis & Company served as the exclusive financial advisor to True Classic in connection with the transaction.

Posted: May 2, 2025

Source: True Classic

PLASTICS: U.S. Economic Growth Slowed In First Quarter, Output Gap Remains Positive

WASHINGTON, D.C. — May 1, 2025  — The U.S. economy slowed in the first quarter. According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis’ advance estimate, real GDP growth declined by 0.3% on an annualized basis.

Perc Pineda, Chief Economist, PLASTICS

Imports—which subtract from GDP—increased sharply by 50.9%, as businesses front-loaded purchases from foreign suppliers in anticipation of potential tariff hikes. Government spending also declined by 1.4%—the first decrease since Q2 2022. At the federal level, spending fell by 5.1%, with defense and non-defense outlays dropping by 8.0% and 1.0%, respectively.

Consumers hold the key

Personal consumption expenditures (PCE) growth moderated to 1.8% in the first quarter. Durable goods consumption declined by 3.4%, reversing the 12.4% gain seen in the fourth quarter of last year. Nondurable goods consumption grew by 2.7%, slightly below the previous quarter’s 3.1% growth. Services consumption rose by 2.4%, down from 3.0% in the preceding quarter. Altogether, a combination of factors—including a prolonged high-interest-rate environment affecting durable goods and the wealth effects of equity market volatility—contributed to more cautious household spending. Whether this trend continues into the second quarter will largely depend on the labor market and inflation outlook. The first quarter ended with a 4.2% unemployment rate and a 2.4% headline CPI inflation rate in March. Real personal disposable income rose 1.7% year-over-year in March.

Output gap remains positive

While first-quarter GDP data supports expectations for moderate economic growth in 2025, it also suggests the economy is gradually reverting to its long-term growth trend. The U.S. output gap—the difference between real GDP and the Congressional Budget Office’s estimate of potential GDP, defined as the maximum sustainable output when resources are used at normal rates—has remained positive since the third quarter of 2021, indicating the economy has been operating above capacity. In Q1 2025, the output gap was 1.2% of potential GDP, down from 1.8% and 1.7% in the third and fourth quarters of last year, respectively.

Sectoral imbalance continued in the first quarter

Despite economic growth last year and in prior years, sectoral imbalances persisted. Finance and technology sectors expanded while manufacturing and housing sectors experienced interest-rate-driven slumps. Equipment investment rebounded sharply, rising by 69.2% after a 30.6% decline in the previous quarter. However, the gains were uneven. Investment in information processing equipment surged by 73.6%, driven by continued growth in the information technology sector. By contrast, investment in industrial equipment declined by 0.9%, marking a second consecutive quarterly drop and underscoring continued weakness in manufacturing activity.

Untapped domestic capacity

A portion of the first-quarter GDP downtick was due to a spike in imports, highlighting underutilized capacity in domestic manufacturing. At the end of the quarter, the U.S. manufacturing capacity utilization rate was 77.2%, while plastics and rubber products manufacturing operated at 71.0%. These figures reflect the ongoing weakness in manufacturing activity, which could benefit from stronger domestic demand. Not knowing whether imports went into consumption—unlikely, given the weaker change in personal consumption expenditures (PCE)—it is likely that imports will be reflected in the change in inventory. An increase in inventory typically increases GDP in the short term. If the rush to import goods—perhaps in anticipation of escalating tariff tensions—is driven by expected future demand, then it is a strong positive signal for the economy. However, if inventories rise because of weak sales, it signals slowing demand.

Looking ahead, the trajectory of the U.S. economy will hinge on evolving conditions in inflation, interest rates, and the labor market. While pockets of strength remain, particularly in technology investment, the slowdown in consumption and persistent sectoral imbalances point to a fragile path forward—one that will require careful navigation by both policymakers and businesses. 

Posted: May 2, 2025

Source: Perc Pineda, PhDChief Economist, The Plastics Industry Association (PLASTICS)

Manufacturing PMI® At 48.7%; April 2025 Manufacturing ISM® Report On Business®: Apparel, Leather & Allied Products And Textile Mills Report Growth

TEMPE, Ariz. — May 1, 2025 — Economic activity in the manufacturing sector contracted in April for the second month in a row, following a two-month expansion preceded by 26 straight months of contraction, say the nation’s supply executives in the latest Manufacturing ISM® Report On Business®.

The report was issued today by Timothy R. Fiore, CPSM, C.P.M., Chair of the Institute for Supply Management® (ISM®) Manufacturing Business Survey Committee:

“The Manufacturing PMI® registered 48.7 percent in April, 0.3 percentage point lower compared to the 49 percent recorded in March. The overall economy continued in expansion for the 60th month after one month of contraction in April 2020. (A Manufacturing PMI® above 42.3 percent, over a period of time, generally indicates an expansion of the overall economy.) The New Orders Index contracted for the third month in a row following a three-month period of expansion; the figure of 47.2 percent is 2 percentage points higher than the 45.2 percent recorded in March. The April reading of the Production Index (44 percent) is 4.3 percentage points lower than March’s figure of 48.3 percent. The index returned to contraction last month after two months of expansion preceded by eight months of contraction. The Prices Index remained in expansion (or ‘increasing’) territory, registering 69.8 percent, up 0.4 percentage point compared to the reading of 69.4 percent in March. The Backlog of Orders Index registered 43.7 percent, down 0.8 percentage point compared to the 44.5 percent recorded in March. The Employment Index registered 46.5 percent, up 1.8 percentage points from March’s figure of 44.7 percent.

“The Supplier Deliveries Index indicated a continued slowing of deliveries, registering 55.2 percent, 1.7 percentage points higher than the 53.5 percent recorded in March. (Supplier Deliveries is the only ISM® Report On Business® index that is inversed; a reading of above 50 percent indicates slower deliveries, which is typical as the economy improves and customer demand increases.) The Inventories Index registered 50.8 percent, down 2.6 percentage points compared to March’s reading of 53.4 percent. The index indicated expansion for a second consecutive month after six months of contraction.

“The New Export Orders Index reading of 43.1 percent is 6.5 percentage points lower than the reading of 49.6 percent registered in March. The Imports Index dropped into contraction in April, registering 47.1 percent, 3 percentage points lower than March’s reading of 50.1 percent.”

Fiore continues, “In April, U.S. manufacturing activity slipped marginally further into contraction after expanding only marginally in February. Demand and output weakened while input strengthened further, conditions that are not considered positive for economic growth. Indications that demand weakened include the (1) New Orders Index continuing in contraction territory, (2) New Export Orders Index dropping sharply further into contraction, (3) Backlog of Orders Index contracting at a faster rate and (4) Customers’ Inventories Index remaining in ‘too low’ territory. Output (measured by the Production and Employment indexes) also weakened. Factory output (production) contracted further in April, indicating that panelists’ companies are continuing to revise production plans downward in the face of economic headwinds. The Employment Index ticked up but remained in contraction, as panelists’ companies continued to release workers. Companies generally opted for layoffs because they are quicker to implement than attrition. Inputs are defined as supplier deliveries, inventories, prices and imports. Except for Imports, the other indexes indicated expansion. Inventory growth is not a positive sign when demand is moving in the opposite direction; the recent expansion is considered a temporary move to avoid tariffs, and levels will decline when such trade issues are resolved. Supplier delivery performance reflects this pull-forward activity and delays in clearing goods through ports of entry.

“Demand and production retreated and destaffing continued, as panelists’ companies responded to an unknown economic environment. Prices growth accelerated slightly due to tariffs, causing new order placement backlogs, supplier delivery slowdowns and manufacturing inventory growth. Forty-one percent of manufacturing gross domestic product (GDP) contracted in April, down from 46 percent in March. The share of manufacturing sector GDP registering a composite PMI® calculation at or below 45 percent (a good barometer of overall manufacturing weakness) was 18 percent in April, an 11-percentage point increase compared to the 7 percent reported in March. Of the six largest manufacturing industries, four (Petroleum & Coal Products; Computer & Electronic Products; Machinery; and Chemical Products) expanded in April, one more as compared to March,” says Fiore.

The 11 manufacturing industries reporting growth in April — listed in order — are: Apparel, Leather & Allied Products; Petroleum & Coal Products; Plastics & Rubber Products; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Textile Mills; Computer & Electronic Products; Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; Machinery; Chemical Products; and Primary Metals. The six industries reporting contraction in April, in order, are: Wood Products; Furniture & Related Products; Paper Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Transportation Equipment; and Fabricated Metal Products.

WHAT RESPONDENTS ARE SAYING

  • “Uncertainty over tariffs is providing a big challenge from both Tier-1 suppliers we will have to pay tariffs on directly and Tier-2 suppliers that will try to pass tariffs through to us in the form of price increases and tariff surcharges.” [Chemical Products]
  • “Tariffs impacting operations — specifically, delayed border crossings and duties calculations that are complex and not completely understood. As a result, we are potentially overpaying duties. Unsure of potential drawbacks. Implementation of tariffs and their application is sudden and abrupt. The business is taking countermeasures.” [Transportation Equipment]
  • “Business climate is apprehensive, and with tariff costs implemented, all inbound Chinese shipments are on hold. It is not feasible for our business or customers to sustain the pricing required to provide an acceptable margin.” [Computer & Electronic Products]
  • “The most important topic is tariffs. Risks include margin erosion due to rising operational costs and freight delays disrupting delivery timelines. Supplier relationships are strained by pain-share negotiations, and competitors are gaining share by importing from lower-tariff regions.” [Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products]
  • “Tariff whiplash is causing us major issues with customers. The two issues we are seeing: (1) customers are holding back orders to understand what is happening with tariffs on their products or (2) they are forcing us to accept the tariffs, which causes us to ‘no quote’ the job as we cannot take on that type of risk for an order.” [Machinery]
  • “There is a lot of concern about the inflationary impacts from tariffs in our industry. Domestic producers are charging more for everything because they can.” [Fabricated Metal Products]
  • “Tariff trade wars are incredibly volatile, quickly changing, and disrupting a ton of our current work. We are 90 percent sourced out of China, and the cost models keep changing every week. We are flying to visit suppliers in a few weeks to negotiate current terms and pricing, as well as develop more long-term, strategic plans to reduce risk in the region.” [Apparel, Leather & Allied Products]
  • “Demand is slightly lower than plan, but it has been steady amid tariff concerns. Significant time has been spent quantifying the impact of changing tariff rates. Our costs will increase, and we are discussing how to share that impact across suppliers and customers.” [Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components]
  • “The recently imposed 145-percent tariff rate on Chinese imports is significantly affecting our 2025 profitability. Due to the complexity of our parts and the lack of alternate sources, we are unable to find any alternate suppliers — especially at a reasonable cost — to our current Chinese sources. Incoming orders have slowed due to market volatility and uncertainty.” [Miscellaneous Manufacturing]
  • “Strategic procurement and the supply chain are paralyzed in a world that changes daily due to tariffs.” [Nonmetallic Mineral Products]
MANUFACTURING AT A GLANCE
April 2025
Index Series
Index

Apr

Series
Index

Mar

Percentage

Point

Change

Direction Rate of
Change
Trend*
(Months)
Manufacturing PMI® 48.7 49.0 -0.3 Contracting Faster 2
New Orders 47.2 45.2 +2.0 Contracting Slower 3
Production 44.0 48.3 -4.3 Contracting Faster 2
Employment 46.5 44.7 +1.8 Contracting Slower 3
Supplier Deliveries 55.2 53.5 +1.7 Slowing Faster 5
Inventories 50.8 53.4 -2.6 Growing Slower 2
Customers’ Inventories 46.2 46.8 -0.6 Too Low Faster 7
Prices 69.8 69.4 +0.4 Increasing Faster 7
Backlog of Orders 43.7 44.5 -0.8 Contracting Faster 31
New Export Orders 43.1 49.6 -6.5 Contracting Faster 2
Imports 47.1 50.1 -3.0 Contracting From Growing 1
OVERALL ECONOMY Growing Slower 60
Manufacturing Sector Contracting Faster 2

Manufacturing ISM® Report On Business® data is seasonally adjusted for the New Orders, Production, Employment and Inventories indexes.
*Number of months moving in current direction.

COMMODITIES REPORTED UP/DOWN IN PRICE AND IN SHORT SUPPLY

Commodities Up in Price
Aluminum (17); Aluminum Products (2); Brass (2); Construction Materials; Cooking Oils; Copper (3);Corrugated Boxes (2); Critical Minerals (2); Electrical Components (3); Electronic Components (3); Maintenance, Repair, and Operations (MRO) Supplies; Packaging (2); Personal Protective Equipment (PPE); Plastic Resin (3); Power Train Products; Road Freight; Steel (3); Steel — Hot Rolled (3); Steel — Stainless (2); and Steel Products (2).

Commodities Down in Price
Gasoline and Diesel Fuel; and Natural Gas (2).

Commodities in Short Supply
Electronic Components (2); Plastic Resin; and Semiconductors.

Note: The number of consecutive months the commodity is listed is indicated after each item.

APRIL 2025 MANUFACTURING INDEX SUMMARIES

Manufacturing PMI®
 
The U.S. manufacturing sector contracted in April for the second consecutive month after two months of expansion preceded by 26 months of contraction. The Manufacturing PMI® registered 48.7 percent, 0.3 percentage point lower compared to the 49 percent reported in March. “After reversing its recent momentum in March, the Manufacturing PMI® again registered below its reading in December. Of the five subindexes that directly factor into the Manufacturing PMI®, two (Supplier Deliveries and Inventories) were in expansion territory, the same as last month. Slower supplier deliveries and slightly expanded inventories in April are not considered positives for the economy: Both conditions figure to be temporary and are driven by tariff concerns, either delaying buyer/seller negotiations or advancing material deliveries that will be reversed after tariffs are deployed, leading to a drawdown of manufacturing inventory. Although the Employment and New Orders indexes recovered somewhat, they remained in contraction. Of the six biggest manufacturing industries, four (Petroleum & Coal Products; Computer & Electronic Products; Machinery; and Chemical Products) registered growth,” says Fiore. A reading above 50 percent indicates that the manufacturing sector is generally expanding; below 50 percent indicates that it is generally contracting.

A Manufacturing PMI® above 42.3 percent, over a period of time, generally indicates an expansion of the overall economy. Therefore, the April Manufacturing PMI® indicates the overall economy grew for the 60th straight month after last contracting in April 2020. “The past relationship between the Manufacturing PMI® and the overall economy indicates that the April reading (48.7 percent) corresponds to a change of plus-1.8 percent in real gross domestic product (GDP) on an annualized basis,” says Fiore.

THE LAST 12 MONTHS

Month Manufacturing
PMI®
Month Manufacturing
PMI®
Apr 2025 48.7 Oct 2024 46.9
Mar 2025 49.0 Sep 2024 47.5
Feb 2025 50.3 Aug 2024 47.5
Jan 2025 50.9 Jul 2024 47.0
Dec 2024 49.2 Jun 2024 48.3
Nov 2024 48.4 May 2024 48.5
Average for 12 months – 48.5

High – 50.9

Low – 46.9

New Orders
ISM®‘s New Orders Index contracted in April for the third consecutive month after three consecutive months of expansion, registering 47.2 percent, an increase of 2 percentage points compared to March’s figure of 45.2 percent. This reading is below the 12-month moving average (48.5 percent) for the New Orders Index, which hasn’t indicated consistent growth since a 24-month streak of expansion ended in May 2022. “Of the six largest manufacturing sectors, four (Petroleum & Coal Products; Machinery; Computer & Electronic Products; and Chemical Products) reported increased new orders. Two (Transportation Equipment; and Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products) reported declines. The percentages reporting ‘higher’ and ‘lower’ new orders both increased in April, an unusual sign and indication of a rare transition. Panelists noted a weakening level of demand performance, with a 1-to-1 ratio of positive comments versus those expressing concern about near-term demand. Overall, new orders continue to slow, as discussions about who will pay for potential tariff costs are the prime topic of negotiations between buyers and sellers. New orders are also struggling due to a lack of new orders from overseas customers,” says Fiore. A New Orders Index above 52.1 percent, over time, is generally consistent with an increase in the Census Bureau’s series on manufacturing orders (in constant 2000 dollars).

The eight manufacturing industries that reported growth in new orders in April, in order, are: Apparel, Leather & Allied Products; Petroleum & Coal Products; Plastics & Rubber Products; Machinery; Primary Metals; Computer & Electronic Products; Fabricated Metal Products; and Chemical Products. The six industries reporting a decline in new orders in April, in order, are: Wood Products; Paper Products; Furniture & Related Products; Transportation Equipment; Nonmetallic Mineral Products; and Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products.

New Orders %Higher %Same %Lower Net Index
Apr 2025 28.1 45.2 26.7 +1.4 47.2
Mar 2025 19.9 56.8 23.3 -3.4 45.2
Feb 2025 20.3 62.4 17.3 +3.0 48.6
Jan 2025 26.3 53.7 20.0 +6.3 55.1

Production
The Production Index dropped further into contraction territory in April, registering 44 percent, 4.3 percentage points lower than the March reading of 48.3 percent. Prior to the readings of expansion in January and February, the index was in contraction territory for eight consecutive months, with the previous reading above 50 percent in April 2024 (50.7 percent). Of the six largest manufacturing sectors, two (Computer & Electronic Products; and Machinery) reported increased production. “Production levels in April showed a significant decrease for the second time in 2025, as order books remain weak and new orders continue to decline. Petroleum & Coal Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; and Transportation Equipment led the decline in output, causing head-count reductions at factories. Lack of capital investment due to business-climate uncertainty is also having a significant impact on production plans and output,” says Fiore. An index above 52.1 percent, over time, is generally consistent with an increase in the Federal Reserve Board’s Industrial Production figures.

The seven industries reporting growth in production during the month of April — in the following order — are: Textile Mills; Plastics & Rubber Products; Fabricated Metal Products; Computer & Electronic Products; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; Machinery; and Primary Metals. The eight industries reporting a decrease in production in April, in order, are: Furniture & Related Products; Wood Products; Petroleum & Coal Products; Paper Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Transportation Equipment; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; and Chemical Products.

Production %Higher %Same %Lower Net Index
Apr 2025 19.8 56.0 24.2 -4.4 44.0
Mar 2025 21.0 58.1 20.9 +0.1 48.3
Feb 2025 16.5 68.9 14.6 +1.9 50.7
Jan 2025 19.4 62.1 18.5 +0.9 52.5

Employment
ISM®‘s Employment Index registered 46.5 percent in April, 1.8 percentage points higher than March’s reading of 44.7 percent. “The index posted its third consecutive month of contraction after expanding in January, with seven straight months of contraction before that. Since May 2022, the Employment Index has contracted in 29 of 36 months. Of the six big manufacturing sectors, three (Petroleum & Coal Products; Transportation Equipment; and Computer & Electronic Products) reported expanded employment in April. Respondents’ companies continue to reduce head counts through layoffs, attrition and hiring freezes; an approximate 1-to-1 ratio of hiring versus staff-reduction comments reflects an acceleration of head-count reductions due to the uncertain near- to mid-term demand. Layoffs were the primary tools used, an indication that head-count reduction is becoming more urgent,” says Fiore. An Employment Index above 50.3 percent, over time, is generally consistent with an increase in the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data on manufacturing employment.

Of the 18 manufacturing industries, the five industries reporting employment growth in April are: Apparel, Leather & Allied Products; Petroleum & Coal Products; Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Transportation Equipment; and Computer & Electronic Products. The eight industries reporting a decrease in employment in April, in the following order, are: Furniture & Related Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Fabricated Metal Products; Plastics & Rubber Products; Primary Metals; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; Chemical Products; and Machinery.

Employment %Higher %Same %Lower Net Index
Apr 2025 13.1 70.7 16.2 -3.1 46.5
Mar 2025 8.3 73.7 18.0 -9.7 44.7
Feb 2025 12.0 70.9 17.1 -5.1 47.6
Jan 2025 11.7 75.1 13.2 -1.5 50.3

Supplier Deliveries
Delivery performance of suppliers to manufacturing organizations was slower for a fifth straight month in April, with the Supplier Deliveries Index registering 55.2 percent, a 1.7-percentage point increase compared to the reading of 53.5 percent reported in March. This continued expansion follows a contraction (which indicates faster delivery performance) in November, preceded by four consecutive months of slower deliveries, with four straight months of faster deliveries before that. After a reading of 52.4 percent in September 2022, the index went into contraction territory the following month and remained there for 20 out of 21 months, with February 2024 the exception. Of the six big industries, four (Petroleum & Coal Products; Transportation Equipment; Computer & Electronic Products; and Chemical Products) reported slower supplier deliveries in April. “Deliveries continued to be marginally strained as (1) suppliers struggled to meet accelerated delivery requests from panelists’ companies, (2) materials are delayed in processing at ports of entry and (3) suppliers and panelists’ companies negotiate who pays for applied tariffs,” says Fiore. A reading below 50 percent indicates faster deliveries, while a reading above 50 percent indicates slower deliveries.

The 10 manufacturing industries reporting slower supplier deliveries in April — in the following order — are: Textile Mills; Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Petroleum & Coal Products; Transportation Equipment; Furniture & Related Products; Paper Products; Computer & Electronic Products; Chemical Products; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; and Fabricated Metal Products. The only industry reporting faster supplier deliveries in April is Machinery. Seven industries reported no change in supplier delivery behavior in April as compared to March.

Supplier Deliveries %Slower %Same %Faster Net Index
Apr 2025 16.6 77.2 6.2 +10.4 55.2
Mar 2025 13.4 80.2 6.4 +7.0 53.5
Feb 2025 14.9 79.1 6.0 +8.9 54.5
Jan 2025 7.8 86.2 6.0 +1.8 50.9

Inventories
The Inventories Index registered 50.8 percent in April, down 2.6 percentage points compared to the reading of 53.4 percent reported in March. Although the Inventories Index ‘gave back’ 2.6 percentage points of the 7.5 percentage points it gained in February and March, the last two readings have been the index’s highest since December 2022 (51.4 percent). Prior to March, the last time the Inventories Index was above 50 percent was in August (50.2 percent). Of the six big industries, two (Petroleum & Coal Products; and Chemical Products) grew input inventories in April. “Manufacturing inventories expanded in April, as panelists’ companies continue to pull forward (advance) deliveries of materials in an attempt to minimize the financial impacts of potential tariffs,” says Fiore. An Inventories Index greater than 44.5 percent, over time, is generally consistent with expansion in the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) figures on overall manufacturing inventories (in chained 2000 dollars).

Of 18 manufacturing industries, the five industries reporting higher inventories in April are: Petroleum & Coal Products; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Plastics & Rubber Products; Chemical Products; and Primary Metals. The eight industries reporting lower inventories in April — listed in order — are: Paper Products; Textile Mills; Wood Products; Furniture & Related Products; Fabricated Metal Products; Transportation Equipment; Machinery; and Computer & Electronic Products.

Inventories %Higher %Same %Lower Net Index
Apr 2025 20.8 59.2 20.0 +0.8 50.8
Mar 2025 21.5 65.7 12.8 +8.7 53.4
Feb 2025 14.6 72.4 13.0 +1.6 49.9
Jan 2025 12.2 67.4 20.4 -8.2 45.9

Customers’ Inventories
ISM®‘s Customers’ Inventories Index registered a reading of 46.2 percent in April, a decrease of 0.6 percentage point compared to the reading of 46.8 percent in March. “Customers’ inventory levels in April continued to contract and moved slightly further from ‘about right’ territory. (For more information about the Customers’ Inventories Index, see the ‘Data and Method of Presentation’ section below.) Panelists are reporting that the amounts of their companies’ products in their customers’ inventories suggest a demand level that remains positive for future production,” says Fiore.

The two industries reporting customers’ inventories as too high in April are: Plastics & Rubber Products; and Computer & Electronic Products. The 10 industries reporting customers’ inventories as too low in April, in order, are: Furniture & Related Products; Wood Products; Primary Metals; Transportation Equipment; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Fabricated Metal Products; Machinery; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; and Chemical Products. Six industries reported no change in customers’ inventories in April as compared to March.

Customers’
Inventories
%
Reporting
%Too
High
%About
Right
%Too
Low
 

Net

 

Index

Apr 2025 76 11.1 70.2 18.7 -7.6 46.2
Mar 2025 77 11.8 70.0 18.2 -6.4 46.8
Feb 2025 77 8.0 74.6 17.4 -9.4 45.3
Jan 2025 77 9.0 75.4 15.6 -6.6 46.7

Prices
The ISM® Prices Index registered 69.8 percent in April, increasing 0.4 percentage point compared to the March reading of 69.4 percent, indicating raw materials prices increased for the seventh straight month after a decrease in September. The Prices Index has increased 15 percentage points over the past six months to record its highest reading since June 2022 (78.5 percent). Of the six largest manufacturing industries, five — Machinery; Chemical Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Computer & Electronic Products; and Transportation Equipment — reported price increases in April. “The Prices Index indicated increasing prices in April for the seventh consecutive month, driven by increases in steel and aluminum prices impacting the entire value chain, as well as the general 10-percent tariff applied to many imported goods. Forty-nine percent of companies reported higher prices in April, compared to 46 percent in March. This share has consistently increased over the past six months, from a low of 12.2 percent in November,” says Fiore. A Prices Index above 52.8 percent, over time, is generally consistent with an increase in the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Producer Price Index for Intermediate Materials.

In April, the 15 industries that reported paying increased prices for raw materials, in order, are: Textile Mills; Furniture & Related Products; Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Machinery; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; Fabricated Metal Products; Chemical Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Primary Metals; Paper Products; Computer & Electronic Products; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Transportation Equipment; Wood Products; and Plastics & Rubber Products. No industries reported paying decreased prices for raw materials in April.

 

Prices

%Higher %Same %Lower Net Index
Apr 2025 49.2 41.1 9.7 +39.5 69.8
Mar 2025 46.0 46.7 7.3 +38.7 69.4
Feb 2025 31.4 61.9 6.7 +24.7 62.4
Jan 2025 20.7 68.3 11.0 +9.7 54.9

Backlog of Orders
ISM®‘s Backlog of Orders Index registered 43.7 percent, a decrease of 0.8 percentage point compared to the March reading of 44.5 percent, indicating order backlogs contracted for the 31st consecutive month after a 27-month period of expansion. Of the six largest manufacturing industries, only one (Computer & Electronic Products) reported expansion in order backlogs in April. “Given the state of weak new orders and now reduced production output in key industries, the hoped-for return of expanding backlogs continues to be delayed until trade issues and other geopolitical tensions recede,” says Fiore.

Of the 18 manufacturing industries, five reported growth in order backlogs in April: Nonmetallic Mineral Products; Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Primary Metals; Miscellaneous Manufacturing; and Computer & Electronic Products. The 11 industries reporting lower backlogs in April — in the following order — are: Apparel, Leather & Allied Products; Paper Products; Wood Products; Petroleum & Coal Products; Plastics & Rubber Products; Furniture & Related Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Chemical Products; Transportation Equipment; Fabricated Metal Products; and Machinery.

Backlog of
Orders
%
Reporting
 

%Higher

 

%Same

 

%Lower

 

Net

 

Index

Apr 2025 92 15.1 57.2 27.7 -12.6 43.7
Mar 2025 91 15.4 58.2 26.4 -11.0 44.5
Feb 2025 92 14.0 65.5 20.5 -6.5 46.8
Jan 2025 93 12.6 64.6 22.8 -10.2 44.9

New Export Orders
ISM®‘s New Export Orders Index contracted for the second month in a row in April after expanding for two consecutive months, registering 43.1 percent in April, down from March’s reading of 49.6 percent. This 6.5 percentage point decrease is the largest since April 2020, when the index dropped 11.3 percentage points. “The rate of decrease for the New Export Orders Index is the fastest since the coronavirus pandemic, and excluding COVID-19, the reading is the lowest since the Great Recession (42.9 percent in April 2009). Export orders contracted for the second consecutive month after growing in January and February. This brief period of expansion followed an ‘unchanged’ status (a reading of 50 percent), preceded by six straight months of contraction. New export orders contracted sharply due to the combination of slow overseas growth as well as the application of counter tariffs applied to a multitude of U.S. manufactured products,” says Fiore.

Of the 18 manufacturing industries, none reported growth in new export orders in April. The 12 industries reporting a decrease in new export orders in April — in the following order — are: Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components; Textile Mills; Paper Products; Furniture & Related Products; Transportation Equipment; Fabricated Metal Products; Primary Metals; Machinery; Chemical Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Computer & Electronic Products; and Miscellaneous Manufacturing. Six industries reported no change in new export orders in April as compared to March.

New Export
Orders
%
Reporting
 

%Higher

 

%Same

 

%Lower

 

Net

 

Index

Apr 2025 74 8.7 68.8 22.5 -13.8 43.1
Mar 2025 73 12.1 74.9 13.0 -0.9 49.6
Feb 2025 73 12.9 77.0 10.1 +2.8 51.4
Jan 2025 74 12.0 80.8 7.2 +4.8 52.4

Imports
ISM®‘s Imports Index contracted in April after expanding for three straight months. The April reading of 47.1 percent is 3 percentage points lower than the reading of 50.1 percent reported in March. Before expanding in January, the index contracted for seven months in a row, preceded by five consecutive months of expansion, with 14 straight months of contraction prior to that. “Imports contracted as demand has reduced the need to maintain the same level of imports compared to prior months,” says Fiore.

The six industries reporting an increase in import volumes in April, in order, are: Apparel, Leather & Allied Products; Wood Products; Textile Mills; Primary Metals; Plastics & Rubber Products; and Miscellaneous Manufacturing. The seven industries that reported lower volumes of imports in April — in the following order — are: Petroleum & Coal Products; Furniture & Related Products; Machinery; Fabricated Metal Products; Chemical Products; Transportation Equipment; and Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components.

Imports %
Reporting
 

%Higher

 

%Same

 

%Lower

 

Net

 

Index

Apr 2025 82 15.4 63.4 21.2 -5.8 47.1
Mar 2025 86 16.5 67.1 16.4 +0.1 50.1
Feb 2025 85 16.4 72.3 11.3 +5.1 52.6
Jan 2025 85 11.6 78.9 9.5 +2.1 51.1

The Supplier Deliveries, Customers’ Inventories, Prices, Backlog of Orders, New Export Orders, and Imports indexes do not meet the accepted criteria for seasonal adjustments.

Buying Policy
The average commitment lead time for Capital Expenditures in April was 169 days, an increase of four days compared to March. The average lead time in April for Production Materials was 84 days, an increase of four days compared to March. The average lead time for Maintenance, Repair and Operating (MRO) Supplies was 46 days, a decrease of one day compared to March.

Percent Reporting
Capital
Expenditures
Hand-to-
Mouth
30 Days 60 Days 90 Days 6 Months 1 Year+ Average
Days
Apr 2025 16 4 11 14 28 27 169
Mar 2025 17 3 10 15 30 25 165
Feb 2025 17 4 9 14 30 26 168
Jan 2025 17 4 8 15 30 26 168
Percent Reporting  
Production
Materials
Hand-to-
Mouth
30 Days 60 Days 90 Days 6 Months 1 Year+ Average
Days
 
Apr 2025 10 24 25 26 9 6 84  
Mar 2025 8 24 27 28 9 4 80  
Feb 2025 8 22 28 28 8 6 85  
Jan 2025 6 25 29 26 9 5 83  

 

Percent Reporting
MRO Supplies Hand-to-
Mouth
30 Days 60 Days 90 Days 6 Months 1 Year+ Average
Days
Apr 2025 31 33 18 12 5 1 46
Mar 2025 30 33 20 10 6 1 47
Feb 2025 29 37 16 13 4 1 45
Jan 2025 29 34 19 11 6 1 47

 

 

Posted: May 2, 2025

Source: Institute for Supply Management

U.S. Textile Industry Hails Significant Step By Trump Administration As De Minimis Loophole Closes For Chinese Imports

WASHINGTON, D.C. — May 1, 2025 — The National Council of Textile Organizations (NCTO), representing the full spectrum of U.S. textiles from fiber, yarn and fabrics to finished sewn products, issued the following statements from NCTO President and CEO Kim Glas and several U.S. textile executives in support of President Trump’s order closing de minimis for China, effective May 2.

Kim Glas , National Council of Textile Organizations (NCTO) President and CEO:

“We are grateful to President Trump and his administration for closing the destructive de minimis loophole that has allowed unsafe and illegal Chinese goods—including goods made with forced labor—to flood the U.S. market duty-free and largely unchecked for years.

“This loophole, largely exploited by Chinese e-commerce giants and others to skirt U.S. tariffs, regulations and laws, has contributed to the closure of 28 textile mills in the past 22 months.

“The U.S. textile industry is a critical and strategic sector, supplying more than 8,000 products to the U.S. military, as well as industrial and commercial markets, while supporting local communities across country, and employing 471,000 workers nationwide.

“Today’s action by the administration is an important step forward to help rebalance the playing field for American manufacturers, preserve good-paying American manufacturing jobs, spur more investment and innovation in manufacturing facilities here at home, and close the backdoor to China once and for all.

“We urge the administration and Congress to move swiftly to end de minimis for commercial shipments from all countries to prevent circumvention and to make sure Made in China products cannot enter the United States through third countries. The U.S. textile industry stands ready to assist the administration as it continues its work to end the de minimis exemption and implement this critical provision.”

 

Anderson Warlick, Chairman and CEO of Parkdale Mills:

“The de minimis loophole has impacted our businesses and our workforce significantly. Roughly half of de minimis shipments contain textile and apparel products which get an unfair competitive advantage at our expense. Illegal products like fentanyl and products made with Uyghur forced labor come into the United States under the de minimis exemption, causing economic damage and impacting the lives of many Americans.

“I am pleased to see President Trump take action to eliminate de minimis for products from China, and I encourage the administration to end de minimis for imports from all countries so we textile manufacturers can compete on a more level playing field.”

Amy Bircher Bruyn, CEO & Founder of MMI Textiles:

“The de minimis loophole has wreaked havoc on the U.S. textile industry by enabling duty-free access for massive volumes of fast fashion imports, largely from China. This policy undermines American manufacturers who play a critical role in our national security and industrial resilience.

“At MMI Textiles, we employ 39 direct team members and support an additional 21 indirect workers — including a printer of camouflage patterns who operates exclusively within our NC facility, summer interns who represent the next generation of textile leaders, and specialized industry consultants. More broadly, through our robust contract manufacturing network, we directly support hundreds of jobs across the U.S. supply chain. Our company is a catalyst for employment and innovation in domestic textiles, producing essential components for U.S. military and law enforcement applications.

“The U.S. textile industry is vital to our nation’s industrial base. We supply the U.S. military, and during the COVID-19 pandemic, our industry pivoted rapidly to manufacture lifesaving PPE for frontline workers. Despite these contributions, the current de minimis threshold has created an unfair advantage for foreign competitors, particularly China, by allowing them to bypass duties and flood the market with underpriced goods — at the direct expense of American jobs.

“I am encouraged by President Trump’s commitment to ending de minimis eligibility for Chinese imports. I urge the administration to move swiftly to eliminate this loophole for all imports and restore a level playing field that protects U.S. manufacturing, jobs, and national security.”

Ron Sytz, CEO of Beverly Knits:

“I am truly thankful to President Trump for closing the de minimis loophole for Chinese imports. This loophole has been devastating to my family’s 44-year-old textile manufacturing business in Gastonia, North Carolina, forcing us to lay off 175 workers and significantly reduce capacity in our plants. We can’t compete against subsidized imports from China that enter the U.S. duty free through the de minimis loophole. With the administration’s action, our company which provides hundreds of jobs and supports our community and the U.S. economy, will once again have a level playing field that will allow us to expand, invest and hire more associates here in the United States.”

Posted: May 1, 2025

Source: The National Council of Textile Organizations (NCTO)

BW Converting To Showcase Sustainable Finishing Innovations At Techtextil North America 

GREEN BAY, Wis.— April 30, 2025 — Under its Baldwin brand, BW Converting will partner with Fi-Tech, Inc. at Techtextil North America to demonstrate its TexCoat™ G4 precision spray finishing system, an advanced, sustainable solution designed to reduce chemical waste, minimize water usage and cut energy consumption in textile manufacturing.

Held May 6-8 in Atlanta, Techtextil North America is the premier event for technical textiles and nonwovens in the United States. BW Converting will be present in the Fi-Tech booth A3207 to connect with textile professionals seeking to streamline operations while improving finishing quality and sustainability outcomes.

Rick Stanford, VP global business development at Baldwin

“We’re excited to bring the TexCoat G4 system to a North American audience alongside our valued partner Fi-Tech,” said Rick Stanford, Vice President of Global Business Development, Textiles, BW Converting. “This non-contact precision spray technology helps mills and finishers meet both environmental and performance goals by eliminating chemistry waste and enabling faster, more consistent production.”

The TexCoat G4 applies chemistry with pinpoint accuracy — on one or both sides of the fabric — with no contamination, overspray or dilution. By eliminating pad baths and reducing the frequency of changeovers, the system significantly improves operational efficiency.

Also featured at Techtextil North America will be BW Converting’s Baldwin Plasma Pure surface modification technology. Plasma Pure boosts adhesion and uptake in dyeing, coating and laminating processes by optimizing surface energy at the molecular level, without the need for added chemicals.

To learn more about Baldwin’s textile solutions and BW Converting’s full portfolio, visit bwconverting.com or stop by the Fi-Tech booth A3207 at Techtextil North America 2025.

Posted: May 1, 2025

Source: BW Converting / Barry-Wehmiller

KBR Selected As Key Commercialization Partner For Samsara Eco’s First-Of-A-Kind Enzymatic Recycling Plant

CANBERRA, Australia— April 30, 2025 — KBR announced today it will support biotech innovator, Samsara Eco, to design its first-of-a-kind plastics and textile enzymatic recycling plant, due for completion in early 2028.

Samsara Eco’s enzymatic recycling technology aims to create a continuous recycling loop for some of the most common types of plastic and synthetic fibre – materials that have traditionally been difficult or impossible to recycle. Powered by Samsara Eco’s proprietary AI platform, the company’s patented enzymes break down plastic to its original building blocks (monomers) which aim to allow plastics to be continuously remanufactured into new products without degradation in quality and with a low carbon footprint.

Unlike other recycling methods, Samsara Eco’s technology has demonstrated the recycling of notoriously difficult plastics, including nylon 6,6 and mixed fibres, as well as colored and dyed fabric blends. This breakthrough technology is expected to be critical towards achieving the goal of creating a circular loop for all plastics recycling, helping companies utilise resources and divert waste otherwise destined for landfills.

Under the terms of the agreement, KBR will perform a pre-FEED (front-end engineering design) of the project by the end of Q2 2025. KBR’s technical and commercial experts will then deliver a FEED engineering package for the process design to build a 20,000 metric tons per year commercial facility for nylon 6,6.

“KBR is uniquely equipped to deliver world-class solutions that help our customers bring sustainable technology to market, and we are thrilled to support Samsara Eco on this unique opportunity,” said Jay Ibrahim, President, KBR Sustainable Technology Solutions. “With this award, KBR continues to solidify our commitment to sustainability and technological innovation.”

Paul Riley, Founder and CEO of Samsara Eco commented, “We are charging full speed ahead to deliver our first-of-a-kind plant to fuel a circular economy and support our brand partners’ ambition to create more circular products from low-carbon recycled materials. KBR brings unmatched engineering expertise. This will ensure we can design and build our facility with speed and precision. We’re proud to have KBR in our corner, helping bring our technology to industrial scale.”

Samsara Eco is already working with leading brands including lululemon to swap virgin materials for recycled materials. Last year, it debuted the world’s first enzymatically recycled nylon 6,6 product. It also launched the first product made from enzymatically recycled polyester, creating lululemon’s limited edition Packable Anorak jacket.

At KBR, a sustainable future begins now.

Posted: May 1, 2025

Source: KBR

Dilo Systems GmbH And Kansan Group Partnership Announcement

MIAMI, Fla. — April 29, 2025 — Dilo Systems GmbH, a Germany-based manufacturer specializing in complete nonwoven lines, and Kansan Group, a Turkish manufacturer specializing in nonwoven converting lines, end-of-line solutions, and Wetlaid Nonwoven machinery, have signed a strategic partnership agreement to supply custom nonwoven lines. As part of this partnership, comprehensive solutions will be offered by integrating fiber preparation and carding equipment, wetlaid, hydroentanglement and needling lines, as well as converting and end-of-line equipment. Engineering work will be carried out by Dilo Systems GmbH as the main contractor.

This collaboration primarily focuses on specialized nonwoven markets, particularly for hygiene, medical, and technical applications. The production of specialized nonwovens consisting of short and long staple fiber layers is the goal. These nonwovens are typically made from cellulose pulp and carded materials. In hygiene and medical applications, short-cut cellulose materials play a critical role in absorbing and retaining liquids. When the fiber length drops below 12 mm, the faster flushability of cellulose material offers a significant advantage in terms of waste management.

Wetlaid pulp can be hydrodynamically shaped using headbox technology (flowlip, inclined wire), which can be designed according to demand.

Wetlaid products can be further processed with carded web layers and hydroentanglement, integrating into different production processes.

Kansan Materials has successfully established a production line capable of processing hybrid raw materials developed based on the latest hydrodynamic simulation calculations. This line is equipped with advanced software technologies that assist operators in managing production processes in a fully automated, computer-supported mode.

As the main contractor, Dilo Systems GmbH aims to enhance the efficiency of nonwoven production for the hygiene and medical sectors by integrating Kansan’s wet wipe converting lines and end-of-line equipment. In this scope, the integration of materials produced with Dilo’s “CycloPunch” and “MicroPunch” needling machines into Kansan’s wet wipe converting lines is planned. Kansan is a strong partner in this field, with its expertise and leading position in the industry.

This joint development process and marketing efforts lay an excellent foundation for offering complete lines that can produce carded and needle-punched, carded and hydroentangled, carded and wetlaid nonwovens, as well as combinations of these techniques.

With a vision of offering innovative and sustainable solutions in the nonwoven sector, this partnership aims to increase production efficiency while minimizing environmental impact. Dilo Systems GmbH and Kansan’s technical expertise provides faster, cost- effective production processes tailored to customer needs. Furthermore, solutions

have been developed in line with sustainability goals, such as energy efficiency and the use of recyclable materials. This collaboration is designed to create new opportunities in global markets, particularly in the hygiene, medical, and technical sectors, while expanding our reach to a broader customer base.

Posted: May 1, 2025

Source: Dilo Systems GmbH / Kansan Group

The Martindale Motion: A New Era In Abrasion And Pilling Testing From James Heal

HALIFAX, UK — April 30, 2025 — Achieve higher productivity and efficiency cost savings in abrasion and pilling testing with James Heal’s latest innovation, the Martindale Motion. A re-imagined 9-station Martindale instrument with individual lifting heads, offering the flexibility to run each station independently for different textile tests concurrently.

James Heal’s Martindale in Motion

Historically having worked with Dr Martindale of WIRA in the 1940s, James Heal created the Martindale test instrument as we know it today and has continued its innovation ever since. When the Martindale hit 80 years of existence, the team at James Heal decided it was time to take a fresh look at this classic instrument, elevating it to the next level.

Speed, efficiency, and as you would expect precision, accuracy and user-safety, were put at the heart of the strategy for the next chapter of the Martindale. Following three years of research, engineering design, stringent testing and critical evaluation, the next generation of Martindale has arrived.

Multiple textiles can now be tested at the same time through to conclusion without intervention. Once set up the Martindale Motion can be left running with the sample holders automatically lifting at the required evaluation points, freeing up the operator’s time to do other work without the need to return until the abrasion or pilling test is fully completed, including overnight.

Each sample is kept in-tact at the end point for evaluation and checking, reducing queries on grading, and the potential need for re-testing. With the addition of sophisticated new features, further refinements include a new hinged access to change the self-aligning drive pins, allowing quick and safe switching between tests.

Designed and manufactured in the UK, the James Heal Martindale range has seen numerous updates, new models and innovations over the years such as touchscreen and user-friendly software, best-in-class safety features combined with the signature near silent running of this lab staple instrument. Add to that the introduction of the DurAbrasion multi-function testing machine, later followed by the market-leading evolution, the AquAbrasion wet abrasion tester launched in 2019.

Posted: May 1, 2025

Source: James Heal

Sponsors