F
ashion trends are production challenges faced every day by a textile finisher. The goal
is to produce first-quality goods only. This is especially difficult when weft distortion has been
introduced to the fabric during various process stages.
 Uneven tension distribution across the weft is the main cause for distortion. There are many
							causes for this defect, including tension variations, equipment lineup, improper roller adjustments
							and direct contact of machinery with the material. 
Dealing With Weft Distortion
 Mechanical forces are commonly employed to correct the geometry of a weft that has been
							distorted during the finishing phase. Both mechanical weft straighteners and differential drive
							tenters are commonly applied technologies. 
 By adjusting the speeds of differential tenter chains, or by applying linear tension and
							passing material across rollers that can be pivoted around the center point of the fabric width,
							the weft lines can be moved and realigned. 
 Mechanical weft correction devices have always been used to correct weft distortion,
							primarily on materials where distortion is more visible and becomes an issue for the end-user.
							However, as tolerances grow tighter, production speeds increase, and the fabrics become more
							complex, automatic weft straightening is a must in today’s modern textile finishing operations.
							

Using photoelectronic detection in oscillation removes possible mechanical difficulties.
Straightening Principles
 The history of automatic weft straightening goes back more than 40 years. Generally, there
							are two common automatic weft-straightening principles used today: automatic straightening by means
							of mechanics; and automatic straightening by means of electromechanics. 
 Automatic straightening by means of mechanical force is based on the parallelogram effect.
							When the distortion of the fabric is along a diagonal axis, the warp and weft geometry, initially
							orthogonal, assumes a parallelogram configuration. When the two selvages are pulled out to stretch
							the cloth to its full width, the weft is tightened, generating complex forces in a parallelogram
							configuration to establish a square structure. This straightening force can be exploited for
							restoring proper weave geometry if the selvages, in spite of their lateral tensions, are
							sufficiently free to move in the direction of the warp. 
 Automatic straightening by means of electromechanics is the most common method employed
							today. Weft geometry is automatically detected using a mechanical or electrical sensor. That
							information is then transformed into a signal that displaces rollers, making the correction as
							necessary. The weft-straightening effect here is the result of the difference in distance traveled
							by one selvage in relation to the other over the rollers in the weft-straightening system. 
 
							Sensing Technology
In order to have an effective automatic weft-straightening system, it is important for the
							sensing device to detect all the possible fabric styles, designs, colors and structures. With
							today’s complex textile products, that is not always an easy task. The ideal detection system is
							capable of sensing denim, sheeting, jacquard, apparel and automotive fabrics; fiberglass, carpet,
							lace, terry towels and a large variety of technical textiles, among other products.
							
							
 In the early 1960s, two major detection systems on the market were used for detecting weft
							distortion in fabric. One system involved the use of mechanical principles, and the other utilized
							photoelectronic sensors.
							
Mechanical Detection Principle
 The mechanical principle is based on the use of two wheels mounted on a freely moving
							mounting pin. Under normal conditions, both wheels are turned by the passing fabric, resulting in a
							homogenous signal. When a distortion is sensed, the tension created by the skewed weft causes the
							freely mounted wheels to turn left or right depending on the distortion. A non-proportional signal
							is generated by a differential amplifier, sending correction signals to a correction device. As
							long as the wheels in continuous contact with the material remain in the same good working
							condition, the measurement results remain satisfactory. Any uneven fabric surface challenges the
							mechanical principle and generates asymmetrical distortion. This system has not been further
							developed in its design and has been discontinued because of limited detection abilities and
							hardware reliability. 
Photoelectronic Detection Principle
 The photoelectronic sensor is based on a signal modulation created by the passing web
							structure. One of the first photoelectronic sensors was based on several photo elements located on
							one side of the web and a light source on the opposite side of the web. When the weft line was
							parallel and straight in front of the sensor, a somewhat equally strong signal was generated in
							both channels. 
 If the weft line was not parallel to the sensor, one pair of photo elements generated more
							signal than the other, and this determined the distortion. That type of sensor could only
							differentiate between left or right distortion and was not able to quantify the amount or angle of
							distortion. Therefore, a proportional correction based on the physical distortion was not possible.
 The next generations of optical sensors utilized only one photo element by letting it freely
							oscillate between known limits. That improved the linearity, resolution and accuracy of each
							sensor, enabling it to detect more complex fabric structures. 
 With microcomputers entering the industrial arena, it was not long until the first
							microcontroller-based detection system was introduced. Stepper motor technology for linear movement
							replaced the free-oscillation detection lens and improved lighting principles such as infrared
							light-emitting diodes and reflex light sources, bringing the system more up-to-date. 
 The photoelectronic detection technology is utilized in various executions such as
							oscillation, rotation or shifted dual-rotating mode. By rotating the lens 360º instead of always
							oscillating on the same position, one could avoid possible mechanical difficulties. However, there
							is some valuable time lost by scanning areas of the fabric that are unrelated to the weft line. The
							shifted dual-rotating mode reduces such time delays in collecting valuable weft distortion
							information with a two-lens system. 

The latest CCD matrix camera from Erhardt + Leimer GmbH employs high-resolution auto-focus
and auto-zoom technologies.
Weft Detection Using Cameras
 The rapid reductions in the prices of computer systems and digital cameras combined with
							advanced image-processing techniques have led to the introduction of several vision systems to the
							textile manufacturer. There are two types of camera systems that can be used to create an image:
							line scan camera technology; or charged-couple device (CCD) matrix camera technology. 
 The line scan camera in combination with an encoder creates an image while the web passes
							by. After capturing the image, the evaluation software uses special algorithms to process the
							digital information. 
 The line scan camera technology typically is used to detect the full width of the web,
							detecting and evaluating patterns rather than the weft line. That can be realized with either one
							or two cameras, depending on the area of interest. However, if there is no pattern in the web, the
							line scan technology is not able to detect any distortion in a web. 
 A matrix camera takes images similar to any conventional digital camera on the market. The
							web is imaged several times per second, whether running or not, on a 2-D area. The camera looks at
							multiple weft lines simultaneously, providing a high data rate of the passing weft structure. With
							sophisticated software tools and mathematic calculation, a 3-D image is processed, detecting not
							only the weft, but also the warp of a web. 
 The matrix camera technology is used for a closer look at the individual weft and utilizes
							the weft structure in its calculation of the residual web distortion. Whether with several cameras
							evenly distributed over the full width of the web, or just one scanning camera taking images
							across, a large cross-direction and machine-direction profile of the passing web is captured. A
							reflecting circumference infrared illumination guarantees the best uniform imaging results. 
 The latest camera introduced from Germany-based Erhardt + Leimer GmbH employs
							high-resolution auto-focus and auto-zoom technologies that allow the camera to view an optimum
							evaluation area and the largest 2-D area possible. The camera is mounted 250 millimeters away from
							the web, moving it away from sometimes harsh existing environmental conditions. The image is then
							processed within a 3-D space and filtered through a fast Fourier transformation (FFT), resulting in
							spectral data. Separating the noise from the actual high-level spectral data leaves the positioning
							information of the weft and the warp. 
 A major breakthrough of the 2-D image detection system using CCD matrix camera technology
							makes detection on many difficult webs such as carpet, jacquard and thicker wefts a problem of the
							past. Whereas conventional photoelectronic systems detect one weft at a time, the CCD matrix camera
							has the ability to evaluate a large number of weft lines simultaneously, even if the web is not
							moving. And whereas conventional photoelectronic sensors are required to have a minimum speed for
							detection, the speed of the process has no influence on the final result or the quality of the
							evaluated detection area when using the CCD matrix camera. 
 In addition to increasing the number of weft lines being detected, the system with its wide
							field of view also has increased drastically the evaluation area in the cross direction of the
							weft. That makes it more accurate and reliable because it sees far more than conventional detection
							systems see. 
 Many disadvantages associated with conventional detection systems can be overcome by using
							image-processing techniques to monitor webs of all kinds. New camera measurement systems have
							improved the range of use from unstructured, homogenous webs to complex, patterned fabrics. 
 Higher-quality products and more satisfied customers result from more accurate and reliable
							technologies. 
							Editor’s Note: Udo Skarke is manager of Germany-based Erhardt + Leimer GmbH’s Textile Division
							in Duncan, S.C. 
 
             


