bluesign: Driven By Responsible Production

Barbara Oswald

bluesign is celebrating 25 years of helping the entire textile and apparel value chain deliver measurable impacts that matters to industry, people and the environment.

TW Special Report

Switzerland-based bluesign technologies recently celebrated its 25th anniversary. Established in 2000 to offer sustainable chemical and environmental management solutions for the textile and fashion industry, bluesign developed a science-based input stream management system with the aim of eliminating harmful substances at the source. The system also helps ensure safer working conditions, reduces environmental impacts and provides safer products for consumers.

Esther Paez

Today, bluesign counts more than 900 global system partners who work towards benchmarks for responsible production using bluesign’s criteria for chemical use, environmental performance and resource efficiency, while delivering measurable reductions in environmental impact.

“We are the only service provider in the textile sector offering a comprehensive eco-system approach that connects chemical management, manufacturing process optimization, and sustainable product stewardship,” said Barbara Oswald, chief commercial officer, bluesign.“Our work goes beyond certification and compliance. We deliver measurable improvement solutions and ongoing support to help our partners make sustainability an integral part of their business.”

“bluesign was born out of a bold idea, that sustainability could be embedded into the DNA of product creation,” said Daniel Rüfenacht, CEO of bluesign technologies.“Twenty-five years later, we’re proud to be a beacon of trust, innovation, and responsibility, and to partner with industry leaders worldwide in building a more sustain-able future together.”

Textile World recently had the opportunity to speak with Oswald as well as Esther Paez, bluesign’s Sustainability product manager, about the company and what lies ahead having achieved this milestone anniversary.

TW: How has bluesign’s mission evolved since the organization was founded 25 years ago, and what role do you see bluesign playing in the next decade as new regulations such as the EU Green Deal and Digital Product Passport take shape?

Barbara Oswald: Over the past 25 years, bluesign has evolved from an industry pioneer focused on safer inputs to a trusted partner driving sustainability transformation across the textile value chain. As regulatory expectations increase, our mission remains the same — to help industry produce the lowest possible impact on the environment and people, backed by primary verified data, transparency and practical solutions. Our system is geared for digital traceability and verified information that initiatives like the EU Green Deal and Digital Product Passport will require. In that sense, bluesign enables companies not only to comply, but to lead.

TW: There are other sustainability frameworks including ZDHC, OEKO-TEX, and GOTS. How does bluesign position itself among these organizations?

Esther Paez: We welcome the work of other frameworks that contribute to the industry’s sustainability goals. What makes bluesign unique is our integrated, end-to-end approach, geared towards sustainability improvement. We work across the entire value chain, connecting chemical suppliers, manufacturers, and brands through a single verified system. bluesign functions as a service partner, combining data-driven insight, on-site verification and continuous improvement support.

Over the years, bluesign has expanded the textile and apparel categories covered by its system to include denim, footwear and leather products.

TW: How does bluesign ensure alignment and accountability among a wide range of mills, suppliers, and brands in the global System Partner network?

Paez: Alignment comes from a shared framework built on trust, transparency, and measurable performance. All bluesign System Partners are part of the same ecosystem, connected through common principles, verifiable criteria and a commitment to continuous improvement.

Each partner’s performance is verified on-site and supported through data analysis. But our approach goes beyond verification: Our experts work closely with partners to interpret results, identify improvement areas and implement solutions. This continuous engagement fosters accountability, builds capability, and strengthens collaboration across the entire network.

TW: What are some of the greatest challenges you see today in managing impact, and how does bluesign help manufacturers and brands address them?

Oswald: Today’s biggest challenge is navigating the complexity of multiple sustainability expectations — balancing impact reduction, costs, due diligence, reporting or compliance across many dimensions (ESG). Many companies struggle to connect these dots across their supply chain and geographies. bluesign helps by providing verified primary data, technical insight, and tailored improvement pathways that make sustainable transformation manageable. Through our collaborative model, we help partners move from reactive compliance to proactive impact reduction.

TW: How does bluesign measure and verify envi-ronmental improvements at partner facilities?

Paez: Our partner assessments go beyond certification to our standards, they are designed to drive measurable improvement. We measure resource efficiency, chemical performance, and emissions to air and water. Following each assessment, we share results and tailored improvement plans with partners, supporting them in setting clear targets and taking practical action. The verified data that results from this process provides a transparent and credible foundation for measuring progress and demonstrating real impact.

TW: How does bluesign maintain credibility in a world where greenwashing and self-reported data are common?

Oswald: Credibility comes from verification and science, not promises. bluesign enables its partners and brands to provide evidence-based sustainability data, helping them communicate honestly and avoid greenwashing. Our ongoing assessments and action plans are based on data review, technical validation and independent on-site evaluation. This gives both brands and consumers’ confidence that bluesign stands for proven, trustworthy performance.

TW: Are there any new innovations in pro-cessing or monitoring that excite you as potential breakthroughs in cleaner textile production?

Paez: Innovation today is happening where chemistry, process efficiency and circularity meet. We’re particularly encouraged by advances in cleaner dyeing technologies, chemical recycling of polyester, and closed-loop systems that reduce waste and extend material life. bluesign’s solutions are flexible to accommodate these welcomed new developments — working with chemical suppliers, manufacturers, and recyclers to ensure that new processes meet our safety and sustainability requirements from the start. These innovations show that true sustainability is not about compromise — it’s about smarter chemistry, efficient production and a system that keeps resources in use.

TW: Certification can be complex and expensive, especially for smaller companies or those in developing regions. How does bluesign work with companies to make its services accessible?

Paez: We recognize that every partner has different starting points and capabilities. bluesign offers scalable implementation pathways, allowing each company to progress step-by-step while receiving hands-on guidance from our experts. Our role is to support, not to police. By offering practical tools, regional engagement, and capacity building, we help companies of all sizes participate in responsible production.

bluesign’s work with textile manufacturers focuses mainly on tier 2 of the textile supply chain.

TW: Tell readers about the bluesign Academy.

Oswald: The bluesign Academy has long been recognized as our knowledge hub for sharing expertise and training across the industry. As we continue to evolve, this work is becoming more closely integrated within bluesign itself, reflecting how deeply knowledge and expertise are embedded in everything we do. Going forward, we may call it something different, but its purpose remains the same — to equip our partners and the broader industry with the under-standing, tools and insights needed to drive measurable improvement and responsible production. At its core, it’s still about the people and the expertise behind bluesign — helping our partners turn knowledge into lasting progress.

TW: Looking ahead, do you see a future where “clean production” is the default and not the exception? What will it take to tip the scales closer to a safer, cleaner textile production environment?

Oswald: That is exactly the future we are building toward. The shift will depend on these things:

  • Collaboration — a shared responsibility across the entire value chain;
  • Verification — so progress can be measured and trusted;
  • Continuous improvement — supported by knowledge, data and partnership;
  • Innovation and scalabilty — to ensure solutions can grow and deliver impact at every level of the industry; and
  • Consumer awareness —empowering people to understand, trust, and choose responsibly produced textiles.

When these elements come together, responsible production becomes not an aspiration, but the industry standard.

TW: How is bluesign thinking about the role of consumers in driving sustainability?

Oswald: Looking forward, we are focused on building awareness with end consumers. Ultimately, the demand for sustainable products comes from those who buy them. By evolving our certifications, communication, and transparency, we aim to make it easier for consumers to understand, trust, and choose responsibly produced textiles.

TW: Please give a quick synopsis of your company’s value proposition. What should readers expect from bluesign in the future?

Oswald: bluesign is the only service provider in the textile industry offering a comprehensive eco-system approach, from chemicals to end products, built around delivering improvement solutions and ongoing support. We bring together science, data, and collaboration to help the industry reduce adverse impact and operate responsibly. What truly sets us apart is the long-term trust and collaboration we’ve built with our System Partners over more than two decades. These relation-ships allow us to continuously refine our system and deliver solutions that are both practical and proven. Looking ahead, we’ll continue expanding our system’s digital capabilities and supporting our partners through data-driven insights, collaboration, and innovation, always focused on measurable, real-world results.

TW: Why do you do what you do? What motivates you?

Oswald: Our motivation comes from the belief that sustainability should be achievable for everyone in the textile industry. We are driven by the progress we see when our partners reduce impact, improve operations, and lead the way toward responsible production. For us, it’s about partnership and empowerment, helping the entire value chain deliver measurable impact that matters to industry, people and the environment.

2025 Quarterly Issue IV

 

Tiger Group Offers Assets From Turf Company’s Georgia Plant

CALHOUN, GA. — December 2, 2025 — Tiger Group today announced plans to auction assets from the 210,000-square-foot Calhoun plant of a major synthetic turf maker and installer.

Bidding in the timed online auction at SoldTiger.com opens on Thursday, December 4, at 10:30 a.m. (ET) and closes on Thursday, December 11, at 10:30 a.m. (ET). The plant-closing sale is an assignment for the benefit of creditors.

Tiger Group’s December 11 online auction includes machinery and equipment, rolling stock, inventory and plant support equipment from ACT Global Americas, Inc’s closed warehouse.

“ACT Global Americas, Inc.’s former warehouse is full of useful machinery and equipment, rolling stock, inventory and plant support equipment,” said John Coelho, Senior Director, Tiger Commercial & Industrial. “It’s a strong opportunity for other artificial turf manufacturers, textile companies or just those who are looking for great bargains on assets such as trucks, tractors, tools and landscaping inventory.”

The company describes itself as one of the world’s largest producers of artificial turf, with products that include capping systems and artificial grass geomembrane liners for landfills and artificial grass for airport ground cover as well as sports such as football, soccer, baseball, rugby, tennis and field hockey.

Highlights of the December 11 auction include:

MANUFACTURING & INSTALL

  • 2008 CMC half-gauge, single-feed tufter with PIV yarn drive and 365 position, two-story creel
  • 2022 Zhejian Tianzhu textile machinery yarn twister (less than 5 hours of use)
  • Allma/Saurer Technocorder twister
  • ATI PD96 3D precision laser box grader
  • (2) Jacobsen Turfco Met-R-Matic XL topdressers
  • (4) model 920HDE GreensGroomer turf brushes
  • (2) Hot Melt Technologies Benchmark 315 portable hot melt gluers

RAW & FINISHED INVENTORY
Artificial turf manufacturers and landscapers will find more than 250,000 pounds of polyethylene (PE) yarn in assorted colors and deniers (thickness); more than 100,000 linear yards of primary backing, and more than 475,000 square feet of landscape inventory.

ROLLING STOCK & FORKLIFTS

  • (30) gas and diesel Ford, Chevrolet and Dodge Ram pickups
  • Open and enclosed trailers, some from as late as 2025
  • Gooseneck trailers by Texas Bragg and Load Trail
  • Utility and cargo trailers by Arising, Homesteader, American Hauler and others
  • (2) Kubota Tractors, L3302HST & L3301D
  • Forklifts by Linde, Clark and Komatsu ranging in capacity from 5,500 to 8,000 pound, some from as late as 2022

OTHER ASSETS
Also available are a walk-behind power broom, spare creel, Lay-Mor 8′ grooming broom, turf sewing machines, portable generators, laser levels, a pedestal drill press, a PVC welder, a bench grinder, paint sprayers and various powered hand tools.

Plant support and office assets include a hydraulic pallet jack, ladders, hand trucks, carts, pedestal fans, a strapping cart, shop vacs, a floor jack, a parts washer, flame-proof storage cabinets, maintenance supplies, office sundries, desks, chairs, a conference table, a breakroom, file cabinets and a reception desk.

Inspections are available by appointment on Wednesday, December 10, at the Calhoun plant. To arrange an inspection or obtain other information, email: auctions@tigergroup.com

For asset photos, descriptions, and other information, visit https://soldtiger.com/sales/

Posted: December 2, 2025

Source: Tiger Group

Avoid Being Labeled “Noncompliant”: The Basics Of Textile And Wool Product Labeling

Julia Solomon Ensor

Compliance with FTC regulations is essential to avoid enforcement actions, litigation and penalties.

By Julia Solomon Ensor

For companies in the textile or wool products business, time invested in a compliance check today could save time, money and hassle associated with a regulatory inquiry in the future. After all, the last time the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) publicly investigated companies for allegedly mislabeling textile products, those companies ended up having to pay millions of dollars in penalties.

When it comes to textile and wool labels, the FTC is the primary federal regulator. Pursuant to the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act, 15 U.S.C. § 70 et seq. (Textile Act), and implementing rules, 16 C.F.R. Part 303,1 and the Wool Products Labeling Act, 15 U.S.C. § 68 et seq. (Wool Act), and implementing rules, 16 C.F.R. Part 300,2 the FTC requires every covered product’s label to include three key pieces of information:

  1. fiber content;
  2. country of origin; and
  3. manufacturer identity.

Labels can contain additional, non-required information if it is not misleading, but if a marketer’s label does not address these three categories of information, it is noncompliant.

Fiber Content

Historically, most of the FTC’s textile-related litigation has focused on fiber disclosures, with most cases alleging companies misled consumers by using the wrong generic fiber names. For example, the FTC has repeatedly sued companies selling textiles made from rayon or viscose derived from bamboo pulp for labeling their products as “bamboo” when the labels should have said rayon or viscose.

Most recently, in 2022, the FTC blanketed the marketplace with notices to retailers reminding them that Commission decisions have determined it is an unfair or deceptive act or practice to misidentify a product’s fiber content. The notices included a synopsis of FTC cases reaching this conclusion. When the targeted retailers failed to clean up allegedly deceptive claims within a reasonable amount of time of receiving the letters, the FTC initiated enforcement actions. And, once the FTC initiated the cases on fiber content disclosures, the threshold alleged Textile Act violations opened the door for the FTC to investigate other marketing claims on the retailer sites, ultimately arguing that these retailers further violated the law because they also misled consumers as to the environmental benefits of their bamboo-derived products. So, in those cases, litigation triggered by specific issues with fiber content identification evolved into large-scale matters involving other marketing claims. The FTC ultimately settled the cases for penalties of $2.5 million and $3 million, respectively.

Five Percent Matters

With this frame in mind, textile marketers should always begin compliance reviews with a careful check of fiber content disclosures. First, marketers should determine each constituent fiber in each product that accounts for 5 percent or more of the product by weight. For those fibers, companies should ensure they are using correct generic names listed in either 16 C.F.R. § 303.73 or ISO Standard 2076: 2010(E). Marketers should list the names on the label in descending order of predominance. For fibers other than wool that comprise less than 5 percent of the product by weight, companies can generally disclose them as “other fiber[s].”

Allowances & Tolerances

There are a few allowances in the regulations that make disclosures easier. First, the FTC permits a 3 percent tolerance on claims to account for slight variability across product lines.

Litigation triggered by specific issues with fiber content identification evolved into large-scale matters involving other marketing claims. The FTC ultimately settled the cases for penalties of $2.5 million and$3 million, respectively.

So, as long as companies are doing their best to be accurate, error within that 3 percent range is generally low risk. Second, there is no requirement to disclose fiber content for things like collars and cuffs, trim, linings — unless used for warmth — small amounts of ornamentation, or threads that hold a product together. And, finally, if a product includes using clippings or textile waste materials of indeterminant fiber content, it is generally low risk to disclose those materials as unknown fiber content.

Country Of Origin

Country of origin is next on the compliance checklist. The Textile Act and Wool Act require companies to disclose origin for all products, whether they are imported or made in the United States. For imported products, this is easy. The tag should simply reflect the product’s country of origin as disclosed at time of importation. If the product is not imported, things get a little more complicated. Specifically, when it comes to figuring out whether a textile or wool product that underwent final processing in the United States can be labeled as “Made in USA” or “Made in USA of Imported Materials,” the FTC uses the “one step removed” rule.

One Step Removed

The “one step removed” rule requires companies to look at the origin of the materials one step removed from the product’s final manufacturing process. If those materials are imported, the marketer must disclose that on the label. If those materials are U.S. materials, the marketer can label the product as “Made in USA.”

For example, a company selling a woven shirt should look at where the fabric was made, because that step is one step removed from the final step in shirt production — cut-and-sew. If that step happened in the United States, the marketer could label the shirt as “Made in the USA.” But, if the company imported fabric and then cut and sewed it into a shirt in the United States, the marketer would have to label the shirt as “Made in USA of Imported Fabric.” And, if the product the marketer sells happens to be a flat product like a sheet or a towel, just saying “imported fabric” is insufficient. For those products, companies must identify the county the product came from such as “Made in USA of fabric made in China,” for example.

The ”one step removed” rule requires companies to look at the origin of the materials one step removed from the product’s final manufacturing process. If those materials are imported, the marketer must disclose that on the label.

The FTC has pursued enforcement action against textile manufacturers for incorrect country-of-origin claims on labels. However, those cases have mostly involved egregious conduct. For example, in 2022, the FTC sued a marketer for allegedly ripping tags out of apparel products that appropriately disclosed the products were made in China and replacing them with “Made in USA” claims. That company and its owner settled with the FTC for an injunction and monetary relief of $211,335.

Consumer Versus DoD

Although the “one step removed” analysis is the rule for most textile manufacturers seeking to label their products as “Made in USA” for sale to consumers, it is important to note that there is an additional wrinkle for marketers selling their products to the Department of Defense (DoD). Specifically, companies supplying products to the DoD should be aware that the Berry Amendment, 10 U.S.C. § 4862, and its implementing regulations in most cases prohibit the DoD from acquiring clothing or textile products unless those products are domestically sourced. In general, a covered product will not comply with this requirement unless its entire production process — from raw material sourcing through final assembly — is performed in the United States. In this context, if early-stage inputs to a product are foreign-sourced, evidence of compliance with the “one step removed” standard will be insufficient.

Manufacturer Identity

The final item on the label compliance checklist is the identity of the manufacturer, importer, or other dealer. Marketers must include this information because, when people buy a product, they need to be able to figure out who markets, distributes, or otherwise handles it. To comply, marketers can either print company names directly on labels, or, if saving space and facilitating record keeping are priorities, apply for and include an optional Registered Identification (RN)4 number on the tag.

Don’t Confuse Or Mislead

Compliance begins with ensuring all labels include these three disclosures, every time. Beyond that, to avoid a regulatory action, marketers should ensure labels are securely attached until products are delivered to customers — in the neck, if the products have one. And, as is true in all advertising, marketers should be careful not to include extra information that could confuse or mislead people.

References:

1 https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-16/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-303

2 https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-16/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-300

3 https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-16/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-303/section-303.7

4 https://rn.ftc.gov/rns

Editor’s Note: Julia Solomon Ensor is counsel in the Entertainment & Media Industry Group at the Washington-based office of Reed Smith where she helps clients navigate complex advertising and consumer protection challenges. She has 15 years of hands-on experience at the FTC where she served as the Made in USA and Green Guides program manager.

2025 Quarterly Issue IV

AATCC Honors 2025 Award Recipients For The AATCC Future Leaders Award

DURHAM, N.C.— November 21, 2025 — AATCC honors 2025 award recipients for the AATCC Future Leaders Award, the J. William Weaver Paper of the Year Award, and the AATCC Technical Committee on Research (TCR) Service Award. These awards were presented on November 11, 2025, at the AATCC Fall Committee Meetings. This year, the Fall Committee Meetings were held November 11-13, 2025, at the StateView Hotel in Raleigh, NC, USA.

Future Leaders Award

The AATCC Future Leaders Award recognizes promising young professionals in the fields of textiles, apparel, and related material sciences, provides acknowledgment and recognition to enhance their careers, engages these young professionals in the work of the Association, and brings their insights and needs to the forefront. Award recipients represent the various AATCC Interest Groups.

Award Recipients

Xiuzhu Fei, senior product development engineer at Microban International Inc., leads sustainable antimicrobial product development and has launched two next-generation products. She holds multiple patents, including one that earned a 2025 Silver Edison Innovation Award, and has advanced degrees in textile chemistry and fiber science from NC State. An active AATCC member since 2016, Fei contributes to research committees, conference steering groups, and speaks at industry summits.

Karen Haberland, senior project officer at ECRI Institute, leads investigations on PPE and vaccine administration technologies and has directed grant-funded studies on isolation gown protectiveness. She has developed technical specifications for global procurement programs, published research, and holds a patent for a medical device curvature system. Haberland earned degrees in mechanical engineering from Lehigh and Rowan Universities and studied engineering research at the National University of Ireland Galway. Since joining AATCC in 2021, she has served as secretary of RA75 and chairs a subcommittee on water resistance test methods.

Kaitlin Sigmon is an analytical lab technician at the Manufacturing Solutions Center, specializing in testing apparel, PPE, and upholstery materials since 2018. She actively promotes domestic manufacturing and quality standards and serves on multiple ASTM committees, including textiles and PPE. Sigmon earned her BS in Biology from Western Carolina University and completed the ASTM Emerging Professionals Program in 2025. As an AATCC member since 2022, she serves as secretary for RA23 and RA109 and participates in RA31 Antimicrobial Activity.

Monét Freeman is lead physical testing specialist at Gaston College’s Textile Technology Center, where she oversees lab operations and conducts standardized testing on fibers, yarns, and fabrics. She also provides customer consultations and previously coordinated customized textile training and helped launch the Textile Academy. Freeman brings extensive industry experience from companies like World Elastic Corporation, Kate Spade, and Madewell, and is a member of ASTM and ISO 9001:2015. She earned her BS in Textile Technology: Medical Textiles from NC State in 2014.J.W. Weaver Paper of the Year Award

J.W. Weaver Paper of the Year Award

The AATCC Publications Committee presents the J. William Weaver Paper of the Year Award to the author or authors of the best peer reviewed paper published in the AATCC journal each year. The best paper is selected from among those published in the AATCC Journal of Research during the preceding calendar year. All authors of the winning paper are recognized. The award includes a framed certificate signed by the AATCC president and the Publications Committee chair.

About the Authors

Xiaoxiao Qiu, Shuaitong Liang, Wenqing Cheng, Hongjuan Zhang, Liujun Pei, and Jiping Wang are the recipients of the J. William Weaver Paper of the Year Award for their paper, “The Environmental Impact of Low-Pressure Anhydrous Dyeing Technology for Polyester: Carbon Footprint Quantification and Evaluation” published in the November/December 2024 issue of AATCC Journal of Research.

Xiaoxiao Qiu earned a bachelor’s degree from Zhejiang Sci-Tech University in 2022 and earned a master’s degree from Shanghai University of Engineering Science in 2025. In 2022, Qiu received a Provincial Government Scholarship, and received a Graduate Academic Scholarship in 2022, 2023, and 2024.

Shuaitong Liang is an associate professor and Department Associate Dean for the Shanghai University of Engineering Science, School of Textiles and Fashion. Since 2019, Liang has worked at the Shanghai Engineering Research Center for Clean Production of Textile Chemistry. Liang received a bachelor’s degree from Shaanxi University of Science and Technology (2010), a master’s degree from Shanghai University of Engineering Science (2014), and a doctoral degree from Donghua University (2018). Liang also studied at the University of California, Davis, as a visiting scholar from 2016 to 2017. Liang has several recently published research papers in relevant journals, including AATCC Journal of Research.

Wenqing Cheng works at Zhejiang Green Universe Textile Technology Co. Cheng received a bachelor’s degree from Qingdao University (2012), a Master of Engineering  from Beijing Institute of Fashion Technology (2015), and a doctoral degree from Zhejiang Sci-Tech University (2021). In 2023, Cheng served as the Deputy Director of Research and Development in the Research and Development department of Zhejiang Lvyu Textile Technology Co., Ltd. Cheng has papers published in several journals.

Hongjuan Zhang is an associate professor at Shanghai University of Engineering Science. She received a bachelor’s degree from Zhongyuan University of Technology (2012), and a master’s (2015) and a PhD (2019) from Donghua University.

Liujun Pei works as an associate professor at Shanghai University of Engineering Science.
In 2011, Pei received his bachelor’s degree from Zhongyuan University of Technology, and degree (2014) and a doctoral degree (2017) from Zhejiang Sci-Tech University. In 2021, Pei received the Wang Shanyuan’s Outstanding Doctoral Dissertation. Pei has several published works in various journals.

Jiping Wang is a professor at Shanghai University of Engineering Science. Wang earned a bachelor’s degree from Zhejiang Sci-tech University (1982), a master’s degree from Donghua University (1985), and a PhD from the University of Texas at Arlington (1994). Wang joined AATCC in 1995, and is an active member, holding leadership positions and participating in several research committees. Since 2015, he has served as Chair of C7 Publications Committee, on the AATCC Board of Directors, and the AATCC Foundation Board of Directors. Wang has also served as the AATCC Global Membership Representative in China for the past 10 years.

Technical Committee on Research (TCR) Service Award

The Technical Committee on Research Service Award was established in 2008 to recognize those members who have contributed greatly to the AATCC organization in a technical capacity. Individual members of the Association with at least five years of continuous membership in AATCC, who have contributed outstanding technical service to the Association through activity in a research committee, are eligible. The Award consists of a plaque and an honorarium.

Award Recipients

Alan Buttenhoff joined AATCC in 2003. He serves as the chair of RA57 Floor Covering Test Methods research committee and is active in RA50 Lightfastness and Weathering Test Methods research committee. He served as a member of the AATCC Board of Directors from 2010 to 2012. Since joining AATCC, Buttenhoff has established several work groups that improved the stain reference scale manufacturing process, developed a new vinyl for the vinyl staining test method, and improved documentation and detection limits of the TM189-2017e Test Method for Fluorine Content of Carpet Fibers. He is an active member of the Technical Committee on Research and is a voting member of the Materials Interest Group.

Miranda Klaas joined AATCC in 2019. Since 2019, Klaas has served as chair of RA59 Fibrous Test Materials research committee and has served as secretary of RA60 Colorfastness to Washing Test Methods research committee. Klaas has attended several conferences, including the Textile Testing Training Conference, and is a part of various committees. She is a member of the Technical Committee on Research, the Materials Interest Group, and serves as the social media content creator for the Delaware Valley Section.

Posted: December 2, 2025

Source: The American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists (AATCC)

SINTX Technologies Signs Supply Agreement With EVONIK To Manufacture Silicon Nitride–PEEK Compound For AI-Assisted, 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Implants

SALT LAKE CITY, Utah — December 1, 2025 — SINTX Technologies, Inc. (“SINTX” or the “Company”), an advanced ceramics and biomaterials company, today announced that it has signed a supply agreement with Evonik Corporation (“EVONIK”), a global leader in high‑performance polymers, to manufacture the Company’s proprietary silicon nitride–PEEK compound (SiN/PEEK) (U.S. Patent No. 10,806,831) engineered for AI‑assisted additive manufacturing of patient‑specific implants that will be produced using equipment already in place at SINTX’s U.S.-based production facility.

Under the agreement, EVONIK will produce SiN/PEEK compound leveraging its commercial-scale capability to SINTX’s specifications, enabling the Company to immediately begin manufacturing AI‑designed, 3D‑printed, patient‑specific implants. SINTX has already received physician requests to provide humanitarian‑use vertebral body replacement (VBR) implants for orthopedic and neurosurgical oncology patients following tumor resections in the spine. In addition, the Company intends to use the SiN/PEEK compound to support regulatory clearances of patient matched and traditional subtractive manufactured implantable devices.

Eric K. Olson, Chairman, President & CEO of SINTX, said, “This agreement with EVONIK is another pivotal moment for SINTX and for the field of patient‑specific implants. By combining EVONIK’s industrial‑scale PEEK polymer manufacturing expertise with SINTX’s silicon nitride biomaterial manufacturing capabilities, we can deliver next‑generation implants that address critical needs in trauma, spine, oncology, and beyond. We believe SiN/PEEK offers compelling advantages over standard PEEK, including antipathogenic surface characteristics, osteogenic potential, and improved visualization—features that matter in complex, high‑risk procedures.”

Marc Knebel, head of EVONIK’s Medical Devices & Systems market segment, said, “We are excited to support SINTX in bringing a high‑performance SiN/PEEK composite filament to market for additive and subtractive manufacturing of regulated medical devices. This is another example of enabling innovation that EVONIK has delivered to improve medical outcomes. Our collaboration is designed to provide consistent quality, supply reliability, and scalability—foundational elements for our continued broader collaboration and data generation to support future medical device market work.”

Why SiN/PEEK for Patient-Specific Implants

SINTX’s silicon nitride has been studied for its antipathogenic behavior and osteogenic properties, while PEEK composites are valued for radiolucency and mechanical tunability. The SiN/PEEK combination aims to deliver:

  • Antipathogenic surface behavior to help reduce microbial adherence on implant surfaces.
  • Osteogenic support to promote bone on-growth and integration.
  • Improved visualization vs. standard PEEK for intra-operative and post-operative imaging.
  • Design freedom via AI-assisted, additive manufacturing for patient-specific geometries.
  • Scalable, consistent filament to support high-mix, low-volume production typical of patient-specific workflows.

With today’s supply agreement, the parties envision making SiN/PEEK compound available to other qualified manufacturers for complex implant indications where silicon nitride’s attributes may add clinical and economic value.

SINTX’s near‑term humanitarian efforts are focused on trauma and oncology indications for post‑tumor resection cases, where surgeons face challenging anatomy and infection risk, and where patient‑specific designs may facilitate better fit, fixation and overall clinical outcomes, stated Dr. Ryan Bock, SINTX Chief Technology Officer. “We’re responding to real‑world surgeon requests in oncology‑related care. Our immediate focus is on humanitarian‑use cases while we build the quality systems, regulatory files, and production capacity to expand into additional indications through appropriate FDA pathways.”

For more information on SINTX Technologies or its materials platform, visit www.sintx.com.

 

Posted: December 2, 2025

Source: SINTX Technologies, Inc.

 

YKK To Make Its Consumer Electronics Show (CES) Debut With Next-Generation Fastening Solutions

TOKYO — December 2, 2025 — YKK Corporation announced that it will make its debut at CES 2026 (Consumer Electronics Show), the world’s largest technology exhibition, to be held in Las Vegas, Nevada, in January 2026, where it will showcase groundbreaking innovations that connect the future.

AiryString®

Visitors will discover how YKK is redefining everyday functionality through smart, sustainable, and connected fastening technologies.

At this exhibition, under the theme “Fastening the Future: Where Technology Meets Design,” YKK will showcase new possibilities for fastening solutions that fuse technology and design. From its lineup of fastening products available in over 70 countries and regions worldwide—including zippers, snaps, hook-and-loop fasteners, and buckles—YKK will present a range of innovative concept models, including an autonomous zipper. Through these exhibits, visitors will experience YKK’s vision for creating new value and shaping the future of manufacturing.

Comment from Terry Tsukumo, Senior Vice President, Product Strategy Division, Global Sales Headquarters, YKK Corporation:

Autonomous Zipper

“In April 2025, YKK established a new division, the Global Product Innovation Center (GPIC). Headquartered in Silicon Valley, USA, with additional offices in Kurobe and Tokyo, Japan, GPIC collaborates with startups and research institutions through industry-academia partnerships to gain deep customer insights and address latent needs, driving the creation of new value.

“YKK integrates its sales, development, and manufacturing teams to develop innovative products that solve challenges, propose new applications, and deliver compelling solutions—all with the goal of building a better future. Experience YKK’s commitment to innovation firsthand at CES.”

Posted: December 2, 2025

Source: YKK Corporation

Asahi Kasei Advance And Teijin Frontier To Integrate Businesses For Sustainable Growth

TOKYO — December 1, 2025 — Asahi Kasei has announced that Asahi Kasei and Teijin Limited (“Teijin”) have entered into an agreement today to implement an absorption-type merger between Asahi Kasei Advance Corp. (“Asahi Kasei Advance”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Asahi Kasei, and Teijin Frontier Co., Ltd. (“Teijin Frontier”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Teijin, whereby Teijin Frontier will serve as the surviving company and become a joint venture between Asahi Kasei (20%) and Teijin (80%), effective October 1, 2026.

Asahi Kasei Advance was established in 2015 as a trading company primarily handling products from the Asahi Kasei Group, such as fibers, chemical products, and construction materials. Considering sustained business expansion, it was determined that operation of the business under Teijin Frontier, which combines trading company functions having strong global procurement capabilities and manufacturing functions to develop and produce high-performance fibers, providing unique solutions across a wide range of fields, including apparel textiles and industrial materials, would be the most promising path forward rather than pursuing independent growth for Asahi Kasei Advance.

The purpose of the integration announced today is to combine the business platforms, sales networks, and customer bases of Teijin Frontier and Asahi Kasei Advance to drive sustainable growth and maximize corporate value. The strengths of both companies will be leveraged to form a corporate entity with greater competitiveness and a solid foundation for growth, positioned for sustainable value creation.

Hangzhou Asahikasei Textiles Co., Ltd., a subsidiary of Asahi Kasei (China) Co., Ltd., which manufactures and sells textile products, will be transferred to Asahi Kasei Advance prior to the integration.

The effect of the integration on the consolidated earnings of Asahi Kasei is immaterial.

Corporate profile after the integration

  Surviving Company
1) Company name TBD
2) Location TBD
3) Name and position of representative TBD
4) Business field TBD
5) Paid-in capital TBD
6) Shareholders and percentage of equity Teijin 80%, Asahi Kasei 20%
7) Fiscal year-end TBD
8) Net assets TBD
9) Total assets TBD

 

Profile of Teijin Frontier Co., Ltd.

Representative Yasunari Hirata, President and Chief Executive Officer
Operations Manufacture, processing, sale, and import/export of polyester yarn and fiber, textiles, apparel products, automotive materials, construction and architectural materials, industrial supplies, lifestyle products, etc.
Location Nakanoshima Festival Tower West, 2-4, Nakanoshima 3-chome,

Kita-ku, Osaka
Employees 878
Establishment October 1, 2012

 

Profile of Asahi Kasei Advance Corp.

Representative Keiji Kasumi, President & Representative Director
Operations Product trading, manufacturing and processing, and services in the fields of textiles, chemicals, and construction materials
Location Sumitomo Fudosan Onarimon-ekimae Bldg., 17-21 Shimbashi 6-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo
Employees 553
Establishment April 1, 2015

 

Business Portfolio Transformation

Under its three-year medium-term management plan “Trailblaze Together,” Asahi Kasei is improving capital efficiency and accelerating earnings by converting past growth investments into tangible returns. To support this, the company is implementing structural reforms that channel resources to its key growth pillars—pharmaceuticals, critical care, overseas homes, and electronics.

Recent actions such as exiting methyl methacrylate (MMA) monomer and related businesses, and expanding capacity for Pimel photosensitive polyimide, demonstrate Asahi Kasei’s disciplined execution of this strategy and reinforce the foundation for sustained, profitable growth.

Posted: December 2, 2025

Source: The Asahi Kasei Group

Flexible Automation: Rieter’s Autoconer X6

Rieter’s new Cop Exchanger enables more flexible automation.

Rieter’s Autoconer X6 offers intelligent data analysis and improved ergonomics as well as flexible automation in package winding.

TW Special Report

Switzerland-based Rieter Ltd.’s winding machine Autoconer X6 Type V delivers on every front, according to the company. Equipping it with the Cop Exchanger, which automatically removes defective cops, means yarn quality is safeguarded, production seamless and operator workload reduced. The all-new compact design combines ergonomic comfort with enhanced safety features. Additionally, the Ring-Winder-Connect module enables targeted operator guidance to faulty spindles. It improves quality, reduces waste, lowers energy use, and enables preventive maintenance.

Customers with a high degree of automation rely on the Autoconer X6 type V with its direct connection to the ring spinning machine. The integration of Cop Exchanger and Ring-Winder-Connect increases process reliability and performance, while simplifying operation and data analysis.

Automated Cop Handling

The Cop Exchanger works based on the results of the spindle identification system SPID. This detects alarm cops with faulty yarn, as well as off-standard cops with below-average yarn quality. Additionally, sensors in the automation aggregates monitor processing status of the cops and detect those that cannot be processed, for example. Smarttrays and RFID technology enable an intelligent cop material flow. Based on collected data, the Cop Exchanger removes affected cops from the Smarttrays and replaces them with empty tubes. Cops are sorted into two boxes: one for cops that cannot be processed, one for lower yarn quality cops.

Maximum Process Reliability

The Cop Exchanger offers user-friendly operation and high flexibility. It has a large empty tube capacity and can process two lots — with identical tube lengths — in parallel. Its boxes are easy to change. The unique decentralized material flow enables flexible combination with the spinning tube stripper and the Color Check, ensuring correct tube assignment via tube color monitoring.

Space-Saving Design And Improved Ergonomics

The machine’s length has been reduced by 350 millimeters (mm) to 818 mm, improving space efficiency — even in 96-spindle machines. This is especially beneficial for integration into existing buildings. The compact design is based on sections with six or 10 winding units and a newly designed, space-saving energy unit.

Rieter engineers also have optimized the machine’s ergonomics. The operating height at the winding unit is now 80 mm lower, thus increasing the operator’s safety and comfort. In addition, the new color scheme aligns the Autoconer X6 with Rieter ring and compact-spinning systems.

Intelligent Data Analysis With Ring-Winder-Connect Module

The new Autoconer X6, Type V, is ready for advanced data analysis and management with the Ring-Winder-Connect module. It analyzes SPID quality data from the Autoconer X6 and data from individual spindle monitoring system ISM on the ring spinning machine. This enables targeted operator guidance to faulty spindles. Ring-Winder-Connect improves quality, reduces waste, lowers energy use, and enables preventive maintenance, according to the company.

2025 Quarterly Issue IV

2025 Quarterly Issue IV

The Jones Family of Companies, Humboldt, Tenn., has hired Eric Delaby as senior director of sales.

New York City-based nonprofit Accelerating Circularity has announced founder and current CEO Karla Magruder will transition to board chair, where she will continue to guide the organization’s strategic direction. As part of the transition, Eileen Mockus was named new CEO.

Jonathan Puckett was appointed CFO of Houston-based specialty chemicals company Orion S.A.

Ebert

New Zealand-based Nuyarn® has named Monica Ebert vice president, sales, North America.

Suominen Corp., Helsinki, has appointed Francois Guetat COO and a member of the Suominen Leadership Team.

Fruit of the Loom Inc., Bowling Green, Ky., has appointed Scott Daley senior vice president – Brands. He replaces Tony Iannuzzi who is retiring at the end of the year.

John Brearley was named president, Americas, for Paris-based Lectra.

Bjorkman

Brett Bjorkman was named CEO of Next Level Apparel, Torrance, Bjorkman Calif. He
replaced the founder Joe Simsoly who has retired.

Julian Sponseller has joined the direct sales team at Emigsville, Pa.-based Herculite Products Inc. as Western Regional Manager. Austin Barshinger was named the new Quality Supervisor at Herculite’s facility in York, Pa.

England-based Think Group recently hired Harriet Adams as development director, and Lance Bray as a key accounts manager.

Compression brand CEP Running, Durham, N.C., has named Marc Sylvester National Specialty sales manager.

The American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAFA), Washington, has promoted its senior vice president of Policy, Nate Herman, to executive vice president.

England-based Carrington Textiles has hired Kim Proctor as sales manager. She will focus on a portfolio of accounts and drive growth across flame-retardant, printed and workwear fabrics.

The Global Nonwovens Alliance (GNA) has announced its inaugural board members. GNA is a federation established by the Association of the Nonwoven Fabrics Industry (INDA), Cary, N.C., and Brussels-based EDANA the Voice of Nonwovens. Murat Dogru was appointed CEO of GNA. INDA representatives on the GNA board are Mark A. Thornton, The Procter & Gamble Co.; Mike Clark, Hollingsworth & Vose; Jodi Russell, The Clorox Co.; Paul Harmon, Magnera; Douglas Dowdell, International Paper; and Jaren J. Edwards, Everra. EDANA’s representatives on the GNA board are Mikael Staal Axelsen, Fibertex Personal Care/Innowo Print; Jörg Ortmeier, TWE Group; Giorgio Mantovani, Corman S.p.A.; Thorsten Habeck, BASF; Ulrich Hornfeck, Sandler AG; and Anke Renz, Essity.

Ackerman

Covation Biomaterials (CovationBio), Newark, Del., has appointed Steven Ackerman CEO.

Avery Dennison Corp., Mentor, Ohio, named Mariana Rodriguez vice president and general manager, Materials Group EMENA.

Chris Blakeslee was named the first independent board member of Unspun, San Francisco.

The Supervisory Board of the Germany-based Karl Mayer Group has appointed Lutz Wolf CEO of Karl Mayer Holding SE & Co. KG.

Boulanger

Sophie Boulanger is the new CEO of SRTX, Montreal, the company known for Sheertex tights.

Microban International, Huntersville, N.C., has appointed Shermon McMillan president.

The American Association of Chemists and Colorists (AATCC), Durham, N.C., awarded its 2025 Olney Medal to Dr. Karen K. Leonas, professor in the Department of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management at NC State’s Wilson College of Textiles; and the Harold C. Chapin Award to Barry P. Brady, AATCC board member and AATCC Foundation board member.

The Washington-based United States Fashion Industry Association (USFIA) named Michael Lambert executive director of Global Trade and Compliance.

2025 Quarterly Issue IV

SENSIL® By NILIT And ROICA™ By Asahi Kasei Collaborate To Reduce Apparel’s Footprint

MUNICH — December 1, 2025 — Rapidly transforming apparel into a lower-carbon industry requires collaboration, innovation, and creativity. In this spirit, SENSIL® by NILIT and ROICA™ by Asahi Kasei have collaborated to introduce the concept of a new fabric with less environmental impact, combining SENSIL® ByNature, a NILIT Biomass Balanced Nylon 6.6 yarn, and Biomass Balanced ROICA™ premium stretch fiber, both designed for high-performance apparel.

Both companies utilize textile raw materials created through the Biomass Balance (BMB) approach, which utilizes renewable feedstocks made from reclaimed and recycled organic waste that does not compete with food sources, nor need the use of land for its production.

  • SENSIL® ByNature is the first textile Nylon 6.6 yarn for apparel made using a Biomass Balanced renewable feedstock sourced from biogenic waste.
  • Biomass Balanced ROICA™ premium stretch fiber incorporates renewable raw materials in place of traditional fossil hydrocarbons. ROICA ™ will focus its Biomass Balanced (BMB) efforts at its Taiwan plant, the company’s key reference hub for BMB production.

Because BMB products are identical to traditional products, the resulting fabrics engineered with SENSIL® ByNature and Biomass Balanced ROICA™ retain the comparable comfort, aesthetics, and performance as their conventional counterparts. This means that apparel brands can integrate these environmentally conscious fabrics without redesigning collections.

The companies use Biomass Balance accounting and third-party certification to appropriately allocate the percentage of renewable feedstocks to their products so that brands and consumers can rely on the sustainability claims. In addition, the companies are certified under the International Sustainability and Carbon Certification Plus (ISCC+) system, ensuring rigorous control and transparency in renewable feedstock use across the supply chain.

This partnership will contribute to reducing environmental impact:

  • NILIT’s SENSIL® ByNature lowers greenhouse gas emissions by about 1.8 kg CO₂ eq per ton of yarn versus traditional nylon.
  • Asahi Kasei projects that the new ROICA™ Biomass Balanced stretch fiber, combined with manufacturing optimizations, will reduce CO₂ emissions compared to existing products. However, since production decisions have only just been made, exact numbers are not yet available.

When blended, SENSIL® ByNature and Biomass Balanced ROICA™ stretch fiber help designers create outstanding stretch fabrics that substantially reduce a garment’s environmental footprint, lessening reliance on fossil resources, supporting circularity initiatives through renewable inputs, and improving Life Cycle Assessment, while maintaining the premium look, feel, comfort, or stretch performance consumers expect.

Discover more about BMB technologies and experience the next generation of sustainable stretch apparel at ISPO Munich in Hall B1/308 ISPO BrandNew Area.

Posted: December 2, 2025

Source: NILIT

1...181920...2,598Page 19 of 2,598

Sponsors

Breaking News

Load more

Digital Issue

2025 Quarterly Issue Number IV

View Latest Digital Issue

FEATURED ARTICLES

© Copyright 2017 Textile Industries Media Group, LLC.