Cationic Pretreatments Of Cotton
							Fiber treatment before dyeing reduces environmental pollutants, increases dye
							affinity. Despite the widespread acceptance and demand for cotton apparel, there are
							still some significant problems remaining with the wet processing of cotton fabrics.Considerable
							amounts of harsh chemicals and hot water are required to properly desize, scour and bleach cotton.
							Once the fabrics have been adequately prepared, dyeing processes for cotton suffer from some
							serious environmental difficulties. The most convenient dye classes for cellulose direct dyes and
							fiber reactive dyes both require significant amounts of electrolytes to achieve even reasonable
							exhaustion rates. These water-soluble anionic dye molecules do not have strong enough affinities
							for the fiber without the presence of up to 100 grams per liter (g/L) of either sodium chloride or
							sodium sulfate in the dye bath. Once exhausted to the fiber, direct dyes have only fair
							washfastness with after-treatments. Since fiber reactive dyes will react with water as well as with
							the cotton fiber, as much as 50 percent of the dye is hydrolyzed and must be scoured from the
							fabric in order to reach acceptable fastness levels.A fiber treatment applied before dyeing that
							would leave the cotton fibers with cationic charges would seem to be a possible solution to both of
							these problems. D. M Lewis and X. Lei have reviewed this approach1, and recent work has used
							cationic pretreatments to achieve union dyeings of cotton/wool blends2,3.Until the mid-1980s, use
							of pigments to color textiles had been generally limited to pad applications because of the
							inability of pigments to exhaust to fibers. Since that time, a number of researchers have looked at
							cationic pretreatments of fabric prior to exhausting pigments4-6, and the process of exhausting
							pigments to garments has become important commercially7,8. 
							
							Figure 1. Diagram of process by which cationic polymers forma layer of cationic charges when
							applied to fiber surfaces. 
							Figure 2. Diagram of process by which reactants modifythe fiber by forming covalent bonds
							with the cellulosic fiber. Chemistry Of Cationic PretreatmentsThere are two fundamentally
							different types of cationic pre-treatments in use. The first type are cationic polymers that form a
							layer of cationic charges when applied to fiber surfaces (See Figure 1).The second category of
							cationic pretreatments involves reactants that modify the fiber by forming covalent bonds with the
							cellulosic fiber (See Figure 2). The presence of cationic charges on or in the fiber causes anionic
							materials such as direct and fiber reactive dyes to be strongly attracted to the fiber and to be
							held much more tightly than without the cationic charges.Many types of polymeric cationic
							pretreatments have been developed. Some of the chemistries employed include polyacrylates4,
							polyimidazoles, polyamideepichlorohydrin resins1, and polyamino condensates2. Their actual
							compositions for the most part are proprietary.Reactant cationic pretreatments are usually small
							molecules that can form covalent bonds with cellulose. Two examples of chemicals that have been
							studied are choline chloride4 and N-(3-chloro-2-hydroxypropyl) trimethyl-ammonium chloride9.  
							Figure 3. Diagram of modified fiber formed when choline chloride is reactedwith DMDHEU and
							catalyst in the presence of cotton.  
							Figure 4. Diagram of cationically modified cotton when
							N-(3-chloro-2-hydroxypropyl)trimethylammonium chloride is reacted with cellulose under alkaline
							conditions.  
							Figure 5. Diagram of end result when cationic pretreated cotton is pigment
							dyed. Application Of Cationic PretreatmentsCationic pretreatments have been applied to
							textiles in two general ways: padding and exhaustion. Polymeric pretreatments have been
							incorporated into durable press formulations2,4 applied to fabrics prior to dyeing. Garments can be
							treated with cationic polymers with an exhaustion procedure carried out just prior to dyeing5-8.
							The efficiency of this exhaustion treatment is directly affected by process parameters such as pH,
							temperature, time and agitation level.The goal of exhausting cationic polymers is to provide a
							uniform layer of polymer on the fabric surface. Excessive buildup of polymer on the interior
							machinery surfaces can occur if the exhaustion process is not carefully controlled. The surface of
							the fabric should be clean and free from contaminants such as wax and size in order to assure a
							proper pretreatment.Reactant pretreatments have been successfully applied to fabrics by pad
							applications3,4,9,10. At present, the most economical reactant pre-treatments are small
							water-soluble molecules that do not readily exhaust to cotton fabric. As a result, exhaustion
							techniques have not been utilized as extensively as padding procedures. Recent patents, however,
							demonstrate continued interest in application of cationic reactants to garments11,12.Cationic
							reactants have been attached to cellulose by several mechanisms. For example, choline chloride has
							been reacted with DMDHEU and catalyst in the presence of cotton to give a modified fiber according
							to the scheme shown in Figure 34.N-(3-chloro-2-hydroxypropyl) trimethylammonium chloride has been
							reacted with cellulose under alkaline conditions to yield cationically modified cotton directly10
							(See Figure 4).In all cases, uniform application of the cationic reactant to the fabric prior to
							chemical reaction with the fiber is essential. Unlevel dyeings are the inevitable results of uneven
							applications of cationic pretreatments. Pigment Dyeing Of Cationic Pretreated CottonExhaust
							dyeing of cationic pre-treated cotton with pigments is a three-step process:application of
							pretreatment (exhaust or pad);exhaustion of pigment; andexhaustion of a binder.Pigments intended
							for exhaust application to cationically pretreated fabrics are designed to be anionic or nonionic
							when dispersed in water. The exhaustion of these pigments is controlled not only by the pigment
							particles charge, but also by the pH and temperature of the dye bath, the length of exhaustion
							cycle and the agitation level in the dyeing machine.Polymeric binders are used to increase the
							durability (washfastness and crocking) of the pigment-dyed fabric. These binders are usually
							cationic in nature and are exhausted to the fabric by controlling treatment bath pH and
							temperature.The end result of this process is a multi-layered structure that can be represented by
							the diagram shown in Figure 5.The colorfastness of pigment-dyed garments is strongly dependent on
							the interactions among pretreatment, pigment and binder. Considerable development work is often
							necessary to arrive at a commercially acceptable product.A typical pigment garment-dyeing procedure
							is given in Table I. The procedure can vary depending on the machinery used and the specific
							pretreatment, pigments and binder chosen. Chemical suppliers will provide the actual
							details.  Dyeing Of Cationic Pretreated Cotton With Anionic DyesAdding cationic charges
							to cotton fiber greatly increases the exhaustion rate and exhaustion level of anionic dyes.
							However, this increased affinity can lead to unlevel dyeings unless the dyeing process is carefully
							controlled. The uniformity of the dye strike is influenced by the pH and temperature of the dye
							bath and the rate of addition of the dyes. Salt is not required for complete exhaustion, and much
							higher color yields (approxi-mately 25 percent higher) are seen. Afterscouring of reactive dyes is
							usually not necessary, and direct dyes do not require an aftertreatment to achieve acceptable
							washfastness. A typical procedure for dyeing cationic pretreated cotton with anionic dyes is
							outlined in Table II. SummaryPolymeric cationic pretreatments for cotton offer several
							advantages for the garment wet-process industry. Pigments can be exhausted to garments, allowing
							styling options not easily obtained by other processes. Existing equipment can be utilized for
							these pretreatments because the polymers exhaust to the fabric surface. Disadvantages to be
							considered are the fact that the procedure is a complex multi-step process, and often the
							lightfastness of anionic dyes is adversely affected by the pretreatment.Reactant cationic
							pretreatments for cotton also offer several advantages for the garment wet processor. Fiber
							reactive dyes can be used without salt, and the amount of unfixed dyes is greatly reduced.
							Significant energy savings can be realized by the reduction of the amount of hot water needed for
							the process. Currently, however, the most efficient way of applying reactant cationic
							pre-treatments to garments is a fabric application in which pretreated sewing threads are used with
							pretreated fabrics during garment manufacture. In addition, the dye procedure must be carefully
							controlled to ensure level dyeings.As the reduction of pollutants in textile wastewater grows in
							importance, interest in the use of cationic pretreatments for cotton can be expected to grow
							also. References1Lewis, D. M. and X. Lei, Textile Chemist and Colorist, Vol. 21, No. 10,
							October 1989, 23.2Cardamone, J. M., G. Bao, W. M. Marmer, R. L. Dudley and J. Bulan-Brady, Textile
							Chemist and Colorist, Vol. 28, No. 12, December 1996, 19.3Cardamone, J. M., W. M. Marmer, E. J.
							Blanchard, A. H. Lambert and J. Bulan-Brady, Textile Chemist and Colorist, Vol. 28, No. 11,
							November 1996, 19.4Harper, R. J., Jr., Journal of Coated Fabrics, Vol. 18, No. 4, April 1989,
							234.5Angliss, I. and R. Blair, Australasian Textiles, Vol. 10, No. 4, July/August 1990, 56.6Chong,
							C. L., S. Q. Li and K. W. Yeung, American Dyestuff Reporter, Vol. 81, No. 5, May 1992, 17.7AATCC
							Garment Wet Processing Technical Manual, 1994, 106.8Cotton Dyeing and Finishing: A Technical Guide,
							Cotton Incorporated, 1996, 74.9Rupin, M., Textile Chemist and Colorist, Vol. 8, No. 9, September
							1976, 54.10Patton, R. T., J. D. Kitchens and D. M. Hall, U. S. Patent 5,006,125 (1991).11Hall, D.
							M., T. M. Leonard, C. D. Cofield and H. W. Barrow, U.S. Patent 5,330,541 (1994).12Hauser, P. J. and
							S. G. Helfrich, U.S. Patent 5,667,533 (1997).
							Editor’s Note: Peter Hauser, Ph.D., is an associate professor of textile chemistry at North
							Carolina State University College of Textiles, Raleigh, N.C. His research focuses on
							high-performance chemical finishes for enhanced value textiles, indigo dyeing and denim garment wet
							processing, new textile processes to reduce costs and energy use and pollution associated with wet
							processing. Dr. Hauser holds several patents. He can be reached by telephone at (919) 513-1899 or
							by e-mail at peter_hauser@ncsu.edu.The original text of this article was presented at the Emerging
							Technologies and Trends in Garment Wet Processing Symposium, New Orleans. 
October 2000
            


