Home     News     Resource Store     Current Issue     Past Issues     Textile Resources     Buyers' Guide
    Career Center     Subscriptions     Feedback     Advertising     eNewsletter     Contact Us

September/October 2008

Cover

View Issue |

Subscribe Now |

Printer Friendly
Full Site

James A. Morrissey, Washington Correspondent
 

Textile Manufacturers Hit South Korea FTA Report

By James A. Morrissey, Washington Correspondent

US textile manufacturers are concerned about an International Trade Commission (ITC) report that predicts large increases in textile and apparel imports as a result of a proposed free trade agreement (FTA) with South Korea. While the ITC says much of the increase would displace imports from other countries, that is viewed as a double hit.

The report, mandated by Congress in order to help it assess the likely impact of FTAs on the US economy, says the FTA with South Korea will likely result in a $6.4- to $6.9-billion increase in imports from South Korea; and the bulk of that increase will be in textiles, motor vehicles and parts, and wearing apparel. The ITC says as much as 90 percent of the increase could be at the expense of other nations and will not directly displace US production and jobs.

Cass Johnson, president of the National Council of Textile Organizations (NCTO), says the report is not an accurate portrayal of the true impact of the FTA on the US textile industry. He says the “displacement” of goods from other countries would be highly significant in that it could be at the expense of apparel made in Mexico and the Caribbean, which have become major markets for US yarn and fabric. He says the report is a “flawed model” in that it does not take into account that secondary impact on US textile trade.

US Trade Representative Susan C. Schwab says the South Korea FTA is the “most commercially significant trade agreement the United States had concluded in over 15 years.”

However, it is under heavy fire from textile manufacturers, automakers and some agricultural interests, and Rep Sander Levin, D-Mich., chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee’s trade subcommittee, says he will oppose the measure because of its impact on the automobile industry. That could be a major stumbling block in the way of ratification amd likely would preclude approval this year and maybe forever.


October 2, 2007