Central American Trade Agreement Moving In Congress
James A. Morrissey, Washington Correspondent
The Central American -Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR) is moving through Congress on an uncertain course for textile manufacturers and the agreement itself. The House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee have held an initial round of hearings that underscored the vast amount of disagreement about the pact that would grant duty-free access to the US market for products from Costa Rica, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Guatemala and the Dominican Republic. Under procedures covering the legislation, Congress must either approve or disapprove of the agreement without the right to amend it.
At the moment, the role of textile lobbying organizations is uncertain. The National Textile Association and the American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition are flatly opposed to CAFTA-DR, while the National Council of Textile Organizations, which has expressed concerns about the agreement, does not have an official position. This could lead to a split similar to what happened in connection with the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Retailers and other textile and apparel importing organizations, while not entirely pleased with the agreement, are supporting it. They believe it will provide them with more flexibility in their sourcing of clothing and textiles.
At a House Ways and Means Committee hearing, the head of a manufacturing coalition that includes some textile companies launched a scathing attack on the agreement. George Shuster, CEO of Cranston Print Works, who, along with Roger Milliken ,CEO of Milliken & Company, co-chairs of the American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition, told committee members voting for CAFTA-DR is a vote for China and a vote against American manufacturing. Shuster, Milliken and other AMTAC officials have been highly critical of NAFTA, contending that it has not benefited US textile manufacturers, and they say CAFTA-DR will be a similar failure. In his testimony, Shuster said: "From surpluses before NAFTA we have gone to continuous deficits. Over this period, hundreds of US factories have closed and relocated south of the border in order to take advantage of low productions costs in Mexico." He said CAFTA-DR makes it easier for US companies to outsource high-paying manufacturing and service sector jobs by guaranteeing investment rights and access to the US import market. Charging that the CAFTA rule of origin requirements are riddled with loopholes that allow US duty-free treatment for the assembly of components parts from every corner of the globe, Shuster said CAFTA-DR is worse than NAFTA.
Meanwhile, House democrats accused Ways and Means Committee Chairman Bill Thomas and the acting US Trade Representative of excluding them from deliberations on the agreement. Committee Ranking Member Charles Rangel (D-NY) said the administration has refused to address labor and environmental issues that are being raised by democrats, and he warned that is discouraging bi-partisan support for the bill. House Majority leader Tom Delay (R-TX) has set a deadline of the end of May for the House to vote, but Speaker Dennis Hastert ( R-IL) has simply said he would like to see a vote soon. On the Senate side, republican leaders don't foresee an early vote, as they have encountered more opposition than expected, and they are seeking more time to lay the groundwork for a successful vote.