White Biotechnology And Modern Textile Processing


M
odern society expects biotechnology to be the answer for many worldwide problems like
depletion of energy sources, incurable illnesses and pollution, among other problems.

Industrial use of biotechnology, known as white biotechnology, is bringing about new products
and processes aimed at the use of renewable resources, as well as the application of green
technologies with low energy consumption and environmentally healthy practices.

Textile processing is a growing industry that traditionally has used a lot of water, energy
and harsh chemicals — starting from pesticides for cotton-growing to high amounts of wash waters
that result in waste streams causing high environmental burdens. As textile fibers are polymers,
the majority being of natural origin, it is reasonable to expect there would be a lot of
opportunities for the application of white biotechnology to textile processing. Enzymes —nature’s
catalysts — are the logical tools for development of new biotechnology-based solutions for textile
wet processing.

Though the focus on white biotechnology is a new phenomenon, the use of enzymes in textile
treatment has a long history. Biotechnology-based processes were applied nearly 2,000 years ago,
when microbes were used as aids in bast fiber-retting. The first enzyme application, as early as
1912, was the use of barley for removal of starchy size from woven fabrics. The first microbial
amylases were used in the 1950s for the same desizing process, which today is routinely used by the
industry. Since then, several other enzymes have been introduced for industrial applications; and
enzymes such as cellulases, catalases, laccases and pectinases are increasingly gaining a foothold
in the textile industry as improved application processes are developed. The use of enzyme
technology is attractive because enzymes are highly specific and efficient, and work under mild
conditions. Furthermore, the use of enzymes results in reduced process times, energy and water
savings; improved product quality; and potential process integration. Following is a review of
common enzymes currently used in textile applications.

 
deeptank
Deep tank fermentors are used to produce enzymes.


Cellulase For Look,

Surface And Hand Modification


Cellulase enzymes were first
introduced after decades of amylase usage as an industry standard for desizing processes. During
the 1970s, the popularity of denim garments increased as new garment wet processes changed denim’s
look and feel from the hard, dark blue garments used as workwear into soft and smooth fashion items
with an abraded look. Surprisingly, this look, first achieved by using pumice stones, also can be
attained using cellulase enzymes. Cellulases loosen the surface fibers of the denim garment so that
mechanical action in a washing machine breaks the surface to remove the indigo dye, revealing the
white core of the ring-dyed yarns. The first cellulase products for this application were
introduced in the 1980s, and today, most denim garments are “stonewashed” using cellulases, either
alone or in combination with a reduced amount of stones. The introduction of cellulases resulted in
increased washing capacity for the laundries, and reduced damage to garments as well as to washing
machines, in addition to diminishing environmental effects from pumice stone mining and disposal of
used pumice.

It also was realized that cellulase applications could be extended to surface and hand
modification of cellulosics. The small fibers or fibrils protruding from the fabric render a fuzzy
surface, and the gradual entanglement of fibrils results in the formation of pills when a garment
is worn and washed. Removal of surface fibrils improves fabric quality, keeping the garment in good
form for a longer time. The use of cellulases, combined with the synergistic action of the
processing machines, is effective in removing the fibrils, leading to permanent improvement of
fabric quality, including cleaner and smoother surface, softer hand and improved fabric drape. This
treatment, called biopolishing, is widely used today in garment processing and in batch processing
of woven and knitted fabrics. As today’s process needs a dwell time of 20 to 40 minutes in a
high-mechanical-action system, the challenge is to create a consistent, continuous biopolishing
process.

Cellulases have been used in the textile industry for approximately two decades for denim
stonewashing and biopolishing of garments and fabrics. The first generation of products was based
on the natural ability of certain microbes to degrade cellulose. In their growth environment, these
microbes excrete a wide variety of proteins, which work in several ways to break down cellulose.
The development of modern biotechnology brought tools with which scientists could create new,
better enzymes for specific applications. Using these tools, it has been possible to create a new
generation of cellulase products containing different kinds of protein molecules or molecule
blends, thus offering improved performance features compared to the naturally occurring enzyme
systems.

Genetic engineering was used to enhance the desired activities of the cellulase complex and
delete the undesired molecules. This work resulted in several patents with claims of improved
performance based on selection of the right types of cellulase molecules. Enzyme manufacturers were
able to come up with new products, which could be enriched in endoglucanase activity, deleted in
the exo-acting cellobiohydrolase activity, or even be based on a single type of cellulase molecule.
As different fabric types have varying susceptibility for cellulase hydrolysis, and different
enzymes vary in their aggressiveness, choosing the right type of enzyme is essential to optimize
the result on a certain fiber type. Figure 1 shows a good example of how different fibers perform
under the same biofinishing treatment conditions: Lyocell, which is an extremely strong fiber that
is resistant to cellulase hydrolysis, does not lose much of its strength after treatment; whereas
linen, which is highly susceptible to cellulase attack, can be destroyed easily by the same
treatment.

 
Page42

Catalse For

Sustainable Hydrogen Peroxide Removal





Today’s textile processing industry uses a lot of hydrogen peroxide for bleaching of greige
goods before dyeing or printing. After the bleaching process, the residual peroxide in the bath
needs to be removed before the fabric enters the dyeing process, as the presence of peroxide
changes the dye shade and causes an uneven dyeing result. Traditionally, peroxide removal has been
done using several consecutive rinses with plentiful water, or using reducing chemicals such as
bisulphite to break down the peroxide. Both methods are unreliable and call for high water
consumption. A more modern way to remove peroxide involves the use of a catalase enzyme, which
breaks down hydrogen peroxide into water and molecular oxygen. The advantage of this process is the
end products are natural to the environment and do not disturb the dyeing process. Also, the
catalase enzyme itself is very specific: When the peroxide is gone, the enzyme does not react with
anything else, and thus there is no need to remove or inactivate it. The use of catalases has been
the fastest-growing enzyme application in textiles in recent years.

The first uses of biotechnology for textile processing have encouraged scientists to further
explore the use of enzymes. Although the biggest market today is for the use of cellulases in denim
washing, there is a willingness to step out of the “denim box” in order to create applications that
would impact the whole industry. The use of catalases is a good first step towards this goal. It
simplifies the bleaching process — giving more reliability in peroxide removal, thereby
guaranteeing consistency for subsequent dyeing. The reductions in water consumption and wastewater
disposal further add to total process cost savings.


Pectinases For

Sustainable Cotton Pretreatment


Today, efforts within the textile
industry seem to focus on replacing traditional natural-fiber scouring processes with enzyme-based
solutions. As the purpose of scouring is to remove natural impurities — such as polymeric
substances like pectins, waxes and xylomannans, among others — from cotton or other natural fibers,
there are plenty of enzymes that can act on such impurities. Alkaline pectinase, which loosens
fiber structure by removing pectins between cellulose fibrils and eases the wash-off of waxy
impurities, is the key enzyme for a bioscouring process. Other enzymes including cellulases,
hemicellulases, proteases and lipases have been tested; but at present, the only commercial
bioscouring enzyme products are based on pectinases.

Compared to the conventional alkaline boil-off, an efficient bioscouring process provides
many advantages, such as reduced water and wastewater costs, reduced treatment time and lower
energy consumption because of lower treatment temperature. Moreover, the weight loss in fabric is
reduced, and fabric quality is improved with a superior hand and reduced strength loss.

However, there are several obstacles in the way of successfully commercializing the
bioscouring process, primarily its inability to remove motes — the remainders of cottonseed
fragments. Thus, a separate bleaching step would be needed after the bioscouring process. On the
other hand, the alkaline boil-off can be combined with simultaneous peroxide bleaching to
efficiently remove the motes. As motes are not acceptable on fabrics other than those that will be
dyed to dark shades, bioscouring will have limited usage unless a simultaneous mote-removal process
is developed.

Another limitation of pectinase treatment is that its efficiency varies with the quality of
fabric. As the enzyme does not break down waxes, a high-temperature treatment with surfactants is
needed for a sufficient degree of hydrophilicity to guarantee even dyeing or printing. The
enzymatic treatment also is limited to discontinuous processes, as the enzyme needs reasonably long
reaction times, and controlling its performance in a continuous process is difficult.

 
pectinase
A schematic of a cellulase molecule


Enzymes For Other Textile Applications


In order to create a successful bio-based pretreatment for fabrics, it would be essential to
develop an enzymatic bleaching process, which is being investigated. The group of enzymes called
laccases, or phenol oxidases, possesses the ability to catalyze the oxidation of a wide range of
phenolic substances, including indigo. Laccases alone are not effective as bleaching agents, but
need to be applied with a mediator molecule, which is the actual substrate of the laccase and which
mediates electron transfer from, for example, indigo to molecular oxygen. The first commercial use
of laccases in the textile industry has been in the denim-washing process, where laccase-mediator
systems have been used to reduce backstaining, enhance abrasion levels and bleach indigo. However,
it has not been possible to show bleaching effects with a laccase-mediator system on greige cotton.

Another approach for enzymatic bleaching would be creation of peroxide in situ. This
approach of using enzymes like glucose oxidase to create hydrogen peroxide from glucose and
molecular oxygen has been discussed in several scientific publications. In principle, it is
possible to use amylases to break down starchy sizes into glucose, and then oxidize this glucose
into gluconic acid and hydrogen peroxide in a combined desizing-bleaching process. This process,
however, does not seem to have reached a state of commercial feasibility.

Finally, peroxidases, which are able
to activate peroxides in mild conditions, have been studied for applications in textile bleaching
processes. However, their use has not shown a satisfactory bleaching effect so far.

An efficient biopreparation process should be based on a combination, preferably
simultaneously, of enzymes for desizing, scouring and bleaching in one bath. Success in developing
such a process would result in a simple process, including savings in water, time and energy
consumption. The environmental impact would be minimized by low to no use of harsh chemicals and
lowered waste burdens, rendering a fabric of higher quality.


The Future Of White Biotechnology

Today, white biotechnology is geared
towards creating new materials and biobased fuels from agricultural waste and providing alternative
biobased routes to chemical processes. These efforts could lead to the development of improved
enzymes such as amylases, hemicellulases or cellulases that could be used in the textile industry.
The possibility of leveraging innovations over industries could lead to new opportunities for
biobased textile processes. New enzymes with high specific activity, increased reaction speed, and
tolerance to more extreme temperatures and pHs could result in development of continuous processes
for bioscouring or biofinishing of cellulosic fibers. Development of other processes in the future
could also expand the use of enzymes on natural fibers into use on man-made fibers such as nylon
and polyester.


Editor’s Note: Anna-Liisa Auterinen is director, textile products, Genencor International BV,
The Netherlands.


May/June 2006

Arch Chemicals Launches Purista® In The United States

Norwalk, Conn.-based Arch Chemicals
Inc. now offers its Purista® textile freshness-enhancing treatment commercially in the United
States. According to the company, Purista, applied to fabric during manufacturing, protects fabrics
from odor-causing bacteria and offers a long-lasting “fresh finish.”

“The success of Purista freshness-enhancing treatment in the United Kingdom and Southeast
Asia, combined with new market research about the preferences of American consumers, indicates that
the US market is ready for this product,” said Peter Cowey, international business manager for Arch
Chemical’s textile treatment business.


May/June 2006

Trade Talks In Trouble As Deadline Passes

A top US trade official has expressed his disappointment that trade ministers at the World Trade
Organization (WTO) failed to meet an April 30 deadline to agree on how to proceed with trade
liberalization negotiations, which many say must be concluded by the end of this year.

Peter Allgeier, US Ambassador to the WTO, told a meeting of trade negotiators that failure to
meet the April 30 deadline was more than a disappointment; it raises serious questions about our
collective commitment to the Doha Round goals of significant liberalization and reform of trade
this year. Trade officials had set an April 30 deadline to complete the so-called modalities that
would set out the procedures for carrying out negotiations.

A new deadline of July 31 has been set, raising major concerns that it would not be enough time
to reach agreement on a wide range of agriculture, industrial and consumer trade issues.

The end-of-2006 goal to complete the negotiations is considered critical, as that would give the
US Congress time to ratify the agreement under the president’s trade promotion authority (TPA),
which expires in July 2007. Under TPA, what will likely be an intricate trade agreement can only be
given an up or down vote in Congress without any amendments permitted. With the present mood in
Congress with regard to trade, there is no assurance that TPA would be extended.

Both textile manufacturers and importers of textiles and apparel would like to see the Doha
Round move forward, but for different reasons. Textile manufacturers are braced for some tariff
reductions, but they hope the round would result in something more important to them – a
safeguard mechanism that would permit the imposition of import quotas where there is market
disruption or a threat of market disruption. Imports see the tariff cuts that will be proposed as
part of the Doha Round as a way to get the products they need at the best prices from a wide
variety of sources.

Looking at the new July deadline, Allgeier called for negotiators to get serious now and not
backload all the tough decisions until July through inaction. “We can bring the Doha Round to a
successful conclusion by the end of this year if we stay focused on the job at hand and make the
necessary decisions,” Algeier said. “We need to do this in the coming weeks. We do not have the
luxury of postponing decisions on agriculture and manufacturing modalities until the end of July –
we must start to see the shape of the overall package in July.” He added the trade ministers have
an enormous challenge in the days ahead.

However, he said the United States remains committed to the very highest level of success, and
it is prepared to exercise the will, devote the resources, provide the leadership and work with the
rest of the WTO membership.

May 1, 2006

Frontier, Cheraw Merge Businesses

Frontier Spinning Mills Inc.,
Sanford, N.C., and Cheraw, S.C.-based Cheraw Yarn Mills have merged their businesses. Cheraw now
operates as a division of Frontier, retaining its name and management team, according to Bill
Malloy, Cheraw’s vice president.

“We’re pretty excited about the merger,” Malloy said, adding that the two companies are a “
good fit” for each other. He explained that Cheraw spins open-end cotton, polyester/cotton and
polyester yarns for specialized, niche applications, while Frontier — which spins cotton and
cotton/blend yarns using open-end, air-jet and vortex machinery — is more volume-oriented.

Cheraw will retain all of its employees, who number approximately 165, and also plans to
install new equipment, Malloy added.

Frontier operates seven other plants in various locations in North Carolina and Alabama, and
employs approximately 1,500 people, not including those at Cheraw.

The merger with Cheraw comes on the heels of Frontier’s acquisition of the Columbus,
Ga.-based denim spinning operation of Swift Galey, an Atlanta-based apparel, home and hospitality
textiles manufacturer. Frontier will move the machinery from that operation to plants in North
Carolina, and will spin yarn for Swift Galey’s denim fabrics.


May/June 2006

Treasury Dept. Fails To Cite China As A Currency Manipulator

Textile lobbyists have reacted sharply to the US Treasury Department’s decision not to label
China a currency manipulator. The administration opted instead to continue informal discussions on
what is viewed by textiles and other industries as a serious currency undervaluation.

In a semiannual report mandated by Congress, the Treasury Department said there is not
sufficient evidence that China is manipulating its currency in order to gain an unfair advantage in
international trade. The report did note, “[F]ar too little progress has been made in introducing a
flexible exchange rate.” The sticking point is that in order to label China a currency manipulator,
subject to actions by the US government, it must be determined there is an intent to gain an
advantage. The report said the technical requirements for China to be designated a manipulator
under US law have not been met.

The report said that in July 2005, China abandoned its eight-year peg to the dollar and moved to
a managed floating exchange regime. Since that time, China’s currency, the renminbi, has
appreciated 2.6 percent against the dollar. US textile trade officials contend that current
exchange rate amounts to as much as a 40-percent subsidy for China’s imports. Despite the
discrepancy and a surging US trade deficit with China, the report says China continues to take
steps to create market infrastructure and financial instruments for floating currency. It adds that
China’s commitment to move to a flexible exchange rate is clear and has been repeated at the
highest levels of the Chinese leadership.

Textile industry representatives in Washington and congressional supporters sharply attacked the
report.

Charging that the US government kowtows to China, the American Manufacturing Trade Action
Coalition (AMTAC), which represents a wide range of manufacturers including textiles and labor,
said, “[D]ialogue with China is not enough; the US industry needs action now.”

 AMTAC Executive Director Auggie Tantillo stated: “The US trade deficit with China was $202
billion in 2005, and the US manufacturing sector has lost more than 2.8 million jobs since the
beginning of 2001. Rome is burning. How much longer will the US government fiddle while the US
industry bleeds?”

Rep. Robin Hayes, R-N.C., challenged the conclusions of the report and cited what he called the
devastating effect the exchange rate problem has had on the domestic textile industry. In a letter
to Treasury Secretary John W. Snow, Hayes said, “I wholeheartedly disagree with this report, and I
can tell you on behalf of the constituents of the 8th District of North Carolina and manufacturers
across the nation we want action against China now.”

Cass Johnson, president of the National Council of Textile Organizations, said China has shown
it won’t do anything until the US government shows there are consequences, and he called for
Congress to enact legislation that would levy punitive sanctions on China. Sens. Charles E.
Schumer, D-N.Y., and Lindsey O. Graham, R-S.C., have introduced legislation that would levy a
27.5-percent duty on China’s imports unless it reforms its currency. Although Schumer says he is
unhappy with the Treasury Department report, he is willing to postpone a vote on the bill until
September. There also is legislation in the House that would enable US industries to take punitive
actions against China. That bill has more than 150 cosponsors, but action is not expected in the
near future.

On May 15, the Bank of China permitted a slight increase in China’s currency against the dollar
in a move that Treasury Department officials say is evidence that diplomacy can work.

May 1, 2006

Globalization – A Win-Win Possibility?


M
any big thinkers throughout history have shaped ideas that form the foundation of
globalization. The bottom line for many steeped in economics is that unimpaired global free trade
will create an absolute economic nirvana. For them, international trade means international peace.
Through global specialization, total costs are lower around the world, and global economic
efficiencies are maximized. By ridding the world of tariffs and quotas, the free market’s invisible
hand will determine how much and where corn, sugar, cotton and wheat should be grown; where to
build airplanes and autos; and where medical tests will be evaluated.

Global standards of living will be equalized at a higher level than is found in today’s most
impoverished sections of the globe, and the highest will be lowered — but think: greater global
good. Rising standards of living will increase consumerism, which leads to the free flow of ideas,
which will grease the skids of free thought, which ultimately will lead to democracy.

The interconnectedness of the global economic framework will make it impenetrable to
nationalistic fanaticism because there will be no way to be an economic island in a global economy.

So, why cry foul?

Opinions vary, but one of the most straightforward is that while global growth continues and
gross domestic products rise, everything will be fine aside from the readjustments that occur
around the globe regarding entire employment and asset sectors — like textiles. Don’t worry, lower
labor rates for the displaced will be offset by lower-cost consumer goods as those workers do their
part for the greater global good.

The downside comes with the first hiccups that chill global growth. An oil, health or
political crisis — or any unexpected interruption to the underlying linkages at the foundation of
the global economy — could set off an economic storm the likes of which we have never seen.

As the supposed benefits of globalization raise the total economic benefit, the cost and risk
move beyond anything one nation has ever tried to control. Nation-based economic tools will become
obsolete, and the demand for greater economic safety nets comes at a time of reductions for many
such plans.

On a larger scale, can countries really suspend their national self-interest for the right to
become part of the integrated global economic fabric? Think of China’s announced 15-percent
increase in defense spending this year after rising 13 percent last year — or the US activities in
the Middle East or the knowns and unknowns throughout the Middle East.

Industries like textiles, autos, steel, agriculture and energy will all face the question of
being essential to an economic superpower. Retaining them through market management, such as tariff
and government programs, flies in the face of global free trade. National security, economic
sovereignty and the hunger for transnational corporate growth will continue to test the
eventualities of globalization and the realization that truly global free trade has some unintended
consequences. In the meantime, practice those old-time hiccup cures — they might be necessary
sooner than economists think.


May/June 2006

Collins & Aikman To Quit Automotive Fabrics Business

Troy, Mich.-based automotive systems
and cockpit modules supplier Collins & Aikman Corp. announced it will exit the automotive
fabrics business, pending approval by the US Bankruptcy Court. The action will impact approximately
1,200 employees in three fabric manufacturing plants in Roxboro, N.C., one in Farmville, N.C., and
a laminating plant in El Paso, Texas. It will be implemented over a transitional period depending
on when the business can be transferred to other suppliers.

The company is seeking a buyer for the El Paso operation, but it has abandoned efforts to
sell the rest of the fabrics business, according to David A. Youngman, vice president,
communications. He said the business has been unprofitable, and a turnaround is not projected.

“Despite an aggressive cost-cutting program, the business is projected to continue to be
unprofitable,” Youngman said, noting the company has invested heavily in technologies to produce
fabric styles, such as velour, that no longer are popular with consumers. In addition, he said, “
Sales have dropped from more than $300 million in 2004 to a projected $150 million in 2006, and we
have an extensive amount of excess capacity.”

Other factors in the business’s misfortunes include escalating raw material prices and the
transfer of manufacturing offshore, according to Gerald Jones, executive vice president, Fabrics.

The company’s automotive carpets business remains profitable, and is not included in the
decision, Youngman said.

“Our other automotive operations still offer value-added products. For example, there are
three automotive carpet plants in North Carolina and others elsewhere. That is one of our core
competencies, along with injection-molded panels and other products,” he said.

Collins & Aikman filed voluntary petitions to reorganize under Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection in May 2005. The company plans to complete the shutdown of its Fabrics business before
the end of September 2006, when it expects to emerge from bankruptcy. Youngman said the company
could emerge as a stand-alone company, or it could be sold. Among those parties who have expressed
interest in the company, he said, is New York City-based financier and chairman of the Greensboro,
N.C.-based International Textile Group, Wilbur L. Ross Jr., whose recently formed International
Automotive Components Group has acquired Collins & Aikman’s European businesses.


May/June 2006

Wellman To Up Polyester Staple Price

Wellman Inc., a Fort Mill, S.C.-based polyester product manufacturer, reports it will increase
the price of all polyester staple fiber by 3 cents per pound, effective June 4, 2006. The rising
costs of petrochemical-based raw materials led to the price increase, according to the company.

May 1, 2006

Ciba Develops MagiCarpet Jet-Printing System

Switzerland-based Ciba Specialty
Chemicals Inc. has introduced MagiCarpet, a carpet jet-printing system that includes dyes and
chemicals for all fiber types, and Ciba® Alcoprint® CT-DP thickener. Endorsed by Austria-based J.
Zimmer Maschinenbau GmbH, MagiCarpet was specially designed for Zimmer’s ChromoJet® printers. The
system is suitable for all finished carpet products including carpet tiles, rugs, mats and
wall-to-wall carpets. According to Ciba, Alcoprint CT-DP thickener allows brilliant shades and
maximizes fixation even at low pHs.


dpf


Ciba has introduced MagiCarpet, a jet-printing system for carpets, for use with Zimmer’s
Chromojet™ printer.



“[The system] allows carpet printers to make the most of all the advantages of jet printing,
including high flexibility in terms of fiber materials, production runs, design and end product,”
said Peter Otto, global head of Textile Effects marketing, Ciba.


May/June 2006

VDMA Releases 2005 Textile Machinery Export Figures

 The Textile Machinery Association of the German Engineering Federation (VDMA), Frankfurt,
reported the country’s textile machinery manufacturers exported machinery and accessories totaling
3.4 billion euros in 2005. Overall, exports declined by 5.3 percent for the year, but there were
significant increases in several markets, and the country remains the leading supplier globally of
textile machinery and accessories, according to VDMA.

Although Asia accounted for 46 percent or 1.6 billion euros of Germany’s textile machinery
exports, those exports declined by 7.6 percent. While exports to China were down by 27 percent,
that country remained the largest buyer of German machinery, with purchases totaling 742 million
euros and comprising 22 percent of Germany’s total exports. Exports to India, Iran and Pakistan all
rose considerably. India spent 232 million euros on German machinery, a 62.9-percent year-on-year
increase overall and up by 124.1 percent, 56.2 percent and 52.1 percent, respectively, for
spinning, weaving and finishing machinery. Iranian purchases totaled 89 million euros, up by 42.4
percent. Pakistani purchases grew by 31.1 percent, with specific increases of 98.3 percent and 42.7
percent, respectively, for finishing and spinning equipment.

Textile machinery exports to the Americas grew significantly to 587 million euros, accounting
for 17.2 percent of the total. Shipments to North America grew by 25.5 percent, with US purchases
up by 22.7 percent to 315 million euros. That figure represented 9.2 percent of total German
exports, the second-highest after Chinese purchases and the highest US total since 2001. In
particular, deliveries rose by 84 percent and 42.5 percent, respectively, for spinning and
finishing machinery. Exports to South America rose by 53.7 percent, and within that continent,
Brazil increased its purchases by 79.3 percent to 127 million euros.

Closer to home, Germany’s textile machinery shipments declined by 7.9 percent to countries
within the European Union and by 17.3 percent to the rest of Europe including Turkey, with a total
turnover of 1.1 billion euros or 33.3 percent of total exports. Turkish purchases accounted for 9
percent the third-largest portion by country of the total.

May/June 2006

Sponsors