Malden Mills Set To Be Acquired By Chrysalis Affiliate

Pending approval by the US Bankruptcy
court District of Massachusetts, Western Division, Lawrence, Mass.-based Malden Mills Industries
Inc. is set to be acquired by Pipevine MMI LLC, a newly formed affiliate of Philadelphia-based
turnaround investment firm Chrysalis Capital Partners LP, Firetip MMI LLC and Firetip II MMI LLC
(collectively, Chrysalis) for $44 million.

In January 2007, Malden Mills filed for Chapter 11 protection under the US Bankruptcy Code
in order to facilitate a sale to Boston-based turnaround investment specialist Gordon Brothers
Group, for $44 million
(See “
Malden
Mills Board Approves Sale To Gordon Brothers
,”)
. The sale was subject to higher and better
offers, and Chrysalis subsequently entered a competing bid, which ultimately was approved as the
stalking horse bid.

An auction had been scheduled to take place today. However, no further qualified bids were
presented to the court, and the auction was cancelled, leaving Chrysalis as the successful bidder.
The sale is expected to be approved during a hearing scheduled for tomorrow.



February 20, 2007

Dow To Up Oxygenated Solvents Prices

Effective March 1, The Dow Chemical
Co., Midland, Mich., will increase the off-schedule prices on several of its oxygenated solvents
products — including isopropanol, 2-ethylhexoic acid, 2-ethylhexanol, n-butanol, and isobutanol —
by 4 cents per pound.

“Due to the escalating costs for raw materials, the margins on our products have eroded to
unacceptable levels,” said Pat Gottschalk, global business director, Solvents & Intermediates. “
The only way to improve our margins is to increase the price of our products.”



February 20, 2007

American & Efird Continues Expansion With Foray Into Technical Textiles

Mount Holly, N.C.-based American
& Efird (A&E) is expanding into specialized technical textiles markets with new yarns,
twines and cords that can be used by the global mechanical rubber goods, wire and cable and
electrical motor manufacturing segments. End products include hoses; timing and conveyor belts;
power, control and fiber-optic cables; and engineered cords for motor manufacturing and repair;
among other products.

“We are greatly broadening our scope of market segments,” said Mark Hatton, global marketing
manager, Technical Textiles Division. “These segments include mechanical rubber goods, wire and
cable, and electrical motor manufacturing, among other high-performance markets requiring technical
textile products. With the acquisitions of Synthetic Thread Company in August of 2004, Ludlow
Textiles Company in March of 2005, and Robinson-Anton Textile Company in August of 2005, A&E
increased capabilities to design, produce and deliver technical textile products for these segments
on a global basis.”

Over the next few years, A&E plans to expand further into performance-driven technical
textiles segments.



February 20, 2007

Trade Official Outlines Bush Agenda

In testimony before the House Ways and Means and Senate Finance Committees February 14 and 15, US
Trade Representative Susan C. Schwab outlined the Bush administration’s trade agenda emphasizing
the need for more free trade agreements, a successful Doha Round of liberalization negotiations and
a push for greater exports. There was little emphasis on what US textile manufacturers consider
their most pressing problem — imports.

Painting a generally rosy overall economic picture, Schwab even saw the sunny side of a
record $763.6 billion trade deficit reported earlier in the week — an increase in exports.

Schwab told members of the trade-legislation-writing committees that a strong US economy is
due in part to the Bush administration’s trade policies. She said the economy grew at a rate of 3.4
percent — faster than Japan and the European Union — and that 2 million jobs were created over the
last 12 months. In 2006, the US textile industry lost 25,000 jobs, and apparel employment was down
by 12,700. She noted that real compensation in the United States has risen by 8 percent since 2001,
and consumer spending is up more than 17 percent in the last five years.

Schwab said productivity increases, technological changes and global competition “can lead to
increased opportunities for many workers.” With respect to those who lose their jobs as a result of
import competition, she said the president has asked for reauthorization and improvements to Trade
Adjustment Assistance, a program that provides job retraining and other assistance to workers
displaced by import competition.

Schwab said the continuation of trade-driven economic improvements is dependent upon
extending trade promotion authority (TPA) to the president. She said the president needs TPA in
order to negotiate regional and bilateral agreements to open markets for US exporters “to level the
playing field and to keep pace with US competitors.”

Members of the committee are skeptical of TPA and have indicated that even if it is approved,
it should include requirements for US trading partners to upgrade their working conditions and
environmental protection. Schwab said she is willing to work with Congress on those issues.

Rep. Sander M. Levin, D-Mich., chairman of the House Trade Subcommittee, questioned Schwab’s
emphasis on exports to the exclusion of addressing import problems. He said: “What about imports?
What about people losing factory jobs?” Schwab responded by saying, “Imports do matter,” and she
pointed out that adjustment assistance will be available to “the fewer than 3 percent of the
workers who may have been laid off due to import competition or overseas relocation.”



February 20, 2007

Software Donation To NCSU Expected To Benefit Nonwovens Industry

The North Carolina State University
College of Textiles, Raleigh, N.C., has received a donation of software valued at more than $1
million from Carlsbad, Calif.-based Alignent Software. Alignent’s Vision Strategist roadmapping
software is expected to be particularly useful for projects conducted at the college‘s Nonwovens
Cooperative Research Center (NCRC) to develop interactive technology roadmaps — all-encompassing
strategic plans developed based on predetermined goals — for the nonwovens industry.

The college notes there are a number of considerations that go into developing a technology
roadmap for nonwovens businesses. These include infrastructure, workforce and technology needs for
continued growth; as well as such issues as landfill and waste disposal problems, the need to
develop non-petroleum-based raw materials that are environmentally sustainable and multifunctional,
global competition and others.

Helmut Hergeth, Ph.D., an associate professor in the Textile and Apparel Technology and
Management Department, College of Textiles, said the roadmapping program is being set up within the
textile management area and could benefit any sector of the US textile industry, although the
medical nonwovens area seems to hold the most promise. He said proposals have been sent out in an
effort to find sponsorship for specific projects.

“Medical nonwovens is an interesting field,” Hergeth said. “It’s fairly new and growing, and
development comes from very different areas. Putting together a roadmap with input on all those
levels should be more helpful than in an industry where development comes only from one area.”

San Clemente, Calif.-based Roadmapping Professionals Inc. will provide training and startup
assistance for the project.

Under the program, textiles researchers and industry leaders will collaborate using the
roadmapping process to determine how technology can help the industry grow. They also will develop
technology and product concepts and execute a strategy to bring them to fruition. The roadmapping
software will help them manage information gathered through various inputs and generate reports
that provide an overview of the current situation, and formulate a plan for moving ahead.



February 13, 2007

Trade Deficit Hit Record Level In 2006

The US Department of Commerce today
reported a record trade deficit of $763.6 billion in 2006: Trade with China accounted for $232.5
billion of that; and textiles and apparel $83 billion. Of the textiles and apparel deficit, China
accounted for $29.6 billion — an increase of 17 percent over 2005. The increase in the overall
trade deficit occurred despite a 12.75-percent increase in exports.

Manufacturing trade associations immediately claimed the deficit is an example of “broken US
trade policy.”

“Our escalating US trade deficits and concomitant loss of 3 million US manufacturing jobs
are a direct outgrowth of US trade policy,” said Auggie Tantillo, executive director of the
Washington-based American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition. “The government’s refusal to use
access to the US market as trade negotiation leverage gives other countries like China a green
light to subsidize and protect their industries to the detriment of US producers.” He warned the
offshoring of key US manufacturing will only accelerate unless Congress forces changes in trade
policy.



February 13, 2007

TenCate Named Exclusive North American Distributor For Owens Corning’s TruPave®

TenCate Geosynthetics North America,
Pendergrass, Ga., has entered into an exclusive partnership with Toledo, Ohio-based Owens Corning
whereby TenCate will sell, market and distribute Owens Corning’s TruPave® Engineered Paving Mat in
North America. TenCate includes TruPave, a recyclable composite fiberglass/polyester fabric that
remains stable up to 495°F, in its asphalt interlayer program.

“The partnership combines TenCate Geosynthetics’ wealth of experience and technical support
in pavement restoration with Owens Corning’s unique technology and expertise in the manufacturing
of glass/polymer-based pavement reinforcement fabrics,” said Paul Wei, nonwovens technologies
market manager, Owens Corning.



February 13, 2007

Government Officials Move On China Trade

Government officials last week moved on two fronts to attack the United States/China trade deficit.
The US Trade Representative filed a complaint with the World Trade Organization (WTO) charging
illegal subsidies, and members of Congress introduced punitive tariff legislation to offset what
they say is China’s illegal currency manipulation. The US trade deficit with China currently is
about $220 billion with $27 billion in textiles and apparel.

In the WTO complaint, US Trade Representative Susan C. Schwab charged China is employing
several subsidy programs to give its industries an unfair advantage in international trade. Among
the issues cited are export subsidies and tax policies that the US government contends work against
fair competition with US and other foreign firms. “We are committed to challenging China’s
WTO-inconsistent practices that harm American workers and manufacturers,” Schwab said. “China’s use
of market-distorting subsidies creates an uneven playing field, and we are seeking to level the
playing field to allow US manufacturers to compete fairly with Chinese firms.”

The complaint triggers a 60-day period in which the two countries can attempt to negotiate
their differences. If that fails, and it likely will, a WTO panel will be convened to determine
what actions, if any, need to be taken. If the United States prevails, it would be allowed to
employ sanctions against China.

In a related development, US Reps. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., and Tim Ryan, D-Ohio,
re-introduced their legislation that defines currency manipulation as an illegal trade subsidy, and
permits US workers and manufacturers to seek relief against imports from China and other countries
that regulate the value of their currencies. US textile manufacturers contend China’s currency
policies amount to as much as a 40-percent subsidy for its exports to the United States. In
introducing the legislation, Hunter said: “China is cheating on trade. Through the artificial
regulation of its currency, China is strengthening its manufacturing base and increasing America’s
trade deficit at the expense of our manufacturers. This is unacceptable and needs to be corrected
if American workers want to stay competitive.”

While recognizing there is a problem, Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. is opposed to
legislation and has said he hopes to negotiate better terms with China. At a recent hearing before
the Senate Banking Committee, however, senators expressed impatience and urged the administration
to take a much more aggressive stance.



February 6, 2007

Battle Starts Over Trade Promotion Authority

Even before legislation that would
renew the president’s trade promotion authority (TPA) has been introduced in Congress, the battle
lines have been drawn with textile and apparel importers predictably on one side and domestic
manufacturers on the other. And the chairmen of the House and Senate committees that have
jurisdiction over trade matters are expressing their reservations about granting the authority in
its present form.

If it is not renewed, TPA — formerly known as “fast track” — will expire June 30. Under that
authority, the president can negotiate trade agreements that can only be voted up or down by
Congress without any amendments. Trade officials both here and abroad believe it would be
impossible to negotiate agreements without TPA, as Congress could pick apart any agreement with a
series of amendments.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., and Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y.,
chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, issued a joint statement in which they called for
major changes in any TPA authorization in order to protect US workers and manufacturers through
better trade enforcement, congressional consultation, and labor and environmental provisions in
future trade agreements.

While describing fast track negotiating authority as “vital to US trade,” the congressional
leaders said it needs to be a stronger tool in protecting US interests. “I see reauthorization as
an opportunity to address Americans’ legitimate concerns on trade with more vigorous enforcement of
trade laws and agreements with greater congressional consultation so that we can fight for workers
and businesses back home,” Baucus said. Rangel added that “trade negotiating authority is a
valuable tool for the administration, but it requires a great deal of trust, and Congress must have
some key assurances before it is willing to extend this leverage.”

Obviously, the administration is not going to get a blank check if TPA is approved, and that
is anything but a sure thing.

The American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAFA), Arlington, Va., strongly supports
renewal of TPA, saying it is “extremely important to expedite free trade agreements and allow
negotiators to operate effectively.” AAFA President and CEO Kevin Burke said, “Complex
international trade agreements cannot be negotiated after the fact by the US Congress.” He added
that the President needs the authority “without further delay.”

Textile manufacturers and other US industries don’t like fast track, and they say it should
not be renewed.

Charging that TPA is a “blank check” Congress gives to the administration, Auggie Tantillo,
executive director of the Washington-based American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition (AMTAC),
said current trade policy has been a “fast track to massive manufacturing job losses.” He added: “
TPA is Congress’ way of passing the buck to avoid accountability. By stifling meaningful debate and
all amendments, TPA perverts the legislative process by effectively preventing negatively affected
industries and interests from airing their concerns in Congress.”

The US Business and Industry Council (USBIC) called for a moratorium on new trade agreements
until the US trade deficit is brought under control and “balance is restored to the world trading
system.” The Washington-based organization, which includes textile manufacturers, said when the
United States considers new trade agreements, they should be made “as the Constitution requires,”
with input from domestic interest through their elected representatives.

On the eve of introduction of the legislation, US Trade Representative Susan C. Schwab
issued a lengthy statement extolling the virtues of free trade. “In countries and regions
throughout the world, the United States’ global economic leadership continues to create more and
better jobs for Americans, achieve market gains for US exporters, generate economic growth and
development opportunities for our free trade partners and enhance choice and purchasing power for
US consumers, farmers and business.”



February 6, 2007

Importers Attack Vietnam Monitoring Program

The New York City-based United States
Association of Importers of Textiles and Apparel (USA-ITA) has blasted the Bush administration’s
plan to closely monitor imports of five “sensitive” categories of apparel from Vietnam and urged
the Department of Commerce (DOC) drop the plan, because no apparel manufacturers support it. The
department says it plans initially to monitor imports of trousers, shirts, sweaters, underwear and
swimwear as part of a commitment to determine whether Vietnamese imports are disrupting the US
market illegally. The monitoring program has the strong support of US textile manufacturers, who
contend Vietnam has a long history of disrupting markets with illegally dumped goods.

The Bush administration committed to the monitoring program as part of a deal made with US
Sens. Elizabeth Dole, R-N.C., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., who during the past session of Congress
were blocking approval of permanent normal trade relations (PNTR) status for Vietnam. PNTR was an
essential step in clearing the way for Vietnam to join the World Trade Organization.

In comments filed with the DOC, the Washington-based National Council of Textile
Organizations (NCTO) said that “at a minimum” the DOC should closely scrutinize the sensitive
import categories, and it should monitor others as data warrant. “Given Vietnam’s track record, it
is highly likely that dumping will indeed occur,” the NCTO filing said.

Textile and apparel importers are not buying into that at all. Describing the monitoring
program an attempt by the US yarn and fabric industry to “divert attention from its own
anti-competitive agenda,” USA-ITA Executive Director Laura E. Jones said: “The government knows
that the support for this apparel monitoring program comes solely from the US textile industry,
which doesn’t make apparel and has no business speaking for apparel. In fact in some 20 written
comments submitted to the Commerce Department, there was not one from a US apparel producer
favoring monitoring.”

Jones said the process is “entirely backwards,” and that the first step should be to
identify whether there are any US apparel makers that compete with apparel imports from Vietnam.
She charged the government “shot first” and only now is asking questions, and she warned that US
retailers and consumers will pay the price.



February 6, 2007

Sponsors