Home    Resource Store    Past Issues    Buyers' Guide    Career Center    Subscriptions    Advertising    E-Newsletter    Contact

More From The Editor

The Quantum Group: Innovation Honoree
November 23, 2015

ITMA 2015: Finally
September 22, 2015

L.A.'s Apparel Industry At Risk?
July 19, 2015

AAPN's Meeting Became A Conference
May 19, 2015

Textiles On The Move
March 16, 2015

Textile World Photo Galleries
November/December 2015 November/December 2015

View Issue  |

Subscribe Now  |


From Farm To Fabric: The Many Faces Of Cotton - The 74th Plenary Meeting of the International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC)
12/06/2015 - 12/11/2015

Capstone Course On Nonwoven Product Development
12/07/2015 - 12/11/2015

2nd Morocco International Home Textiles & Homewares Fair
03/16/2016 - 03/19/2016

- more events -

- submit your event -

Printer Friendly
Full Site
From The Editor

TPP Effect Hinges On Yarn-Forward Rule

James M. Borneman, Editor in Chief

If you are in the textile business and you haven't paid much attention to the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations, it might be worth a moment of your time to get familiar with what could be a serious blow to U.S. textiles. The pact includes the U.S. and 10 trading partners — Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam — and grants  duty-free access to the U.S. economy.

The major sticking point for U.S. textiles is a move by Vietnam to insert new rules of origin and abandon the historic use of the yarn-forward rule, a basic policy that has been part of every U.S. textile trade agreement. The Vietnamese rules would allow Vietnam to buy Chinese fabrics, transform them into garments and ship them into the U.S. duty-free. This isn't allowed in any current U.S. free trade agreement. CAFTA-DR members who are buying U.S.-made yarn to comply with CAFTA-DR yarn-forward rules should be outraged.

A recent article in The Hill reports that 167 House lawmakers recently signed a letter that "expresses concerns about positions taken by the Vietnamese government in the textile negotiations that could have significant negative effects on the textile industry here and its export partners." The article goes on to say, "Vietnam predicts that under the new rule, its market share in the U.S. would rapidly increase from 7 to nearly 30 percent."

Another concern is the level of secrecy under which the negotiations have taken place. There is much more concern reported in the foreign press than has been reported in the U.S. — but maybe that is the intent. Rumor has it that there is much more to the agreement than duty-free access, but time will tell. The National Council of Textile Organizations (NCTO) has been very vocal in support of the yarn-forward rule. Recently, Smyth McKissick, CEO of Alice Manufacturing Co. Inc., testified on behalf of NCTO in front of the U.S. House Committee on Small Business's Economic Growth, Tax and Capital Access Subcommittee. His testimony paints a clear picture of the state of the industry and potential damage that changing the rules would cause.

One has to wonder how a capital-intensive business like textiles is so easily bandied about. Walmart has come out with a commitment to buy more U.S.-made textiles. There has been significant investment and modernization in the U.S. industry.  Trading partners like TexOps in El Salvador and the other investors in that country's "Environmental Valley" are investing in a very special supply chain with solutions for synthetic-yarn-based high-end performance apparel. This takes courage when, in a far-flung country, behind closed doors, the rules may change and have a negative impact on those investments.

You don't need a master's degree in economics to understand the primary drivers of business and jobs. It's simple: Promote an environment of fair competition and provide a level of certainty for investors, focus on innovation, and bring quality products to market. If  Vietnamese goods surge from 7 to 30 percent — who really wins, and who really loses? U.S. textiles?

July/August 2013