For Textiles, 2010 Could Be A Busy Year In Washington
James A. Morrissey, Washington Correspondent
For many U.S. manufacturers, one of the most immediate priorities is the extension of duty-free treatment to a wide range of imported components that are not produced in this country. Textile manufacturers have a laundry list of such components that includes such things as acrylic and rayon yarns, and animal hair and other noncompetitive products. Congress failed to act on the miscellaneous tariff bill during last year's session, and, as a result, the existing duty suspensions expired December 31. In the waning hours of last year's session of Congress, the bill was blocked by Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., who said the basic purpose of the tariff concession legislation was being subverted by the inclusion of finished products that are made in this country. While U.S. textile manufacturers agree in principle with what she was doing, they are concerned that her action raises the costs of imported components, and that will make their products less competitive until duties are once again suspended. In view of the overall support for the tariff concessions, Congress could act on the bill fairly soon.
Trade Preference Agreements
Congress and the Obama administration are expected to look at ways to improve and revise the many trade preference programs (TPAs) that the United States has with a number of countries. The House Trade Subcommittee is soliciting comments on its plans to assess the operation, impact and future course of TPAs. The United States currently has regional TPAs with countries in Central America, the Caribbean, Africa and Asia; and also with Canada and Mexico. In addition, it has a General System of Preferences (GSP) that covers 131 countries.
The National Retail Federation (NRF) has proposed a 10-year extension of the GSP special duty treatment and has recommended for the first time that textiles, apparel and footwear be included, a move that is opposed by U.S. textile manufacturers. NRF and other importers of textiles and apparel believe extending or making permanent the GSP authorization would make long-term planning easier.
A majority of House Democrats, 129, and four Republicans have signed on to legislation calling for a major review and sweeping changes in both existing and future TPAs. A similar bill is pending in the Senate. Both bills place emphasis on economic results, enforcement and compliance; and set out additional criteria for such things as overseas human and labor rights, environmental considerations, national security and product safety. The legislation would give Congress much more involvement and oversight in connection with trade agreements by replacing the president's current Trade Promotion Authority, known as "fast track," with a requirement for the administration to certify to Congress, in advance of any agreement, that a proposed pact meets the mandatory negotiating objectives in the bill. And it would require periodic performance reports.
The outlook for trade agreements with Colombia and South Korea, negotiated by the Bush administration and awaiting congressional ratification, remains in doubt. President Barack Obama has made strong appeals for both to be ratified. Some efforts to resolve problems with the Colombia pact have been made recently, but they may not have gone far enough yet to satisfy Congress. Textile manufacturers support the Colombian pact because it has a strict rule of origin and offers export opportunities for yarns and fabric. Opposition to the South Korean agreement is much stronger. U.S. textile manufacturers flatly oppose it, as do U.S. automobile and agriculture interests, which are concerned about lack of market access.
Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., and Ranking Republican Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, of the Senate Finance Committee have introduced customs reform legislation, which they say is designed to promote legitimate trade but crack down on illegal shipments into the United States. They contend that U.S. Customs and Border Protection in recent years has concentrated most of its resources on the agency's national security mission at the expense of trade. Their bill calls on Customs to prioritize customs enforcement and at the same time devote more resources to facilitating legitimate trade. It provides for creation of two high-level positions whose responsibilities will be to upgrade enforcement and trade facilitation. The National Council of Textile Organizations, which for years has been pressing for more resources to be devoted to cracking down on illegal trade, supports the bill, pointing out that the textile sector attracts more fraud than any other industrial product sector. NRF, whose members are the largest importers of textiles and apparel, also supports the legislation, saying it believes the bill "strikes a balance" between the agency's trade and homeland security duties.
China Trade Issues
Although the U.S. trade deficit with China remains a major issue, not many people in Washington or Beijing see much happening here. Leaders of both countries are strongly committed to avoiding what could be construed as protectionist measures. Members of Congress and lobbyists for textiles and other import-impacted industries repeatedly point to what they see as China's currency manipulation and other illegal subsidies, and they have introduced legislation to address those issues.
The Obama administration for the most part is opposed to going the legislative route. The U.S. government has made some use of its trade remedy laws by imposing tariffs on Chinese tires and steel pipes, and other cases are pending. Lobbyists for textile manufacturers believe their best course for relief most likely is to use anti-dumping and countervailing duty laws, and they are gathering data and exploring possibilities in that area of relief.
The Obama administration has taken the position that the best course for dealing with Chinese trade issues is through diplomatic engagements rather than legislation or other stronger tactics. The administration believes China has been a strong partner in efforts to overcome the worldwide economic crisis, and it is not about to pick a fight.
Global Trade Agreements
The Obama administration has announced plans to move forward with a Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement with Australia, Brunei, Chile, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam. Though discussions are just beginning and any agreement has a long way to go, U.S. textile manufacturers are up in arms about including Vietnam, which they view as "another China." They say Vietnam has a nonmarket economy that manipulates its currency, relies heavily on exports for growth and has a rising trade deficit with the United States. While admitting Vietnam could be a problem, U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk says he hopes Vietnam could be brought into a "high standard" agreement.
On another front, leaders of the World Trade Organization are making what may prove to be a last-gasp effort to revive the Doha Round of trade liberalization negotiations in the coming year. The U.S. government remains committed to it, but the developing and developed countries remain far apart, and the outlook for a successful conclusion is anything but bright.
Consumer Product Regulation
Congress seems committed to giving a rejuvenated Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) additional funds and staffers to crack down on unsafe products, particularly those intended for use by children. It has authorized $118.2 million for the coming fiscal year - an increase from $105.4 million authorized in 2009 - and has promised annual increases for the next five years. Most of the CPSC's additional resources will be directed at toys and other products used by children, but it is possible the commission later this year could act on a pending national upholstered furniture flammability standard. In addition, the commission could continue the process for writing a flammability standard for bedding that has been under consideration for some time.