Doing More With Less
While nanotechnology offers promise for improving products, the term can be misused, and risk assessment guidelines are still evolving.
By Janet Bealer Rodie, Associate Editor
anotechnology in its various iterations would seem to hold the promise of being the miracle
cure for many of the worlds problems. In the world of textiles, it may be used to change the
behavior of fibers and fabrics by incorporating performance characteristics into them without
changing the hand or other intrinsic properties of the material. Such characteristics include
stain-resistance and release, moisture-wicking, antistatic, and antimicrobial properties
characteristics traditionally added to fabrics by the use of coatings, which can wear off and so
are not as durable.
There also are more highly technical applications, as when carbon nanotubes are assembled into
yarns or sheets or incorporated into a polymer matrix to add strength, dimensional stability and
conductive properties. Nanofibers may be produced to make a nonwoven substrate, such as a tissue
scaffold on which to grow new skin, or for numerous other applications including filtration,
composites, wipes, radio frequency identification and protection from chemical and biological
agents. Some of these developments have been reported in past issues of
A growing number of products are touting the benefits of nanotechnology, but its environmental, health and safety (EHS) implications are not always well-understood. Concerns about the possible risks from exposure to nanomaterials have led to calls for the development of criteria and test methods to analyze the EHS effects of manufacturing processes, wearing off or degradation of these materials, absorption into the skin, and other issues; and some guidelines while still works in progress are now emerging (See sidebar).
"Everything ultimately works at the molecular level for example, wrinkle-free resins using small-molecule chemistry that cross-links cellulose and makes it wrinkle-free. Thats not really nanotechnology based on the definitions of the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) or ASTM International," said William Ware Jr., senior vice president, research and development, at Oakland, Calif.-based Nano-Tex Inc. "Its a constant battle. Theres lots of stuff out there and people are talking nanotechnology without much pushback."
The NNI a federal research and development program established in 2001 to coordinate the nanotechnology-related activities of 26 federal agencies defines nanotechnology as "the understanding and control of matter at dimensions of roughly 1 to 100 nanometers [nm], where unique phenomena enable novel applications." To be true nanotechnology, materials behave at the nanoscale 1 nm equals 1-millionth of a millimeter in ways not observed at a larger scale, and those behaviors enable new applications that would not be possible at a larger scale.
According to Daniel J. Hayes, Ph.D., director of operations and a founder of NanoHorizons Inc. a State College, Pa.-based company established in 2002 to develop solutions based on nanotechnology licensed from Pennsylvania State University materials engineered at the nanoscale are engineered to have a particular property or for a particular reason. In his view, nanotechnology is focused more on material synthesis than on, say, molecular biology, biochemistry and related fields.
Part of the trick to getting application of these technologies into fabric is to make the system work in the conventional textile industry today, Ware said. We've been able to do that so you don't need to buy new equipment. Its all water-based and safe for workers, the environment and consumers; and the costs are reasonable.
Nano-Tex founded in 1998 to develop consumer-focused textile applications using nanotechnology, and the first company to offer such solutions to the textile industry currently offers four "nanofinishes" for a range of natural and man-made-fiber apparel, home textile and upholstery fabrics: Resists Spills; Repels & Releases Stains; Resists Static; and Coolest Comfort moisture-wicking.
Ware said the finishes are "smart" polymer systems that provide better benefits using less material than traditional fabric treatments. 'We get them to behave so that they self-assemble on the surface and make essentially a monolayer on the surface. The nanoscale is the thickness of that layer definitely less than 100 nm and generally less than 50 nm. The polymers are permanently chemically bonded to the surface of the fiber. "
The Nano-Tex finishes are applied to processed fabrics rather than integrated into the fiber. "From the processing standpoint it makes much more sense to do it at the fabric stage," Ware said. "We're modifying the surface of the textile. If done in fiber form, that finish needs to be compatible with all the other things that need to happen in fiber processing to make the process easier. Its much cleaner to do it at the end."
In the case of NanoHorizons' SmartSilver antimicrobial treatment, silver nanoparticles measuring less than 15 nm in diameter and added at the fiber stage provide the performance. "The nanoparticles are in a form that can be added during polymer extrusion, or they are formulated in the same way as a dye for natural fibers," Hayes explained. The silver is covalently bonded permanently to natural fibers at the same reactive sites to which dyes attach.
In addition to treatments for man-made fibers including nylon, polyester and polypropylene; cotton; and rayon, the company has developed a treatment for wool the first permanent antimicrobial treatment, it claims, for that fiber.
Arch Chemicals Inc., Norwalk, Conn., optimized its Purista® polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) antimicrobial treatment long established in nontextile applications such as swimming pool sanitizers, contact lens solutions and medical products for apparel and home textiles that are at least 35-percent cotton or rayon. Scott Brown, US technology manager, said Purista is ionically bonded to the fiber molecule.
"There are multiple binding sites on each molecule, so you get very tight affinity," Brown said, "noting the very uniform and efficient distribution of the antimicrobial across the treated fiber increases the probability that a microbe will come into contact with the agent. In contrast, antimicrobial agents that are applied in the form of relatively large particles are at a disadvantage in terms of microbial control, simply due to the reduced probability of microbial contact with the agent."
The academic community has served as an incubator for numerous nanotechnology advances. Once developed to a certain level, these technologies may be licensed by private companies such as NanoHorizons, as noted above, and Research Triangle Park, N.C.-based LaamScience Inc., to be further developed for commercial viability. LaamScience established last year to license light-activated antimicrobial nanotechnology developed collaboratively by Stephen Michielsen, Ph.D., associate professor at North Carolina State University's (NCSUs) College of Textiles, Raleigh, N.C.; and Igor Stojiljkovic, Ph.D., and Gordon Churchward, Ph.D., associate professors at Atlanta-based Emory University's School of Medicine now is developing product prototypes for a range of applications.
In explaining the technology, Michielsen, who also is chief scientist at LaamScience, said a 1- to 10-nm-thick surface treatment is covalently bonded to fiber surfaces. When exposed to light, the material acts as a photo catalyst to cause a chemical reaction on the surface that is toxic to microbes but harmless to humans. Michielsen said the finish is durable and continually regenerates. Activating light sources include typical indoor lighting as well as sunlight. The bonding process varies depending on the fiber, which could be man-made or natural.
The technology, unlike most other antimicrobial technologies, is particularly effective against viruses and has potential day care, nursing home and hospital applications, among others. "In the case of a major flu outbreak, this could potentially reduce the spread of infection by reducing the active virus that people inhale," Michielsen said.
One ongoing project at NCSU involves the use of nanofibers to make nonwoven tissue scaffolds for wound-healing applications. Russell E. Gorga, Ph.D., an assistant professor at the College of Textiles, is using the electrospinning process to create the scaffolds from a polymer solution with carbon nanotubes added in to provide conductivity and structural support.
"We wanted to make a conductive scaffold so that when we seeded the scaffold with cells, we could put a potential across the scaffold to try to induce cell differentiation and growth. We also thought we could give structural support to the scaffold itself because the nanotubes have very high moduli," Gorga explained.
The 10- to 15-nm-diameter nanotubes also provided unexpected perks. "If we put nanotubes in the solution, we get a much finer, thinner fiber structure, and we get more porosity so when we seed the scaffold with cells, the cells grow much better than they do in the same scaffold without the nanotubes," he said, adding that he now is designing electrical stimulation experiments to enhance cell differentiation and growth.
Gorga also is working with a scientist who can make nanotube yarns. "I have a student who is looking at putting the yarns into composite structures and looking at the properties compared with conventional carbon fibers," he said. "We're definitely excited about the potential to make really nice carbon nanotube yarn, and about some of the potential things we could be doing there."
Acknowledging the state of flux related to the determination and management of nanotechnology risks, Hayes believes there is no all-encompassing method of assessing the safety of nanomaterials.
"While nanomaterials present some new and unique phenomena, for the purposes of environmental health and safety, a lot of the existing tests are still applicable. Nanomaterials are not by far the smallest entities that are routinely tested and used in everyday life," he said, pointing out antibiotics, dyes and textile finishes as smaller materials.
"All nanomaterials are not created equally, and every nanomaterial has to be evaluated individually and in the context of its use patterns," Hayes continued. "If its carrying a drug that is critical for treating a disease that is not treated in any other way and can move it across the blood-brain barrier, then its very valuable. But when it ends up in places in the environment where its not supposed to be and harms animals by the same action, obviously its not valuable."
Michielsen would seem to concur with Hayes regarding nanotechnology risk assessment, at least where LaamScience is concerned. "Most materials we use are food additive-type materials," he said. "Because we're chemically bonding our treatment to the surface, we don't have the potential of passing between the cells of the skin, because the entire fiber would have to do that."
Purista's treatment has long been considered environmentally safe, according to Brown, who said processing liquid unused at the end of the day is used the next day. Whatever PHMB is released into the environment via wastewater binds to soil or sewage solids. "At that point, it has no environmental impact," he said.
As for concerns about carbon nanotubes in tissue scaffolds, Gorga said the nanotubes, which are rigid rods, are locked into the polymer in his tissue scaffolds. Even so, he is working with a toxicologist to assess potential harmful effects. He also said NCSU is considering establishing a center to evaluate nanoparticle EHS.
"We can make scaffolds that wont biodegrade, so the nanotubes would be trapped and would not leach out. Were talking about very low levels of concentration, embedded in a plastic substrate thats not leachable," Gorga said.
But the broader issue is we do need to think about EHS issues and address them in a more rigorous, fundamental research manner, he added. Ware said NanoTexs polymer systems do not present the same issues as nanoparticles. "Polymers, which are bound together, have a much better safety profile than nanoparticles, which are much more of an unknown. Polymers are inherently bound to the surface of the fiber and become part of the textile."
In addition, he said, "they use a lot less chemistry [material] than conventional technologies, so they're inherently better from the environmental standpoint, and they use less energy. From the worker safety standpoint, whenever we develop products we go through a full EHS protocol."
In the end, he said, "our name is on the end product, so its got to be safe."
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) of the Center for Disease offers a number of resources concerning the occupational safety and health issues related to nanotechnology. "Progress Toward Safe Nanotechnology in the Workplace," details work conducted by the NIOSH Nanotechnology Research Center from 2004 through 2006; and the institute's draft "Approaches to Safe Nanotechnology: An Information Exchange with NIOSH" makes recommendations with regard to safe practices in the workplace and seeks public comment for further understanding of the relevant issues.
The National Nanotechnology Initiative also offers a number of resources including articles and reports it has prepared as well as links to other publications, database resources and general information.
West Conshohocken, Pa.-based ASTM Internationals Committee E56 on Nanotechnology has released its first standard: E 2456, Terminology for Nanotechnology, and is developing others related to properties characterization and EHS issues including WK 8985, Standard Guide for Handling Unbound Engineered Nanoparticles in Occupational Settings.
New York City-based Environmental Defense and DuPont, Wilmington, Del., are developing "A Framework for Responsible Nanotechnology" to provide a system for assessing possible EHS risks related to nanoscale materials used in all application areas, and for documenting and communicating methods and parameters to address those risks. The final framework is expected to be released this summer.
The International Council on Nanotechnology (ICON), based at Rice University, Houston, and the universitys Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology have launched a monthly Virtual Journal of Nanotechnology Environment, HealthandSafety (VJ-Nano EHS) that provides links to peer-reviewed articles on the environment and health impacts of nanotechnology.
The Washington-based Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, a partnership between the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and the Pew Charitable Trusts, provides an inventory of current research related to the health and environmental implications of nanotechnology as well as links to other resources.
The ORC Task Force on Nanotechnology of Washington-based ORC Worldwide has prepared Nanotechnology Consensus Workplace Safety Guidelines, a table that provides selected peer-reviewed environment, health and safety reference materials and tools.