Home    Resource Store    Past Issues    Buyers' Guide    Career Center    Subscriptions    Advertising    E-Newsletter    Contact

http://www.textileworld.com/partners/Sr_Sales_Representative_Bolger_and_OHearn_Inc?override_sig=6d134c277189eb53ad63648042f76d28&override_token=b65bbcb705ed6642a8800553cd8f0acf
http://www.expoproduccion.mx/Content/Exhibitors/24/
http://www.LookChina.com
http://www.textileservicesonline.com
http://www.textileworld.com/Store/Books/index.html
http://www.textileworld.com/forms/newsletter.html
More Business & Financial

Improved Bottom Lines
October 14, 2014

An Improving Macro Picture
September 8, 2014

Fiber Costs: No Sweat
August 19, 2014

Midyear Assessment
July 22, 2014

A Long Look Ahead
June 17, 2014

Textile World Photo Galleries
September/October 2014 Sept/Oct 2014

View Issue  |

Subscribe Now  |

Events

73rd ICAC Plenary Meeting
11/02/2014 - 11/07/2014

Grading For Fit
11/03/2014 - 11/05/2014

International Textile Fair Dubai
11/03/2014 - 11/04/2014

- more events -

- submit your event -

Printer Friendly
Full Site
Business & Financial
Robert S. Reichard, Economics Editor

A First Look At 2005

By Robert S. Reichard, Economics Editor

T he first month of a quota-free textile world has passed without any major domestic erosion. According to the Institute for Supply Management, textile orders and production actually were up a bit over the last reported month.

Some impact on textile/ apparel trade and domestic mill activity is inevitable over the longer pull. But the way things seem to be shaping up, such changes should come slowly and gradually — buying time for US producers and distributors to adjust and maybe even prosper in this new global textile economy.

Wilbur L. Ross, chairman of the Greensboro, N.C.-based International Textile Group, of which the Burlington House business is a part, would seem to concur, noting his US plants are still profitable and he has no present plans to close any. Ross is taking advantage of the new trade ground rules by announcing a joint venture in China to make and distribute sheets and other home textiles. ITG’s partner, China Ting Group, will sell the goods in 25 Burlington House Retail stores in China (See “ Textile World News ,” TW , January 2005).

p14_Copy_8

Mill Appraisals

Cautious near-term optimism also is being expressed by other mill executives. Several feel that any really significant trade impact stemming from the recent ending of quotas won’t be felt for a year or more. Their reasoning makes sense, given such factors as normal order-production-delivery lags, the need for detailed long-term planning before making major changes, and continuing uncertainties as to how the United States and China will resolve still-existing disputes.

These factors must be considered before major shifts are made. The fact that most first-half 2005 orders already have been placed suggests few dramatic near-term demand changes. Since many companies already are finalizing their third and fourth quarter plans, this pattern could persist into summer and fall. Even going into 2006, few see shifts to just a single source like China; most agree it would be foolhardy to put all of a firm’s eggs in one basket. On the other hand, citing competitive pressures and the need to cut costs, companies do seem to anticipate a major reduction in the sources that make up individual supply chains.

More On The Chinese Impact

Uncertainties involving US imports of Chinese textile and apparel — aside from the all-your-eggs-in-one-basket caveat — would seem to call for some further comment. One thing is for sure, Uncle Sam is making it absolutely clear that the small, corrective steps taken recently by the Chinese are not nearly enough. Senior US officials have pointed out China’s recent imposition of export duties on selective textile and apparel products averages only 1.3 percent — far too small to have any meaningful impact.

Also increasing Washington’s concerns are the current huge Chinese trade surpluses and their impact on the US dollar, and a disturbing new study prepared for the US-China Economic Security Review Commission. The study finds more than 72,000 textile and apparel jobs were lost over the 1997-2003 period solely because of the US-China textile trade imbalance. Something is going to have to give, making further changes in US-China trade ground rules pretty much inevitable.

A Look At Profits

Taking a look at mill earnings performances, profits and margins are still nowhere near levels prevailing a few years back, but they’re still managing to stay in the plus column. The latest official government tally covering the first nine months of 2004 suggests that last year’s after-tax margin came to around 1.8 percent — pretty much unchanged from 2003 levels. These levels are likely to persist into 2005; at least that’s the opinion of Global Insight. Analysts for the economic forecasting firm, using gross operating profits as a measure of earnings, put the total for combined basic textiles and textile products at $19.6 billion. That’s just fractionally under the preliminary $20.8 billion level in 2004.

The same is true of apparel. Despite the ending of quotas, Global Insight sees 2005 gross apparel earnings reaching to near $20 billion — not that much under the levels estimated for 2004.

February 2005


Related Files:
Download Current US Textile and Economic Indicators.




Advertisement

http://www.staubli.us