Home    Resource Store    Past Issues    Buyers' Guide    Career Center    Subscriptions    Advertising    E-Newsletter    Contact

Textile World Photo Galleries
November/December 2015 November/December 2015

View Issue  |

Subscribe Now  |


From Farm To Fabric: The Many Faces Of Cotton - The 74th Plenary Meeting of the International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC)
12/06/2015 - 12/11/2015

Capstone Course On Nonwoven Product Development
12/07/2015 - 12/11/2015

2nd Morocco International Home Textiles & Homewares Fair
03/16/2016 - 03/19/2016

- more events -

- submit your event -

Printer Friendly
Full Site
Fiber World

Too Efficient

U.S. plants that produce multiple fiber variants with rapid changeovers have best survival chances.

Too Efficient U.S. plants that produce multiple fiber variants with rapid changeovers have best survival chances.  Astute industry observers have long urged traditional U.S. fiber producers to retreat from their dependence on commodity products and search for value-added opportunities in niche markets.Analysis of relative labor costs, coupled with apparent national ambitions often supported by government-sponsored subsidies and/or intervention, leads to an inescapable conclusion: without similar cost and tax breaks, the U.S. man-made fiber industry has little chance of achieving equal sales/production opportunities in the world market. Because these are highly unlikely events in a U.S. economy apparently prepared to sacrifice a domestic industry on the altar of international trade, survival demands other actions.And, since the United States is home to the most efficient capital markets in the world, it is natural to explore capital invested to change traditional channels of distribution as an agent of transition for the U.S. man-made fiber industry.Opportunities exist so long as the industry continues to focus on the basic proposition of niche markets. The history of polypropylene fibers and resins is instructive; it is an industry quite advanced in its management of global marketing channels.Early producers presented polypropylene fibers as made from burn-off gasses; i.e., raw material values so low as to compete for chimney time with other nonuseable by-products of petroleum distillation. Price drove a market-penetration strategy. Several technical limitations, temperature and dyeability particularly, quickly became the competitive mantras of nylon, polyester and acrylic producers. The traditional fiber producers laughed at the sometimes clumsy market approaches of large oil companies as they tried to inject their new miracle fiber into every market. Fiber producers smiled knowingly as commodity polypropylene headed for low-priced markets consistent with their introductory presentations.It quickly became apparent, however, that the oil companies felt uncomfortable producing fibers requiring large customer and technical forces, preferring instead to trade huge quantities of resins to many smaller, but not necessarily small, converters that supplied market-specific products and services.The resin supplier sidestepped the host of problems attendant to servicing a myriad of customers, each with his own equipment, each tuned differently than any of his competitors. Resin suppliers decided to leave the jobs of market development and breaking down big resin lots into market-specific quantities and qualities to converters, those closer to the final market. The resin supplier participated at a level at which it was comfortable, and the fiber manufacturer acquired an interested partner.  The SolutionFaced with some product deficiencies and non-textile distribution ambitions, polypropylene resin producers opted to encourage, and in some cases subsidize, installation of smaller-capacity production units that could be easily adapted and/or adjusted to the demands of specific, smaller, specialty markets. Polypropylene resin suppliers recognized their limitations, adapted correctly and, in a marvelous example of macro-marketing, allowed customers to decide what products were needed to satisfy specific markets. The resin producer could run high-speed, high-volume chip plants, while the markets of their customers dictated fiber specifications. For example, rope and cordage makers installed small filament production lines; upholstery manufacturers produced staple in small lots of traditional upholstery deniers and lengths; and felt producers produced items specially designed (from a common chip formulation) for nonwoven end-uses. The question now becomes whether the U.S. industry, to maintain health, can expand some existing markets sufficiently, or must new markets be developed based upon entirely new raw materials SpecializationIt long has been axiomatic among U.S. textile manufacturers that easy access to printing, dyeing and finishing operations determines the success of fabric producers. To an extent, this is an accurate assessment, but it must be added that opportunities exist to manufacture increasingly specialized items, particularly in industrial fabrics.Textile leaders long have been in awe of the ease with which a relatively healthy apparel industry evaporated into Southeast Asia in slightly more than a generation. Similar pressures now attend the home fashions, linens and domestics industries with, perhaps, a similar pattern of job export on the immediate horizon. This development appears to suggest that existing fabric construction systems, even if enhanced by sophisticated fabric surface treatments, are insufficient to ward off the siege of imports.The surface treatments shown in the table to the right have been successful in expanding markets, creating niche products and deflecting some of the impact of increased imports. As noted above, however, even with all these technologies at hand, the U.S. fiber and fabric industries have lost control of markets in apparel, domestics and some home fashions. It is possible, but not extremely likely, that these markets will return to the United States. For example, a recent report out of China details government/industry plans (Five Year Plan for the Textile Industry by the State Economic and Trade Commission) aimed at expanding the Chinese textile industry by 6.5 percent annually by focusing on increasing from seven to 20 the number of fabric producers with more than 100,000 tons of capacity. This type of offshore expansion will leave domestic suppliers scurrying to find new opportunities, perhaps in industrial fabrics. Industrial markets focus on end-use specifications often extending backward to raw materials. Surface treatments often are part of the equation, but, more often, the qualifications include minimum performance levels not necessarily available in current raw materials. Some of these characteristics are available through available polymer chemistry softness, conductivity, chemical resistance, bondability, flame retardancy and reflectance but it is interesting to ask whether these surface or polymer treatments are sufficiently sophisticated to survive some of the harsher environments of industrial markets.For example, it is logical to explore fiber and/or fabric structural elements in composites to replace current metals and plastics. Combining drape and resin impregnation in complex shapes appears to be a natural marriage. If fabrics can drape attractively on rapidly going-to-seed baby boomers, why cant they drape equally attractively and structurally in industrial uses The Corvette body long has been made from impregnated fiberglass; why not other complex shapes  Surface Treatments(Partial List)coatingsbreathabilitysoftnesswaterproofing/resistanceinsulationconductivityanti-microbialbarriersexpanded surface (filtration)reflectancebondabilitylaminateschemical resistanceflame retardancyheating/cooling  Returning To The SolutionThe key is trading efficiency for efficacy; the U.S. fiber industry efficiently produces too much of the wrong things. Why not provide the right things in the right quantities the effective way of balancing supply and demandThe man-made fiber industry must drop its dedicated focus on efficiency that resulted in production lines able to manufacture enough fiber before breakfast to supply half the world. And, with efficiency as master, the industry couldnt slow down the monster because doing so would breed inefficiency. The real solution is to slow it down, shut it down and get out of the raw-material business. Turn raw-material production over to chemical specialists. In the current terminology, the challenge is to outsource. Fiber manufacturers know their customers, but chemical processors know raw materials.The fiber manufacturer simply needs to turn these raw materials into salable products not readily available from cheaper off-shore sources. More importantly, these products should be designed around end-use specifications worked out by the fiber manufacturer, the customer and the raw-material supplier.Fiber production tied to the gods of continuous polymerizing creates the efficiency syndrome and also creates the production and inventory swings so prevalent in fiber production. Visit machinery and resin suppliers and build nimble fiber plants capable of producing multiple fiber variants with rapid changeovers. This is not efficient but it is effective. Variants imply niches, and niches imply value-added/higher profit. Higher profit means survival.Two polymer programs developing raw-material supply business models, patterned after the polypropylene approach covered earlier, are Corterra from Shell Chemical Co., Houston, and NatureWorks fibers from Cargill Dow LLC, Minnetonka, Minn. They appear to be on the right track and offer examples of future fiber production models.Corterra is Shells trade name for polytrimethylene terephthalate (PTT), a thermoplastic capable of being spun into fibers and yarns aimed at use in carpeting, apparel, nonwovens, engineering thermoplastics, films and monofilaments. Shell claims the fibers, chemically related to polyester through a common ancestor at Calico Printers in the United Kingdom, provide easy care and stretch, inherent stain resistance, softness, drape and the ability to take bright, clear colors. More importantly, Shell is and wants to remain a raw-material supplier in a three-legged marketing program: one leg aimed at textile fibers; one at films; and a third at resins like bottles. The program focuses on working with a customer to design, and make operable on existing equipment, raw-material variants suitable for replacement of existing products or expansion into new markets. Shells initial emphasis with Corterra was on carpets, but the company is increasingly expanding into more niche-focused end-uses. The combination of nylon and polyester performance characteristics should create opportunities in non-textile, industrial markets. The expansion key appears to be installation of production units, larger than prototype but smaller than current installed capacity, that are suitable for rapid changeovers and aimed at a supply of multiple specialty fibers to a niche, performance market.Similar reports surround the NatureWorks family of polylactide (PLA) fibers available from Cargill Dow. The environmental sensitivity claimed by the company provides a desirable add-on, but not a fundamental business advantage. More important is NatureWorks product versatility across many markets, with apparent applications in performance materials. Like Shell, Cargill Dow wants to remain a resin supplier. NatureWorks materials are the result of basic research, but the marketing approach is applied research.As the company builds a quarter-billion-pound resin plant in Nebraska, NatureWorks has assembled an impressive stable of development partners. Among them, Johnson City, Tenn.-based Fiber Innovation Technology is exploring bicomponent fiber variants. Interface, Atlanta, is producing development quantities for the commercial carpet market with great interest in the renewable and environmentally sensitive aspects of the fibers, especially because commercial carpet installations tend to be replaced more often than household installations.Greensboro, N.C.-based Unifi is exploring fine-denier-per-filament textured products for apparel and home fashions in both natural and package-dyed yarns. Parkdale Mills Inc., Gastonia, N.C., is looking at NatureWorks materials in combination with cotton. ConclusionsRecent experience suggests that efficiency will not protect the U.S. fiber industry. As noted in the past, the industry passed from net exporting to net importing in the late 1990s, and, it appears, with continuing low margins surrounding the current business model, there is little or no opportunity for returns on fiber investments.This situation relegates a large industry to strategies highly dependent upon the hope that some miracle will swoop down from the clouds and magically increase domestic market demands or increase the prices of all textile components available from the developing world. This reactive posture means business control comes from outside a proposition not likely to work.If efficiency doesnt work, what will The answer is to change from a raw-material-driven industry to one of raw material conversion, with polymers supplied by the Shells and Cargill Dows of the world. This change will create a more nimble and probably smaller, more profitable, value-added, niche-driven industry emphasizing industrial, non-textile applications and capable of surviving the onslaught of made-up articles created in economies driven by the efficiencies of cheap labor or government-subsidized production. Editors note: John E. Luke is owner of Five Twenty Six Associates Inc., Bryn Mawr, Pa., a consulting firm specializing in strategic marketing and operations facing textile fiber and fabric manufacturers. He is also a professor of textile marketing at Philadelphia University, Philadelphia. September 2001