Importers Defend Trade With China
By James A. Morrissey, Washington Correspondent
More than 150 organizations, including the Who’s Who of retailing and manufacturers of consumer
goods, have written to members of Congress extolling the benefits of global trade and urging them
not to bash China because of the burgeoning US/China trade deficit.
As several committees in both the House and Senate are considering legislation to address
with punitive tariffs and other measures what many see as China’s predatory trade practices, the
importers said “retaliatory measures such as increasing tariffs or assessing user fees will do more
harm than good.” Companies signing the letter included such major importers of Chinese apparel as
Wal-Mart, Target and Gap, as well as trade associations including the US Association of Importers
of Textiles and Apparel, the American Apparel and Footwear Association and the National Retail
Federation.
The letter said: “Participation in the global economy has provided significant and important
benefits for the United States. Many in the United States, however, have concerns about the impact
that globalization in general and trade with China in particular are having on jobs and economic
security. We recognize that some parts of the US economy have faced substantially increased
competition. We agree that constructive efforts should be pursued vigorously to address such
concerns and increase the benefits from engagement in the international economy for all Americans.”
The letter went on to say the benefits of participation in the international economy go
beyond increased economic activity and the creation of high-quality jobs in the United States,
claiming US companies also are promoting better employment and environmental preservation practices
and health and safety standards to facilities in China and around the world.
The importers say advancing the United States’ interests requires eliminating barriers to
trade abroad and increasing competitiveness at home. They add that, for example, China has already
made “major advances” in implementing its World Trade Organization commitments in a manner that has
benefited nearly all major sectors of the US economy.
The letter said imposing barriers to trade in the name of currency valuation or product
safety is not a solution to the underlying concerns about the impact of global trade, and it
ultimately undermines the work that should be undertaken “to prepare our economy and our workers
for the realities of the global economy.”
October 2, 2007



