Home    Resource Store    Past Issues    Buyers' Guide    Career Center    Subscriptions    Advertising    E-Newsletter    Contact

http://ahweb.adsale.com.hk/t.aspx?unt=2396-ZhejiangTex14_TextileWorld
http://www.thiestextilmaschinen.com
http://www.textileworld.com/partners/Shaffer_and_Max-Dyeing_and_Finishing_Plant_2014
http://www.spgprints.com
http://www.expoproduccion.mx/Content/Exhibitors/24/
http://ahweb.adsale.com.hk/t.aspx?unt=2354-STX15_TextileWorld
http://www.textileservicesonline.com
http://www.textileworld.com/forms/mediakit.html
July/August 2014 July/August 2014

View Issue  |

Subscribe Now  |

Events

ISS Vegas '14
08/03/2014 - 08/05/2014

Los Angeles Fashion Market - Holiday/Resort '14
08/04/2014 - 08/07/2014

Outdoor Retailer Summer Market
08/06/2014 - 08/09/2014

- more events -

- submit your event -

Printer Friendly
Full Site
Washington Outlook Archive

Textile Makers Seek Relief From Chinese Imports

Washinigton Outlook

James A. Morrissey, Washington Correspondent

US textile manufacturers have filed a series of petitions with the government seeking protection from what they see as an impending surge of Chinese imports, a move that has triggered a major confrontation with the Chinese government and textile and apparel importers. The US textile makers are asking the administration to use the safeguard mechanism China agreed to when it was admitted into the World Trade Organization (WTO). That mechanism says the US can negotiate or unilaterally impose quotas on products where it can be demonstrated there is market disruption or a threat of market disruption.

While the US government in 2002 did impose quotas on three product categories of textiles, that action was based on a showing of actual market disruption. US textile manufacturers are plowing new ground by seeking similar action based on a threat of market disruption. They are asking for quotas on 10 categories of trousers, knit shirts, underwear, cotton sheets, synthetic filament fabric and cotton yarn. Trade data from the US Department of Commerce show that in the past 12 months, Chinese imports of textile and apparel amounted to $2.3 billion, a 50-percent gain over the comparable period of 2003. The coalition is also expected to ask for a one-year extension of the quotas placed on the three product categories in 2002.

The Chinese government and US importers of textiles and apparel have reacted sharply to the safeguard proposal, denouncing it as baseless and misguided. Laura E. Jones said the action is a bogus attempt to blame others for the failures of the US textile industry. Expressing their high concern over the proposals, Chinese trade officials said the petitions are a brazen breach of WTO rules and seriously hurt the confidence of Chinese firms in the global trade environment. Some of the nations largest importers, who are represented by the National Retail Federation, say the attempt to restore quotas is simply unacceptable, and they have charged that the administration has caved into political pressure by allowing the industry to file the petitions.

Politics could enter the picture because of the timing of one of the petitions. A coalition of US textile manufacturers filed the first petition covering imports of cotton trousers on October 8. Under the governments procedures, the Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements has 15 working days to determine if the petition has technical merit, and that deadline happens to fall on election eve, November 1. Some Washington observers say the timing was not accidental.

In seeking the safeguard action, textile manufacturer said the action is justified by what they see as a flood of Chinese imports once quotas are removed on Jan. 1, 2005. Charging that China uses a number of illegal and unfair subsidies to drive competition out of the market place, Karl Spilhaus, president of the National Textile Association, said "No industry playing by free-market rules can compete with an industry allowed to sell into a free-market but not playing by free-market rules." Cass Johnson, president of the National Council of Textile Organizations (NCTO), said the threat is justified by past performance and evidence of plans by the Chinese to expand their exporting capability. "In the apparel and home textile categories released from quota in January 2002, China exploded from less than 10 percent market share in 2001 to more than 70 percent market share in June 2004," Johnson said.

Absent implementation of safeguards, China will capture similar market share post-2005 and destroy the textile and apparel manufacturing complex. The petitions cover roughly $1.96 billion in clothing and textile imports. While the numbers are relatively small, in the overall world trade picture, retailers and other importers of textiles and apparel charge that reimposition of quotas would force consumers to pay higher prices at a time when prices should be dropping as a result of the end of the quota system.

  October 2004




Advertisement

http://www.staubli.us